what's the most you'd pay for a kel tec sub2000?

[Harleyrider_50]

Oh........I think I would pay up to $1.47 , after all, it is a Kel-Tec.

........'At name it'self jus' screams.......'Cheap-o junk'.........

 

[Win52C]

My opinion is 0$. Cheap construction and no real practical use pair that with uncomfortable to shoot and you have the sub 2000

Agreed. Junk with a Capitol J. No matter how you dress it up. IMO

 

[aeroe]

They're kind of hard to come by.

What's the most you'd pay?

Probably $400. But as a lefty, I don't think I'd keep it. I'm also not really interested in reselling it online either for a quick buck.

 

[uberpeck]

I enjoy shooting mine. Paid 350 for it. I also haven't had any trouble with any of my Keltecs. My Harley on the other hand...

 

[Street Glide 2013]

I can see why people might consider Kel-Tec’s cheap. They look the part and are mostly very low priced, but is that correct image? I have had zero performance issues with my Sub 2000 and that is running both high quality and cheap junk ammo in either Glock G22 OME or KCI extended mags.

I know people that have owned PF3AT and PF9 pistols with great performance and surprising accuracy.

I am not suggesting anyone should ditch their Glock or XD for a Kel-Tec, but how many of these over-dramatic negative reviews are from actual real-world experience?

 

[Tobryan]

Will they hit a basketball at 7 yds? With handloads?

 

[LD36]

After having HAD one, I'd pay nothing now. I paid about $279 brand new several years ago and found the gun to be very unreliable. Typically atleast one malfunction per magazine. This time around I spent a bit more and got a much higher quality Beretta CX4 Storm carbine and couldn't be happier. Orion Arms in Jeffersonville has them (or is expecting them any day now) for around $650.

 

[Fordtough25]

I could have bought one a couple years ago for $325, passed sadly. So I wouldn't pay any more than that probably or I wouldn't be able to sleep at night. Lol