Ron Paul In the Cross Hairs ... Marriage - Colter VS LewRockwell

[Duncan]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRFVFb21C3M

Privatize Marriage Now by Ryan McMaken

 

[04DarkShadowGT]

Im all for pulling our troops out from, well pretty much everywhere in the middle east.

 

[Stschil]

Colter has been 'Carvilized' I'll bet they sit at home and talk about what each can say that will promote the others' stature and bank account.


These main stream politico's don't care what the candidate's politics are, all they care about is if it will make them money. If RP suddenly became the front runner, they would be behind him in lock step and start trashing the others. Why do people believe this drival?

 

[Lead Head]

I think the "main stream" is scared out of their wits regarding Ron Paul. It was similar back in the day with Ross Perot, spoiler or not. I voted for Ross and would possibly vote for Ron but the media mill will probably chew him up before we get there. Ron Paul is about a quarter of a century ahead of the times but when we finally get there, it may be too late.

Program enough half wits through the media and they will vote like lemmings.

The only democratic way to ever change the path we are on is to elect a third party independent that is grounded in conservative and constitutional values. Someone who understands what The United States of American once meant and what it must once again stand for. Right now, we are lost without a compass and no map, and running low on supplies. The supply routes are being cutoff and morale is on shaky ground. We must prevail.

Until then, Diet Pepsi or Diet Coke ?

Go along to get along is the noose that could hang us.

A Vote of No Confidence is where I'm at right this very second !

Stop me before I say what I really feel but the is just starting to run thru my veins so I could still be half asleep.

 

[Stschil]

I think they all spend aaay too much time drinking at this place:

 

[level.eleven]

Coulter doesn't even understand current marriage laws, a blood test? Your tennis coach?

Is Billy O proud of the fact he doesn't understand economics? He doesn't even know who Keynes is....I hope he was playing dumb.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Coulter doesn't even understand current marriage laws, a blood test? Your tennis coach?

Ann Coulter's point being, as she has written before, that how will it be ensured that cousins or siblings do not marry and who will solemnize the marriage, your tennis coach?

I think the "main stream" is scared out of their wits regarding Ron Paul.

The main stream media is terrified of Palin, not Paul. The Society for the Advanced Study of Ink Pen Caps has more members than there are Paul voters.

Not that I would disagree with anything Paul would do as President, it's just that he has no support whatsoever.

 

[Garb]

I had the sudden urge to draw a Hitler mustache on Cher, I mean Brittany Speares, I mean Ann Coulter.

 

[rambone]

Ann Coulter's point being, as she has written before, that how will it be ensured that cousins or siblings do not marry and who will solemnize the marriage, your tennis coach?

The better question is, why should government have to? Is it their job to regulate religious institutions?

The main stream media is terrified of Palin, not Paul.

We should all be terrified of anyone who is going to continue throwing our money away on foreign wars, drug war shenanigans, "Patriot" Act, hyped-up Homeland Security, etc. I haven't seen Palin take a stand against any of that.

 

[firehawk1]

The main stream media is terrified of Palin, not Paul. The Society for the Advanced Study of Ink Pen Caps has more members than there are Paul voters.

EXACTLY!

The media has no fear of Paul because they have already convinced most potential voters he is a kook, flake, etc... People mock Palin, BUT if she wasn't seen as a threat to the left they wouldn't have their panties in such a bunch. She scares the crap out of the them.

 

[Garb]

EXACTLY!

The media has no fear of Paul because they have already convinced most potential voters he is a kook, flake, etc... People mock Palin, BUT if she wasn't seen as a threat to the left they wouldn't have their panties in such a bunch. She scares the crap out of the them.

She scares the crap out of me because people buy the stuff that comes out of her mouth. I don't understand what makes her so qualified, she quit her last job because it was stressful.

 

[firehawk1]

We should all be terrified of anyone who is going to continue throwing our money away on foreign wars, drug war shenanigans, "Patriot" Act, hyped-up Homeland Security, etc. I haven't seen Palin take a stand against any of that.

And you WON'T see whoever who is elected in November 2012 do it either. THAT is just reality, not what we want but reality.

Rambone you're a smart man, we cannot deal in what if's, and wishful thinking. We must be willing to be satisfied with taking baby steps to begin correcting the problems we have. First step IMO is to get rid of Obama. Kind of pointless fretting over the Patriot Act, etc... if this socialist runs the country into the ground to a point it is impossible to recover from.

Let's say Paul somehow is actually elected POTUS in '12. Do you actually think the "establishment" politicians in Congress would just suddenly 'see the light" and change course? Not very likely. He would be marginalized and most likely be a lame duck from day 1.

 

[Garb]

And you WON'T see whoever who is elected in November 2012 do it either. THAT is just reality, not what we want but reality.

Rambone you're a smart man, we cannot deal in what if's, and wishful thinking. We must be willing to be satisfied with taking baby steps to begin correcting the problems we have. First step IMO is to get rid of Obama. Kind of pointless fretting over the Patriot Act, etc... if this socialist runs the country into the ground to a point it is impossible to recover from.

Let's say Paul somehow is actually elected POTUS in '12. Do you actually think the "establishment" politicians in Congress would just suddenly 'see the light" and change course? Not very likely. He would be marginalized and most likely be a lame duck from day 1.

I agree with this analysis, but getting rid of Obama should not be our number one goal. Getting a candidate that actually plans on doing something about the situation we're is more important. Contrary to what others on this board think, I don't see most of the Republicans as the lesser of two evils. In fact, they tend to advocate things almost everyone on this forum hates. I'll be voting for Paul or Johnson. Not because I think they'll win, but because I refuse to support someone just because they're not Obama. That's how Obama won the 2008 election, and that's how the next a**wipe will win it.

