New ruger 9mm carbine with folding, and adjustable stock

[nipprdog]

https://ruger.com/products/pcCarbine/specSheets/19140.html

 

[KokomoDave]

That handguard reminds me of the Russian PPSH.

 

[MrSmitty]

We got one in at work, looks nice, haven't handled it too much, will change that tomorrow...have to know what I sell...that's my story, and I'm sticking to it

 

[TheGhostRider]

We got one in at work, looks nice, haven't handled it too much, will change that tomorrow...have to know what I sell...that's my story, and I'm sticking to it

I want to hear your feedback. Good, bad or meh. This looks like what I’ve been waiting for. A folder, breakdown backpack gun made of metal.
I love the Beretta CX4 9mm but… I want it to have a folding stock. Since they don’t exist, this little Ruger looks like the ticket. Glock mag compatible… excellent.

 

[gregkl]

What’s the difference between this and the 19100 other than the pistol grip and adjustable stock?

I liked the 19100 when I handled it in the shop.

 

[nipprdog]

What’s the difference between this and the 19100 other than the pistol grip and adjustable stock?

I liked the 19100 when I handled it in the shop.

For one, this stock folds.

 

[NyleRN]

Looks like a jigsaw puzzle with all the pieces in the wrong places. Nothing on that gun is streamlined.

 

[Kdf101]

first impression for me is, it they are going to put a rail section on it, and they should, why don’t they put it on the end of the barrel for a front sight?

 

[marvin02]

PC CARBINE 9MM SYN 16' 17+1

<p>19140 | THREADED</p>

lockedloaded.com

 

[gregkl]

For one, this stock folds.

That's kinda cool. Remove the barrel, fold the stock and you have rifle that will fit in a small space.

 

[gregkl]

Apologize for the thread drift and I will start a new one if necessary but has anyone ever used one those Aimaculate folding devices for a standard AR?

I figure as little as I shoot rifles, I could shoot.223 for a long time before I’d offset the cost of a PCC.

 

[shootersix]

first impression for me is, it they are going to put a rail section on it, and they should, why don’t they put it on the end of the barrel for a front sight?

Because nobody puts iron sights on a pcc!

And the rail section on the barrel is a lot smarter than the rail section on the receiver because removing the barrel can change the zero, mounting it on the barrel won’t change the zero, in fact a few companies actually make rail sections that replace the rear sight

 

[Kdf101]

Because nobody puts iron sights on a pcc!

And the rail section on the barrel is a lot smarter than the rail section on the receiver because removing the barrel can change the zero, mounting it on the barrel won’t change the zero, in fact a few companies actually make rail sections that replace the rear sight

I put iron sights on mine. Might just be me though. I just can’t come to terms with a gun with no iron sights. Kind of have to make an exception for most hunting rifles these days though, since almost none of them have them.

 

[shootersix]

I put iron sights on mine. Might just be me though. I just can’t come to terms with a gun with no iron sights. Kind of have to make an exception for most hunting rifles these days though, since almost none of them have them.

Ok I should add, I didn’t put optics on my ruger pcc, but I’ve only shot it once (in a steel challenge match)

 

[nipprdog]

.....