Or perhaps if Biden and the Ukraine government weren't skimming so much off the top it would be enough. Why do they need money, anyway. Can they somehow buy war materiel faster from some other source than we can supply it? Is there a cash market for 155mm shells somewhere?We just keep giving them enough to keep fighting, we have never given then enough to win. If we had given them enough to win in the beginning it would be over and it would have cost less.
We just keep giving them enough to keep fighting, we have never given then enough to win. If we had given them enough to win in the beginning it would be over and it would have cost less.
Uhhhhh I was told Russia was bankrupted by war and sanctions and on the verge of collapseRussia is spending surprisingly little on its war on Ukraine
An analysis from the Economist suggests Russia's war spending is a small amount on a historical basis.markets.businessinsider.com
Just US donated funds have been more than Russia has spent. Russia is spending roughly 3% of their GDP on the war or 67 billion in 2022 and roughly on track for that amount in 2023(per https://www.economist.com/graphic-d...is-russia-spending-on-its-invasion-of-ukraine ). Russia still had a budget surplus in 2022 and this years will be far larger than lasts.
Just money can not win a war.
QFTOr perhaps if Biden and the Ukraine government weren't skimming so much off the top it would be enough. Why do they need money, anyway. Can they somehow buy war materiel faster from some other source than we can supply it? Is there a cash market for 155mm shells somewhere?
I remember when the experts said Kyiv would fall in 72 hours. I will say I'm surprised it's gone this long
The other 10% is ... err ... spoken forMoney, money, money...
...money [90%] without accountability...
Those are the same experts who said Kabul WOULDN'T fall in 72 hours.I remember when the experts said Kyiv would fall in 72 hours. I will say I'm surprised it's gone this long