The most inexperienced candidate in generations is...

[Designer99]

 

[LEaSH]

Dang.

It's a fricken graph with statistics onit.

 

[threefiftyfour]

Wait, Obama has exec exp and Romney doesn't? I keep hearing about all of the businesses that he ran into the ground and sold off to China. Does that not count?

 

[eldirector]

I thought it was a graph showing career politicians.....

 

[lashicoN]

Wow, looks like it's a close one. They both have about the same executive experience. How does military experience help prepare one to be the President? Even working in Congress...doesn't amount to any executive experience, because they are two separate branches of government.

I notice there is no bar extention for experience coping with the real world. Riding in a tank gets you Presidential experience points, but balancing the budget of the company you own does not? Hmm... looks to me like this chart is simply experience working within the government. Romney has just a little sliver of experience taking our money? I like that.

 

[rambone]

They forgot to add when Romney ran the Olympics and lobbied for record amounts of Federal taxdollar$.

 

[Blackhawk2001]

I have to laugh about this: Obama never ran his first lemonade stand until he got elected to public office - and then he either didn't vote, or didn't show up most of the time. And not counting experience in the "Public Sector" is a silly way to imply a lack of competence in leadership.

 

[Expat]

All that government experience hasn't seemed to be working out well for us so far...

 

[Kagnew]

I have to laugh about this: Obama never ran his first lemonade stand until he got elected to public office - and then he either didn't vote, or didn't show up most of the time. And not counting experience in the "Public Sector" is a silly way to imply a lack of competence in leadership.

I do believe that this "graph" would qualify as some more bovine scatology.

 

[Rob377]

The fact that he has the least experience as a career politician/gov't employee strikes me as a feature, not a bug.

 

[Llamaguy]

Looks to me that the least experienced candidate has won with the exception of Nixon and Johnson. We know how well those went over...

 

[TopDog]

Another useless chart that is chocked full of erroneous statistics that reflect pretty colors and little else. Epic Fail for the chart.

 

[Carmelbythecorn]

They don't need experience, they have their globalist owners behind them telling them what to do.

And we're all glad too - remember?!

 

[Zoub]

I have to laugh about this: Obama never ran his first lemonade stand until he got elected to public office - and then he either didn't vote, or didn't show up most of the time. And not counting experience in the "Public Sector" is a silly way to imply a lack of competence in leadership.

Amen

In general, Soldiers make lousy Politicians and Politicians make lousy Soldiers.

This Graph would show Trumka to be the most qualified to lead and he does not lead, he rules.

For the people, by the people

The President needs to lead. Not rule, not tell, not mandate, not point his finger at us. Make decisions and lead, if he or she ahs respect from the others, they will follow. That is the main reason some Soldiers end up being Politicians, they already know how to lead. Same goes for Corp Execs. They are not trying to win popularity contests, they are trying to lead their team to victory. Same reason some Soldiers do well in Corp America, again they have true leadership skills and have been tested.

Generally speaking leaders also identify well with their subordinates. I have never once heard Obama say word one about any tough job he ever had. Not a physically demanding one or an emotionally demanding one. He never dug a ditch, bailed hay or told 300 people they were going to be laid off.

I will measure any Man or Woman by the sum total of his life, not a snapshot others choose for me to see.