In yet another attempt to further degrade the 10th Amendment, a trio of senators are proposing to raise the age at which a person can obtain a drivers license to 18. They'd only be able to get a restricted permit at 16, rather than a license. It's bad enough that one must have permission to travel the roads in this country, placing further restrictions on who is allowed is too much again, and forcing the states to adhere to yet another federal mandate....ah, who am I kidding? There's loads of people out there, (and likely here) who will think it's the greatest idea since sliced bread.
via USA Today
via USA Today
More statist nonsense at the source.Every state except North Dakota has a licensing program for teens that includes three phrases. The strongest programs include restrictions on nighttime driving, limits on the number of teen passengers and a minimum age of 16 for getting a learner's permit. Forty-two states allow learner's permits before age 16.
Programs reduce deaths
There is little debate about the effectiveness of good GDL programs on highway safety. States that impose major restrictions have seen crash reductions of 10%-30%, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. In Massachusetts, fatal crashes involving drivers younger than 18 dropped 75% in the three years after the state implemented tougher restrictions for young drivers; injury crashes involving these drivers fell 38%.
What is sparking controversy is a key component of the proposed federal legislation: It raises the age at which young drivers can get a learner's permit from 14 or 15 in most states to 16; it also sets 18 as the minimum age at which young drivers can get an unrestricted license.