That was my understanding as well. I'm gonna talk to the lawyer that drafted my trust and post the answer. I have four people on my trust, so this would make getting a new NFA item a timely process.
I have been wanting to get a trust set up myself and have procrastinated. Is it too late?
Reduce to two, buy new item, raise it back to four. Rinse/repeat.
Another astounding example of a law that effectively does nothing.....
Still a PITA to reduce the number, buy item, increase back up because I believe every time it's amended the new trustees must be present and sign the amendment in front a notary. Am I mistaken?
That being said, could a person effectively "bypass" this by having a trust within a trust? Trust 1 (top-level) has all the trustees listed and "owns" trust #2. Trust #2 has just 1 trustee that does the buying etc. ATF wouldn't even have to know that Trust #2 is held within Trust #1, for all they know Trust #2 is the only one. Is my "legal logic" flawed?
I don't see why they would need to sign in front of a notary when they didn't when the trust was formed? I would ask your NFA trust attorney for clarification.
My trustees do not need to be present when notarized. I am the only one that has to sign it since I I am the owner of the trust.
I have no clue about the trust within the trust, legalities or purpose.
However, my trust was written by Marc Halata. There are four of us on the trust and the notary ad I were the only ones that needed to sign.
Yep, same here.Same lawyer here and same situation when it was notarized.
Reduce to two, buy new item, raise it back to four. Rinse/repeat.
Another astounding example of a law that effectively does nothing.....