Russia vs. Ukraine Part 3

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Thor

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Jan 18, 2014
    10,732
    113
    Could be anywhere
    We just keep giving them enough to keep fighting, we have never given then enough to win. If we had given them enough to win in the beginning it would be over and it would have cost less.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,271
    149
    Columbus, OH
    We just keep giving them enough to keep fighting, we have never given then enough to win. If we had given them enough to win in the beginning it would be over and it would have cost less.
    Or perhaps if Biden and the Ukraine government weren't skimming so much off the top it would be enough. Why do they need money, anyway. Can they somehow buy war materiel faster from some other source than we can supply it? Is there a cash market for 155mm shells somewhere?
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,525
    149
    Indiana
    We just keep giving them enough to keep fighting, we have never given then enough to win. If we had given them enough to win in the beginning it would be over and it would have cost less.

    Just US donated funds have been more than Russia has spent. Russia is spending roughly 3% of their GDP on the war or 67 billion in 2022 and roughly on track for that amount in 2023(per https://www.economist.com/graphic-d...is-russia-spending-on-its-invasion-of-ukraine ). Russia still had a budget surplus in 2022 and this years will be far larger than lasts.

    Just money can not win a war.
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,525
    149
    Indiana
    Senate Republicans have tied Biden's foreign defense funding to tackling the migrant crisis at the southern border, prolonging the Ukraine aid holdup further, and maybe indefinitely.

    Interestingly, the Senate forum that Zelensky was to address involved a classified briefing. Likely he realized he was not going to convince anyone, and his 'star status' has long since been in decline. At this moment, even the mayor of Kyiv is attacking him, calling Zelensky an "autocrat" and "corrupt" - and saying Ukraine is losing because of this.

     

    Ark

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Feb 18, 2017
    6,864
    113
    Indy

    Just US donated funds have been more than Russia has spent. Russia is spending roughly 3% of their GDP on the war or 67 billion in 2022 and roughly on track for that amount in 2023(per https://www.economist.com/graphic-d...is-russia-spending-on-its-invasion-of-ukraine ). Russia still had a budget surplus in 2022 and this years will be far larger than lasts.

    Just money can not win a war.
    Uhhhhh I was told Russia was bankrupted by war and sanctions and on the verge of collapse
     
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 9, 2022
    2,305
    113
    Bloomington
    Or perhaps if Biden and the Ukraine government weren't skimming so much off the top it would be enough. Why do they need money, anyway. Can they somehow buy war materiel faster from some other source than we can supply it? Is there a cash market for 155mm shells somewhere?
    QFT
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,525
    149
    Indiana




     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    9,525
    149
    Indiana

    Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) said Sunday that the United States needs to accept that Ukraine will likely need to “cede some territory” to Russia to end the fighting.

    Vance told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “State of the Union” that he is opposed to sending more aid to Ukraine because he does not believe the country will ever be able to overpower Russia. He questioned why sending billions in aid to Ukraine is going to help the country at this point in its war against Russia, considering previous aid has yet to end the war.

    “What’s in America’s best interest is to accept Ukraine is going to have to cede some territory to the Russians, and we need to bring this war to a close,” Vance said. “But when I think about the great human tragedy here, hundreds of thousands of Eastern Europeans innocent have been killed in this conflict. The thing that’s in our interest and in theirs is to stop the killing.”
     

    snapping turtle

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Dec 5, 2009
    6,534
    113
    Madison county
    Seems like the FUSA is sending a major general to uk rain. Looks like a new battle strategy is in order. Maybe the little singing Man is falling out of favor in with the powers that be.

    I hope that a peace could be achieved but I do believe that will not happen soon.
     

    KellyinAvon

    Blue-ID Mafia Consigliere
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Dec 22, 2012
    25,211
    150
    Avon

    So let me see if I've got this straight...

    The Rooskie military, that has been bogged down in a quagmire, for almost 2 years, in Ukraine, in a conflict that looks like WWI with drones, where they had to break out T-60 series tanks, over a year ago, because their War Reserve Materiel was complete crap, is a threat?
     
    Top Bottom