GEEEE, YA DON'T SAY
General jihadist propaganda may have inspired Tennessee gunman: source | Reuters
General jihadist propaganda may have inspired Tennessee gunman: source | Reuters
Interesting combination of two logical fallacies to avoid addressing the points I have made.
For those keeping score, there's a hasty generalization, and argumentum ad hominem.
Can't help but wonder if the shooting was plan B, plan A being the nuke plant
Why he chose the target he did is one question, and a radical interpretation of Islam is certainly the most likely candidate. Why he went shooting at all is a different question, though, and that's what I was addressing.
Can't help but wonder if the shooting was plan B, plan A being the nuke plant
General Jihadist... See, it IS the officers!
Seriously though, we have been warned ad nauseum about these "lone wolves" being radicalized and that they pose as much if not more of a threat than any kind of organized "sleeper cell", so why is it even being questioned that this is the case here? Occam's Razor anyone?
I WAS RIGHT!!!!!
GENERAL JIHAD is a rap "artist"...... rap is to blame.
[video=youtube;aRT05lIketY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aRT05lIketY[/video]
His parents seem to have a moderate interpretation of Islam. I think he was radicalized away from that view. To me that answers both questions.
I wondered that too, but who knows?
We're in agreement on all that then. I noted that you contrasted the good/bad officers. The statement that followed that wasn't for you, though my paragraph construction made it look like it was.I apologize for putting words in your mouth. I did not intend to, but oversimplified several pages of this thread, and I should not have.
As far as the officer corp argument goes, no O-5's or even O-6's are making these decisions. It's more like people who sit on the JCS, or people, uniformed or otherwise, that advise them or that they advise. High level stuff. I agree it is not an "O side" vs "E side" conspiracy. I did not, however, lump all officers together with the jerks. On the contrary, I made a point of contrasting them.
You either don't know what ad hominem means or lack the basic self awareness to realize that the lens a chaplain sees things through and the lens a junior enlisted man sees through are not the same. I'm done addressing the points you've made as I've put my experiences, the experiences of others, and quotes from a highly positioned officer as facts to bolster my point. I doubt we'll change each other's mind on the topic, and there's enough info out there for others to make their own determination.
From what I've read, schizophrenia onset at his age isn't unusual. An undetected illness?
"The officer corps doesn't like the idea of enlisted and NCO with weappons [sic]. They tolerate it on the battlefield, but they don't trust them otherwise."
The federal government is stepping up to the plate to protect soldiers on US soil:
U.S. military tells recruiting centers to step up security by closing blinds | Local News | Times Free Press
Since those "no guns" signs obviously worked to keep that shooter outside the recruiting center... Are these people really paid money to provide defense?