THE NO WEAPONS ALLOWED SIGN.

[Beau]

What Jesus said.

 

[wtfd661]

What Melensdad said.

I'm backing JetGirl's play

What she said!!

 

[hopper68]

I never agree with anyone. They will put it in their sig line and rub people's noses in it.

 

[2A_Tom]

What taylor 1911 said in #12 permalink and what buckstops here in #18 permalink

 

[looney2ns]

But you were held up when you signed the contract with Aarons.

 

[melensdad]

What Melensdad said.

What Jetgirl said

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

There's a lot of he-said, she-said in this thread.

 

[moosebag]

I'm not sayin anathin.

 

[Bill B]

I never agree with anyone. They will put it in their sig line and rub people's noses in it.

Dude, that's gonna be my new sig....oh, and what jetgirl said.

 

[CitiusFortius]

My favorite part of the story is this: Why did somebody (presumably unarmed) approach you about your weapon?

They have banned guns because guns are dangerous.

If you have a gun and are therefore dangerous, then they should fear you right?

If they don't fear you, as evidenced by the fact that they have no problem CONFRONTING you, then why do they care if you have one?

 

[femurphy77]

Ditto!



(What sign?)

 

[Roadie]

But you were held up when you signed the contract with Aarons.

Hmm, Contract = Contractual Interest = No Trespass

 

[jbombelli]

Did somebody say something?

 

[Bill of Rights]

That's what
........--She

 

[Bill B]

Hmm, Contract = Contractual Interest = No Trespass

There was a recent court case that argued just that. The court ruled that you must have a contractual interest in the real property, ie, the real estate or the building.
I'd look it up but I'm too lazy. It was discussed here on INGO.

 

[Roadie]

There was a recent court case that argued just that. The court ruled that you must have a contractual interest in the real property, ie, the real estate or the building.
I'd look it up but I'm too lazy. It was discussed here on INGO.

Yeah, I vaguely remembered that too. Just thought I would stir the pot

 

[IndyGunSafety]

Hmm, Contract = Contractual Interest = No Trespass

That IS an interesting point once a contract exists. Does the contract have to involve the PROPERTY to be a "contractual interest"? Are the police going to know that or just haul your @$$ out of there? Hmmmmm....


EDIT: Posted this without reading Bill's post.

 

[2A_Tom]

Ic 76-24-2-1.5. It is the responsibility of patrons of any business to stop before entering any real property and examine the entire entrance way carefuly to insure that they are aware of any and all precautionary signage, such as but not limited to no shirt no shoes no service, no smoking, no brasiers, no firearms and etc.

 

[leftsock]

Ic 76-24-2-1.5. It is the responsibility of patrons of any business to stop before entering any real property and examine the entire entrance way carefuly to insure that they are aware of any and all precautionary signage, such as but not limited to no shirt no shoes no service, no smoking, no brasiers, no firearms and etc.

Oooooooh yeah!

 

[DRob]

Yeah

Yeah, I vaguely remembered that too. Just thought I would stir the pot

The pot Roadie stirred!