un anti gun crap omg.

[xring62]

 

[BehindBlueI's]

Fake.

PolitiFact | United Nations document shared on social media says civilian gun confiscation is in the works for United States

 

[xring62]

Who knows, but, it IS what 'they' want

 

[xring62]

I checked that out ,this quote is strange >>>In addition, Haq said, "there is no such body as a ‘Civilian Weapons Confiscation Study Group.’ Nor does the United Nations involve itself in confiscating weapons from member states."
I searched for such a 'group' and it does exist.

 

[BehindBlueI's]

I checked that out ,this quote is strange >>>In addition, Haq said, "there is no such body as a ‘Civilian Weapons Confiscation Study Group.’ Nor does the United Nations involve itself in confiscating weapons from member states."
I searched for such a 'group' and it does exist.

Link?

 

[BravoMike]

Link?

Is this the sound of crickets?

I couldn't find anything close to that group. The only thing I could find was this... http://www.un.org/disarmament/ Of course that has been around for a while now.

 

[jbombelli]

I checked that out ,this quote is strange >>>In addition, Haq said, "there is no such body as a ‘Civilian Weapons Confiscation Study Group.’ Nor does the United Nations involve itself in confiscating weapons from member states."
I searched for such a 'group' and it does exist.

Link?

Yup. Link?

 

[traderdan]

Fake.

PolitiFact | United Nations document shared on social media says civilian gun confiscation is in the works for United States

Who controls Politifacts? Whether or not the document is real, I feel sure that this is an agenda that is in play. Our current administration would like nothing better than total disarmament of civilians.

 

[jbombelli]

Who controls Politifacts? Whether or not the document is real, I feel sure that this is an agenda that is in play. Our current administration would like nothing better than total disarmament of civilians.

We all know that. We don't need liars parading around fake documents to convince us of that. All that does is make us look stupid when we talk about it.

 

[BehindBlueI's]

Who controls Politifacts? Whether or not the document is real, I feel sure that this is an agenda that is in play. Our current administration would like nothing better than total disarmament of civilians.

Politifacts is far from the only ones who've pointed out its fake. See what the NRA has to say about it. Who controls the NRA? If anything, the NRA frequently overstates threats as part of their marketing. You can't convince members to contribute more, or new folks to join, with a memo that reads "nothing new this week".

Its increasingly obvious that people have their minds already made up and facts are irrelevant. If something that confirms your assumptions is a forgery, who cares, we all know it COULD have been real, right? Like Bombelli said, it just makes us look like stupid, and I'll add paranoid.

 

[bingley]

Its increasingly obvious that people have their minds already made up and facts are irrelevant. If something that confirms your assumptions is a forgery, who cares, we all know it COULD have been real, right? Like Bombelli said, it just makes us look like stupid, and I'll add paranoid.

I'm not paranoid! You're just all against me! You keep bringing facts that challenge my assumptions!

 

[1911ly]

The UN can't over ride our constitution. Well I guess if the UN wanted they could band together and take us over. But enough of us won't let that happen. I don't think that is going to happen.

 

[Redhorse]

The UN can't over ride our constitution. Well I guess if the UN wanted they could band together and take us over. But enough of us won't let that happen. I don't think that is going to happen.

They could gang up on us and they would win, but by time they finally did win, what would they have? A bunch of sheep and rumble? We'd fight back, civilians and military both, and sure they'd win, but what'd they prove? Plus there'd be so much inside fighting between them it's ridiculous.

Or we would just hold the world hostage with our nuclear bombs.

 

[BehindBlueI's]

Setting aside out completely and utterly far-fetched such a scenario is, even if the UN did wish to invade the US it couldn't legally do so unless we agreed to it.

The UN Security Council is the body that must authorize military actions, peacekeeping missions, etc.

The US is a permanent member of the UN Security Council.

All permanent members have veto power. All five (China, US, Russia, France, and United Kingdom) must agree (either vote "yes" or abstain) as a single veto cannot be overridden even by a otherwise unanimous council.

We would have to vote for our own invasion.

Also, given that the UN doesn't have its own troops, who would be supplying the invasion?

 

[metaldog]

​WOLVERINES!!!

 

[netsecurity]

All that is, is the plan that The UK and Australia have ALREADY executed successfully. Guns are basically completely illegal, unless you are a farmer--but even then, you can only have a SINGLE SHOT shotgun, AND, it must be locked up, and unloaded, at all times (they come and inspect because they have a registry).


American politics went British after the election of Barack Obama. He copied their healthcare plan (or took a huge step "forward" to it), and he has basically ALL of the same goals as the liberal politicians in Britain. Why you ask? It is because they are all LIBERAL SOCIALISTS. Liberalism has always been a global phenomenon. The liberals today in America may be descendents of the loyalists in the days of the founding fathers--those who depend on government for everything, and cannot think of life without it.

EDIT: One more thing...we all know that all liberal Democrats want exactly what is written on that fake UN form, and for that reason, it isn't totally fake. Wake up if you disagree! So I say it is a good email and a good post, and you should pass the word around, to pass some truth around instead of the lies we hear on the media and from politicians.

 

[Dead Duck]

We all know that. We don't need liars parading around fake documents to convince us of that. All that does is make us look stupid when we talk about it.

That's Right -

I don't need any help making me looking stupid. I can do that all by myself...........wait

 

[BehindBlueI's]

All that is, is the plan that The UK and Australia have ALREADY executed successfully. Guns are basically completely illegal, unless you are a farmer--but even then, you can only have a SINGLE SHOT shotgun, AND, it must be locked up, and unloaded, at all times (they come and inspect because they have a registry).
.

That's untrue, at least as far as Australia goes. While their gun laws are extremely restrictive, its not quite to the point of only single shot shotguns for farmers. I don't know about the UK, but Australians can get bolt action rifles, both rim and center fire, for example.

 

[Redhorse]

Setting aside out completely and utterly far-fetched such a scenario is, even if the UN did wish to invade the US it couldn't legally do so unless we agreed to it.

The UN Security Council is the body that must authorize military actions, peacekeeping missions, etc.

The US is a permanent member of the UN Security Council.

All permanent members have veto power. All five (China, US, Russia, France, and United Kingdom) must agree (either vote "yes" or abstain) as a single veto cannot be overridden even by a otherwise unanimous council.

We would have to vote for our own invasion.

Also, given that the UN doesn't have its own troops, who would be supplying the invasion?

Well if they decided that they would confiscate our guns, the us government would have to have someone help them because I doubt the whole populous could be disarmed voluntarily.

 

[HoughMade]

...and when I first saw this topic title I was like, omg, fur shur, the un is like totally bffs with the brady campaign, lol