The punchline is running the show.Fight racism with racism. It's perfectly acceptable in certain directions apparently. A very large segment of this country is a joke.
Soon they will demand their own drinking fountains.
We may or may not find out, just depends on how woke the white teachers are. If they're truly woke they won't sue or complain. While its complete BS I will admit to taking pleasure hearing of the rubber meeting the road for some of these people.I cannot imagine how this can be legal.
We may or may not find out, just depends on how woke the white teachers are. If they're truly woke they won't sue or complain. While its complete BS I will admit to taking pleasure hearing of the rubber meeting the road for some of these people.
MN passed a state law to allow this.I cannot imagine how this can be legal.
Yes, Me too. I see being "Woke up" far differently than way too many douche bags.We may or may not find out, just depends on how woke the white teachers are. If they're truly woke they won't sue or complain. While its complete BS I will admit to taking pleasure hearing of the rubber meeting the road for some of these people.
Obummer did that by 25 years. Or he tried like hell.That's why the Left had to change the definition of racism is so that the federal non-discrimination laws don't get used against them. By all means lets go back to segregation. I'm sure it'll be fine to set race relations back 50 years or so...
Actually, according to the article, there is now a state statute that allows for this and, according to State Representative, Jeremy Munson, R-MN, per the article, "State Rep. Jeremy Munson (R-MN) slammed the new policy, which reportedly mirrors a new Minnesota statute."I cannot imagine how this can be legal.
I'm not seeing how it mirrors it.Actually, according to the article, there is now a state statute that allows for this and, according to State Representative, Jeremy Munson, R-MN, per the article, "State Rep. Jeremy Munson (R-MN) slammed the new policy, which reportedly mirrors a new Minnesota statute."
“Section E of State Statute includes the new text between the “**”: In addition to developing a Staff Development Plan, the Staff Development Advisory Committee also must develop teacher mentoring programs for teachers new to the profession **or school district, including teaching residents, teachers of color, teachers who are American Indian, teachers in license shortage areas, teachers with special needs,** or experienced teachers in need of peer coaching,” Munson continued.
Sapp led the way in having the board vote to amend district policy directing that only non-white teachers can receive “additional stipends” so they can ostensibly become mentors to other non-white colleagues. The new policy will begin “placing American Indian educators at sites with other American Indian educators and educators of color at sites with other educators of color.”
I did not say the statute actually existed, what I said was, 'According to the article...' which sounds more and more like an excuse than a reason for the pay difference (aka, 'additional stipends')I'm not seeing how it mirrors it.
Nothing there about paying anyone more based upon race. They try to justify it by throwing out the mentor tag, but that is nonsense.