Wabatukian said...
"They just shouldn't be released into society with the root causes of their violence unaddressed."
This is the simple answer that seems to be completely ignored by the liberal weenie left.
Nope, not at all."Shall not be infringed" is the simple answer being ignored by the weenie right in this thread. It sounds like you are one of those "I'm pro 2A, but..." kind of people.
Wabatukian said...
"They just shouldn't be released into society with the root causes of their violence unaddressed."
This is the simple answer that seems to be completely ignored by the liberal weenie left.
I agree.
If someone is to violent to be trusted with a firearm lock them up, or put them down like you do a sick animal.Things this country did before.
Hard labor, beans, rice, and water only for food, no TV, or entertainment including books that are meant for entertainment. Only books that have educational purposes. That might give incentive not to comment crime in the future.
NO! To all the questions, including the last one.Also @JAL
So as of now none violent felons can buy firearms?
Or just possess firearms?
Or it isn't that far along yet?
Is this a continuation of the same case IIRC from Illinois about a felon being allowed to own a firearm?
Duarte is an American citizen, and thus one of “the people” whom the Second Amendment protects. The Second
Amendment’s plain text and historically understood meaning therefore presumptively guarantee his individual
right to possess a firearm for self-defense. The Government failed to rebut that presumption by demonstrating that
permanently depriving Duarte of this fundamental right is otherwise consistent with our Nation’s history. We therefore
hold that § 922(g)(1) violates Duarte’s Second Amendment rights and is unconstitutional as applied to him.
REVERSED; CONVICTION VACATED.
i don't think so...I'm sure they will find a way to turn this ruling on it's head and make it apply to Hunter if necessary. I'm guessing Brandon already has some sort of a pre-pardon written, possibly covering himself as well as Hunter JIC.
I am the same. Anyone among free society has all the rights attendant to free society, including RKBA. Anyone unfit to be trusted to exercise RKBA because they are violent offenders should not be left loose among free society. Such violent offenders should be kept behind bars unless/until they are no longer a threat to abuse RKBA or otherwise continue to be violent offenders.I know I'm an outlier here on INGO when it comes to this topic, but as far as I'm concerned, anyone that's free to walk the streets with the rest of us is free to keep and bear arms as well.
To me, the correct solution is to arm yourself and prepare yourself in case bad people come your direction, not take away the rights of those we find scary.
But I'm a purist in this regard.