 

[firehawk1]

She scares the crap out of me because people buy the stuff that comes out of her mouth. I don't understand what makes her so qualified, she quit her last job because it was stressful.

What exactly comes out of her mouth that scares you?

What should scare people is playing games with elections. It WILL be a Republican or Democrat elected in November 2012. BANK on it. And it WON'T be Ron Paul.

Nieve thinking that Ron Paul or ANY potential candidate like him will be elected is just crazy talk, and refusing to accept reality. We HAVE to start somewhere, and getting rid of Obama and the rest of his thugs HAS to be the first priority.

 

[firehawk1]

I agree with this analysis, but getting rid of Obama should not be our number one goal. Getting a candidate that actually plans on doing something about the situation we're is more important. Contrary to what others on this board think, I don't see most of the Republicans as the lesser of two evils. In fact, they tend to advocate things almost everyone on this forum hates. I'll be voting for Paul or Johnson. Not because I think they'll win, but because I refuse to support someone just because they're not Obama. That's how Obama won the 2008 election, and that's how the next a**wipe will win it.

We HAVE to correct the financial situation first. While not perfect or what we really want, ANY of the Republicans would do a better job correcting the path the economy is on now. That is the first step, getting the economy back on track. THEN we can afford the "luxury" of taking on the other major problems we face. Sitting by and allowing the United States to be turned into a third world country make all the other problems small IMO. If we're all just surviving day to day, the least of our worries will be a Patriot Act, etc... who will have time to even care?

 

[SirRealism]

Coulter doesn't even understand current marriage laws, a blood test? Your tennis coach?

Is Billy O proud of the fact he doesn't understand economics? He doesn't even know who Keynes is....I hope he was playing dumb.

+1

I despise willful ignorance. But when you combine it with snide comments about correct pronunciations and dismiss any mention of an economic theory because of its age... you're just grabbing at straws. He's such a megalomaniac.

With guys like O'Reilly being as popular as he is, it's pretty easy to see why liberals see conservatives as oafs.

 

[Garb]

What exactly comes out of her mouth that scares you?

What should scare people is playing games with elections. It WILL be a Republican or Democrat elected in November 2012. BANK on it. And it WON'T be Ron Paul.

Nieve thinking that Ron Paul or ANY potential candidate like him will be elected is just crazy talk, and refusing to accept reality. We HAVE to start somewhere, and getting rid of Obama and the rest of his thugs HAS to be the first priority.

She supports the Patriot Act and the never ending wars. Yeah, Paul is a long shot, but that's beside the point. Like I stated before, I refuse to vote for a candidate who is going to advocate a bigger, more powerful federal government. All of these Republicans who "conservative" people like so much are treasonous, lying snakes.

 

[Garb]

We HAVE to correct the financial situation first. While not perfect or what we really want, ANY of the Republicans would do a better job correcting the path the economy is on now. That is the first step, getting the economy back on track. THEN we can afford the "luxury" of taking on the other major problems we face. Sitting by and allowing the United States to be turned into a third world country make all the other problems small IMO. If we're all just surviving day to day, the least of our worries will be a Patriot Act, etc... who will have time to even care?

You think Palin will address the spending situation?

Sarah Palin the 'Earmark Queen' of AK Left Wasilla $20 Million in Debt | Crooks and Liars

Post-Palin Alaska has largest debt burden in US | The Raw Story

 

[SirRealism]

I agree with this analysis, but getting rid of Obama should not be our number one goal. Getting a candidate that actually plans on doing something about the situation we're is more important. Contrary to what others on this board think, I don't see most of the Republicans as the lesser of two evils. In fact, they tend to advocate things almost everyone on this forum hates. I'll be voting for Paul or Johnson. Not because I think they'll win, but because I refuse to support someone just because they're not Obama. That's how Obama won the 2008 election, and that's how the next a**wipe will win it.

+1 Voting your conscience... novel concept!

By casting a vote for a candidate I don't respect and who doesn't share my vision for the country, I'm lying. It's like promoting a kid who can't read... or rewarding a toddler for bad behavior... or bailing out a company who continues to make bad decisions. If they want my vote, they need to earn it.

The Republican party can ***** all it wants after the election about how "independents" or "libertarians" guaranteed a Democrat win. Well, the plain truth is that, if Obama wins, it's because more people believe in his vision than believe in [fill in your favorite statist Republican]'s vision.

 

[RockofStrength]

+1 Voting your conscience... novel concept!

By casting a vote for a candidate I don't respect and who doesn't share my vision for the country, I'm lying. It's like promoting a kid who can't read... or rewarding a toddler for bad behavior... or bailing out a company who continues to make bad decisions. If they want my vote, they need to earn it.

The Republican party can ***** all it wants after the election about how "independents" or "libertarians" guaranteed a Democrat win. Well, the plain truth is that, if Obama wins, it's because more people believe in his vision than believe in [fill in your favorite statist Republican]'s vision.

Indeed. If they continually see that the "feel-good" false conservatism of the GOP results in staggering losses to the united front of the Democrats, they'll have to change their tune. Either they'll just ditch the conservative bent and go join the Democrats, or they'll have to actually support those half-forgotten rights of states and citizens that they ought to be supporting.

The status-quo, the "we suck, but not as bad as him" thing doesn't heal any damage and gives many active but ill-informed conservatives a false figurehead to rally around.