Political Funny Pictures Thread

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Bill of Rights

    Cogito, ergo porto.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Apr 26, 2008
    18,096
    77
    Where's the bacon?
    QFYnIl4.jpg

    Image stolen. I know some who need to see that that's what happens.

    Fortunately, some of us see what's going on and resist it long enough to get out and continue thinking as we wish.
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,083
    113
    NWI

    If you are in the army and have a secret clearance as I did when I was a company armorer, you will probably NEVER see a document stamped SECRET. The cursory investigation is just to see if there are any prominent character faults that could be exploited. It would be likely that someone in this situation would not know the nature of classified material. They would know that anything with a caveat stamped on it had to be protected.

    When you move into an area where you NEED access to SCI you have a complete background check on the ground to see if there is the smallest indiscretion that you would be want to hide.

    When you are "read on" to a compartment you actually read a document that familiarizes you with not only the nature of the information, but also the source and the special caveats related to that compartment.

    The most important aspect of that information is the source. If the info is traced back to the source the source dies, either actually or figuratively.

    No one who is "read on" can ever say "I didn't understand". I know.
     

    GIJEW

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Mar 14, 2009
    2,716
    47
    If you are in the army and have a secret clearance as I did when I was a company armorer, you will probably NEVER see a document stamped SECRET. The cursory investigation is just to see if there are any prominent character faults that could be exploited. It would be likely that someone in this situation would not know the nature of classified material. They would know that anything with a caveat stamped on it had to be protected.

    When you move into an area where you NEED access to SCI you have a complete background check on the ground to see if there is the smallest indiscretion that you would be want to hide.

    When you are "read on" to a compartment you actually read a document that familiarizes you with not only the nature of the information, but also the source and the special caveats related to that compartment.

    The most important aspect of that information is the source. If the info is traced back to the source the source dies, either actually or figuratively.

    No one who is "read on" can ever say "I didn't understand". I know.
    Thanks. This will help explain to useful idiots why clinton (either one) is full of more crap than a porto-let at a rock concert.
    But to be fair, like Trump said, maybe she really is brain damaged with those blood clots and her concussion?
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,062
    113
    Uranus
    If you are in the army and have a secret clearance as I did when I was a company armorer, you will probably NEVER see a document stamped SECRET. The cursory investigation is just to see if there are any prominent character faults that could be exploited. It would be likely that someone in this situation would not know the nature of classified material. They would know that anything with a caveat stamped on it had to be protected.

    Navy disciplines nine service members who mistakenly wandered into Iran's territorial waters - LA Times

    The report revealed crew members told Iranian interrogators the top speed of the boats and passwords to their phones and laptops, which violates Navy code of conduct.
    “It is clear that some, if not all, crew members provided at least some information to interrogators beyond name, rank, service number and date of birth,” the report said.
    http://www.latimes.com/world/middleeast/la-na-iran-navy-detainment-report-20160630-snap-story.html

     
    Last edited:
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom