The biggest election issue no one is talking about

[rambone]

​

The National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 (NDAA) was signed by President Obama on New Years Eve last year. It allows soldiers to arrest U.S. citizens on U.S. soil. It allows Americans to be held in overseas military prison camps, indefinitely without trial. Yet with a straight face the media tells us that PBS is a legitimate election issue, and which parts of Obamacare the candidates would like to hang onto.

Something is seriously wrong with this picture.

NDAA: The Biggest Election Issue No One's Talking About | Cracked.com

 

[Sgt.Striker]

i did not know this, im no supreme court judge or anything but i would guess that this is a very sneaky way of using a back door approach to subverting posse comitatus. pay attention people

 

[rambone]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1yY3NCiMVQ[/ame]

 

[John James]

Nobody cares.

Haven't you heard?

This election is about how the government can "create jobs".... never mind that the government can do nothing without taking something.

People want their "free ****". Liberty be damned.

 

[Blackhawk2001]

TSIF TSIF

 

[John James]

TSIF TSIF

Damn straight!

No vigilance required here.

 

[lucky4034]

Nobody cares.

Haven't you heard?

This election is about how the government can "create jobs".... never mind that the government can do nothing without taking something.

So thats why they don't mention the Federal Reserve and its QE3

 

[jedi]

oh rambone THE [STRIKE]PEOPLE[/STRIKE] SHEEP don't care about that. They are too busy with...

and

and buying

So please stop trying to tell them about anything that does not relate to those things and enjoy the

 

[EvilBlackGun]

So here's 8 of us who realize the need for preps.

Where are the othr 23,000± (or was it 43,000) INGO-ers who claim gun-toting citizenship? I ain't gonna feed ANY of THEM!!

 

[Trooper]

i did not know this, im no supreme court judge or anything but i would guess that this is a very sneaky way of using a back door approach to subverting posse comitatus. pay attention people

Posse Comitatus is merely a law that congress can change at any time. And has. It only regulates the actions of the Army and the Air Force (which came out of the Army), Navy and Marines are not covered by the law thus can be used to enforce federal laws.

What you really have to remember is that our military is not all that large. Nor all that willing to be used against US citizens. It would take a military of 15 million to really be effective as law enforcement. And then who would police them?

 

[jedi]

Posse Comitatus is merely a law that congress can change at any time. And has. It only regulates the actions of the Army and the Air Force (which came out of the Army), Navy and Marines are not covered by the law thus can be used to enforce federal laws.

What you really have to remember is that our military is not all that large. Nor all that willing to be used against US citizens. It would take a military of 15 million to really be effective as law enforcement. And then who would police them?

People wise perhaps but 1 armed civilian <> 1 solider in a tank. Have you though of that?

 

[Trooper]

People wise perhaps but 1 armed civilian <> 1 solider in a tank. Have you though of that?

Armor is not all that effective in Afghanistan or Iraq. Our military is stronger in open terrority rather than in urban areas. Thus they are vunerable to insurgencies. It would take an overwhelming force to control a population and it would take very few to counter that force. At that point only genocide would work.

Then what would keep the troops in line? That many young men with weapons would be a mess waiting to happen.

Frankly the feminists would never trust men enough to allow such a force. They would rather use health care as a backdoor control over human behavior. Plus they see war as a male activity and want to ban it. Once war is gone then they could justify banning weapons. Ultimate goal is to have an emasculated population.

 

[24Carat]

Armor is not all that effective in Afghanistan or Iraq. Our military is stronger in open terrority rather than in urban areas. Thus they are vunerable to insurgencies. It would take an overwhelming force to control a population and it would take very few to counter that force. At that point only genocide would work.

Then what would keep the troops in line? That many young men with weapons would be a mess waiting to happen.

Frankly the feminists would never trust men enough to allow such a force. They would rather use health care as a backdoor control over human behavior. Plus they see war as a male activity and want to ban it. Once war is gone then they could justify banning weapons. Ultimate goal is to have an emasculated population.

Reading this my "buddies" just started to ache !

 

[Stschil]

This and about 80,000 other pages of 'legislation' that passes though the bowls of our so called representatives.

Forget it, OP, Romeny is going to save us from all this

 

[ZombieApocolypse]

Any time anyone asks me why im not voting for Obamney, this is in the top three reasons

 

[FortWayneGunfighter]

.

What you really have to remember is that our military is not all that large. Nor all that willing to be used against US citizens. It would take a military of 15 million to really be effective as law enforcement. And then who would police them?

As a Marine and Indiana gun owner i would not follow any suck order unless said civilians should be arrested for committing crimes that would get them arrested by police and because the police are otherwise unavailable to do their job or are there with me and need help.

 

[rambone]

 

[Kutnupe14]

Why argue about something they both agree with?

 

[Lex Concord]

oh rambone THE [STRIKE]PEOPLE[/STRIKE] SHEEP don't care about that. They are too busy with...

and

and buying

So please stop trying to tell them about anything that does not relate to those things and enjoy the

I couldn't agree more.

Go Bears!

 

[Double T]

Actually, I've been asking about it a lot on FB and twitter.

History is repeating itself.