I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you.ABC’s Martha Raddatz to illegal alien who crossed the border: “Would you have tried to do this when Donald Trump was president?”
Illegal alien: “Definitely not.”
Raddatz: “Did you come here because Joe Biden was elected president?”
Illegal: “Basically” pic.twitter.com/OsxvdG8xO0
— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) March 21, 2021
I am so disappointed in myself not to see at the time how we were rope-a-doped by the republicans on immigration, in particular, for too long.I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you.
Trump was the exception in doing what was right for the country. Whilr the Ds wanted fresh voters and the Rs wanted sub-minimum wage labor and neither wanted the border problem solved, convinced most people it can't be done, then, oh ****, Trump does it quite well in spite of most every court on the continent trying to stop him.I am so disappointed in myself not to see at the time how we were rope-a-doped by the republicans on immigration, in particular, for too long.
Trump has been called, correctly by my estimation, the great awakening. His rise included so many outing themselves for who they really are.
The central power staying within those enumerated powers would have been a great start.Remember when folks thought it would be a good idea to delegate enumerated powers to the central state in order to defend those delegating said powers?
If one cannot recognize how far off the rails this **** show has gone, one may want to consider how blind, deaf, and dumb they truly have become.
I agree. The Constitution set definite limits. To wit, the federal government has only the authority specifically delegated to it in article I section 8 , yet we see a majority of its actions falling squarely outside those parameters, including behaviors expressly prohibited.Granted I am far from an expert on law, but it would seem to me an agent has no authority beyond that delegated to it.
No doubt an expert will be along to explain how this is not so.
No, they want Texas and Florida first...Is the plan really to fly them to northern red states?
That constitutional passage, and the 9th and 10th amendments, along with the preamble to the bill of rights of course.I agree. The Constitution set definite limits. To wit, the federal government has only the authority specifically delegated to it in article I section 8 , yet we see a majority of its actions falling squarely outside those parameters, including behaviors expressly prohibited.
You're right. I am sure the usual suspects will be along to tell us that the Supreme Court (Red Frank Packed Edition) ruled it constitutional therefore it constitutional
One of the sources of wrong decisions from the SC is Red Frank's 4 terms which allowed him to leave us a court with 9/9 leftist justices. Until Trump's appointments the best we ever had was a 4/1/4 split allowing us the status quo but no gains in terms of constitutional government. Now it seems too late especially with Roberts taking a left turn.That constitutional passage, and the 9th and 10th amendments, along with the preamble to the bill of rights of course.
On another forum I have gotten the, the supreme Court found differently, what seems to be lost on those who wished you take that tact is that the supreme Court has been demonstrably wrong more than once. They have overruled prior precedents more than once. And currently it is without doubt that the supreme Court is neutered by the threat of being packed. Therefore I always return back to the source documents and the contemporaneous body of work.
Photos from inside detention facility...
I don't know what to think about this.