most of them post signs saying no loaded guns...I've been told that its for liability.
No, they don't, and no, it's not. That's pretty much the gist of the last 50 posts in this thread.
Thanks for the condensed version. After reading thru the first two pages I wanted to see if the book ended the same way it started. It appears after NINE pages it's still oc vs cc, or was it glock vs 1911 or mosin vs ?
They're on their side, obviously. And I would be too if I had to worry about idiot douchebags coonfingering a loaded firearm with patrons within striking range.
What is coonfingering? I have seen this term used several times in this thread, but have never heard it before. What does it mean regarding guns and concealed carry?
Please note, this is not in purple.
I agree. It just seems to me that it would be hard to stay in business if you are telling the majority of your prospective customers that you should shop somewhere else. I know I would not disarm myself to shop there.First, what a fun thread
Second, if you don't like it then don't shop there. I don't shop there because of their rules.
Gander Mountain, Dick's, and Indy Gun Safety all have acceptable signs as well. If it were really an insurance issue, you can bet stores like Gander Mountain would have different signs.
The logic in your last paragraph is impeccable sir.People don't read signs. People don't follow the four rules. People can shop where they choose too.
I fail to see the reason for butthurt when you tell a proprietor you are in violation of their policies and they forcibly ask you to comply.
Was Willie Wonka wrong when he yelled at Charlie at the end? It was the final test and won him a chocolate factory. OP, did you consider maybe you just missed out on owning a gunshop?
JG Not Coonfingering;
IF A PLACE OF BUSINESS HAS A SIGN POSTED SAYING "NO CONCEALED CARRY", THEN WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? THE BUSINESS HAS LEGAL OBLIGATIONS AND INSURANCE GUIDLINES TO CONSIDER.