Mixed verdict given to military whistleblower PFC Bradley Manning

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    FORT MEADE, MD — A military judge on Tuesday found Pfc. Bradley Manning not guilty of “aiding the enemy” for his release of hundreds of thousands of military and diplomatic documents to WikiLeaks. But she convicted him of multiple counts of violating the Espionage Act, stealing government property and other charges that could result in a maximum sentence of 136 years.

    The judge, Col. Denise Lind, backed down from setting a precedent of condemning Manning for passing leaked information to the press. A decision of that nature would have had broad consequences for future whistleblowers.

    It remains to be seen how severe the punishment will be for the remaining convictions.

    Manning acquitted of aiding the enemy | NYTimes

    manning-wikileaks.jpeg2.jpg
     

    glockednlocked

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jun 7, 2008
    704
    18
    yea for him! I still think he is a traitor and deserved to be lined up with Hasan and they could share the same bullet.
     

    DarkLight

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jul 10, 2008
    119
    18
    Thorntown

    Well stated. I'm constantly amazed...no, strike that, disappointed with a large portion of my fellow Americans and thier opinions regarding whistle blowers like Manning and Snowden. How many of our fellow INGOers talk about the oathes to uphold the constatution made by politicians and military service men and women, and then turn around and call these people traitors or crazy when they try to warn the citizenry of the evils our government is doing?
     

    Kagnew

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 30, 2009
    2,618
    48
    Columbus
    "Whistle-blower." Just a poor little, innocent, well-meaning, misunderstood "whistle-blower". I just hope they lock the little fruit in a cell with a very, very large combat vet named "Bubba".
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    [h=1]What The Bradley Manning Verdict Tells Us About America[/h]

    [video=youtube;IJl6V4JQFl4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJl6V4JQFl4[/video]
     

    netsecurity

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    22   0   0
    Oct 14, 2011
    4,201
    48
    Hancock County
    Well stated. I'm constantly amazed...no, strike that, disappointed with a large portion of my fellow Americans and thier opinions regarding whistle blowers like Manning and Snowden. How many of our fellow INGOers talk about the oathes to uphold the constatution made by politicians and military service men and women, and then turn around and call these people traitors or crazy when they try to warn the citizenry of the evils our government is doing?

    I think you, and others in this thread, are way off base here. Manning had no agenda to protect the constitution. He just wanted to make America look evil amd embolden oir enemies. He is a true traitor to leak sensitive imformation that had no relevance or purpose other than undermining our military efforts.

    Snowden, to me, is completely different. He is a whistle blower, protecting civil loberties by exposing tyranny. How do you find the two similar? And what makes you stand up for Manning? He leaked basically all the top secret data he could, knowing our enemies would receive it, and use it to murder Americans. Snowden leaked only information exposing broad unconstitutional behavior, which seems to have harmed no one. So far it appears that Snowden is a real hero. What did Manning do to earn your respect?
     

    Bummer

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 5, 2010
    1,202
    12
    West side of Indy
    ... He is a true traitor to leak sensitive imformation that had no relevance or purpose other than undermining our military efforts. ...

    I do not particularly respect (or for that matter disrespect) Manning, so I am unable to answer your question. I do, however, have a question of my own.

    I did not follow this case, so I have not read much about what exactly Manning leaked. Now that I've started reading, I find nothing that could directly endanger our military members. Everything I've seen appears to be exposed for arguably humanitarian ends.

    What information that Manning exposed do you feel could have endangered troops in a war zone? Aside from just doing it, what has Manning done to earn your enmity?

    I stress that I do not ask this as an attack upon your position, but rather out of ignorance and curiosity.
     

    Stickfight

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 6, 2010
    925
    18
    Dountoun ND
    I don't know what 'wring in' means in the above context, but exposing the crimes of authorities shouldn't be a crime whether they want them to remain secret or not.
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    I was about to ask the same thing as Bummer.

    How does anyone claim to know that Manning hates America? How has the military been undermined by a press leak?
     

    radonc73

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 24, 2010
    282
    18
    Lowell
    When you enlist you give up a lot of your rights including Innocent until Proven Guilty. What he did I feel was wrong b/c he was in the military. From what I understand he was mad about DADT and this was his way of payback. Well he got it. If he is gay he will love Leavenworth without time off for good behavior he could be there for 20-30 years no problem.
     

    LeeStreet

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Oct 26, 2009
    1,012
    38
    South of Steuben Co.
    Great, now the government ( us tax payers ) gets to pay for hormone treatment to transforme Bradley into Chelsea, or try to fight his/her desire in court. He entered the military as a male, & should stay a male. But, I know that is cruel & inhuman treatment of a prisoner.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    35,806
    149
    Valparaiso
    When you place yourself in the position of defending and venerating every person who leaks classified information, you'll end up siding with some pretty selfish and amoral people.

    Some will do it because it's what they think is right for the country.
    Some will do it for money.
    Some will doing for sex.
    Some will do it because they do, in fact, hate America.
    Some will do it because they are mentally or emotionally scarred and "need" a way to act out.
    Some will do it to make themselves feel significant in a world where everyone demands their 15 minutes.
    Some will do it out of anger and spite over any number of things.

    ALL will claim they did it because its what they think is right.

    ...and some will believe it every time because they have a preexisting bias.
     
    Last edited:

    drillsgt

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    108   0   0
    Nov 29, 2009
    9,647
    149
    Sioux Falls, SD
    Great, now the government ( us tax payers ) gets to pay for hormone treatment to transforme Bradley into Chelsea, or try to fight his/her desire in court. He entered the military as a male, & should stay a male. But, I know that is cruel & inhuman treatment of a prisoner.
    . Give him extra testosterone and steroids and make him work out five times a day while looking at scantily clad women
     

    MPH

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 25, 2011
    130
    18
    <~NOT a 'Baker' unit
    He wasn't unjustly charged Or convicted. He was entrusted, via an extensive background check into his character to maintain classified information. Period. He knew full well the penalties for disclosure of this information. He, and some people here apparently may want to martyr his position, but I am not one of them. Now all that is needed is to strip all rank insignia from his uniform and paint a large "P" on the back of the uniform.
     
    Top Bottom