-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Massachusetts bans sale of new "assault weapons"
- Thread starter stchas
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
And either stay home on election day or keep wasting your vote on a third party candidate who has ZERO chance of being elected. We must get the Democrats out of the White House.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA-Men! A-Men!!!!! Dem, Lib, Progs.... It will be at YOUR feet.......
I'm not a big AR guy, but this makes me want to buy one just for the sake of irritating Massachusetts.
I don't think it's time for a civil war either, but a national divorce? I'd support that. The red states get to keep the guns, and the blue states get to keep all the spoiled turds that don't want to work. I think it's time we saw other people. It's not me, it's you.
I really don't want to share a "free" country with these idiots anymore.
I don't think it's time for a civil war either, but a national divorce? I'd support that. The red states get to keep the guns, and the blue states get to keep all the spoiled turds that don't want to work. I think it's time we saw other people. It's not me, it's you.
I really don't want to share a "free" country with these idiots anymore.
Get em now while they're cheap.......
Amen to that ! .... because I have the feeling that they aren't going to stay cheap for much longer.
JeremiahJohnson
Master
...or just move out. Don't want our money? Fine. Bye.
Massachusetts banned assault weapons 18 years ago. In 2015 alone, however, the state says nearly 10,000 “copycat” guns were sold. The Attorney General’s office says a “copycat” gun is substantially similar to a banned gun in its configuration and interchangeable parts, but has some minor tweaks so they can be marketed as legal.
The directive specifically outlines two tests to determine what constitutes a “copy” or “duplicate” of a prohibited weapon. If a gun’s operating system is essentially the same as that of a banned weapon, or if the gun has components that are interchangeable with those of a banned weapon, it’s a “copy” or “duplicate,” and it is illegal. Assault weapons prohibited under our laws cannot be altered in any way to make their sale or possession legal in Massachusetts.
The directive specifically outlines two tests to determine what constitutes a “copy” or “duplicate” of a prohibited weapon. If a gun’s operating system is essentially the same as that of a banned weapon, or if the gun has components that are interchangeable with those of a banned weapon, it’s a “copy” or “duplicate,” and it is illegal. Assault weapons prohibited under our laws cannot be altered in any way to make their sale or possession legal in Massachusetts.
I love how he says that removing the prohibited features that they use to define an "assault weapon" from an AR clone does not make it any less deadly.
So he is admitting that these prohibite features do nothing to make guns more or less dangerous, thus their entire law is based on banning things that merely LOOK scary.
CHALLENGE: design the scariest ****ING rifle that fully complies with their stupid law. Put crap on it that does nothing but makes it look scary. Levers, buttons, things that flip up... make it give this AG a fit.
So he is admitting that these prohibite features do nothing to make guns more or less dangerous, thus their entire law is based on banning things that merely LOOK scary.
CHALLENGE: design the scariest ****ING rifle that fully complies with their stupid law. Put crap on it that does nothing but makes it look scary. Levers, buttons, things that flip up... make it give this AG a fit.
Yup just like the FTA can say a shoestring is a full auto
You should look at what states take in vs pay federal tax dollars
AmmoManAaron
Master
There was a gun called the CM-55 that California banned by name well over 20 years ago...it was literally a scary looking single shot shotgun. History repeats itself, only the names and details change.
Item:9514388 Component Metal Products CM-55 Single Barrel 12 Gauge Shotgun In Box For Sale at GunAuction.com
Your "CM-55" is not listed here - http://www.calguns.net/caawid/sgflowchart.pdf
Got a link to the restriction?
Perhaps we should look towards Australia and how its gun control was implemented. They had a very proud gun culture until the port Arthur massacre. The saving grace in American is that we cling to our firearms as part of our beliefs. Our country was literally founded on a very few people who literally "had enough." We still cling to that culture today, with the only exception being we don't quite know when enough will be enough for the next time. And statistically we would be about do for something. I hope not. But little nibbles from our freedom eventually end up being a big ragged bite.
JeremiahJohnson
Master
Legal Experts: How can the AG of any state write law?
Site Supporter
Staff online
-
d.kaufmanStill Here -
KellyinAvonBlue-ID Mafia Consigliere
Members online
- krvincen
- SmokeMedic
- BR8818
- HHollow
- d.kaufman
- SOUP
- gds
- 2tonic
- EPeter213
- Born2vette
- tjones
- tsilveus
- Squid556
- MC1983
- PowderApe
- indyblue
- KellyinAvon
- shootamc58
- melensdad
- TheGrumpyGuy
- Butch627
- bloodandgutsmurphy
- ChristianPatriot
- model1994
- RangeJunkie
- Lumpy76
- Frontiersman
- Denny347
- mgross28
- indykid
- daddyusmaximus
- rkwhyte2
- sadclownwp
- BIGred7173
- Meatstick
- Wabatuckian
- cakndsn
- Scott58
- Stang51d
- Win52C
- BigD
- cobber
- medavis428@
- Haven
- dieselrealtor
- Ashton1911
- printcraft
- Bennettjh
- Fire Lord
- downrange72
