Atlantic City officers brutally beat man, use an attack dog to gnaw on his neck

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    ATLANTIC CITY, NJ — Security cameras captured a disturbing video of a group of Atlantic City police officers assaulting a man, beating him mercilessly with blunt weapons, and finally siccing an attack dog on his neck and head as he lay helplessly face-down in the street. The shocking abuse seems to be done with the approval of the police chief, who watched the video and saw no reason to discipline his officers.

    David Connor Castellani, age 20, was removed from the Tropicana Resort and Casino on June 5th for being a few months under age 21. Footage provided by casino showed what happened outside on Pacific Avenue.

    Around 3:10 a.m., video shows Castellani surrounded by at least 4 police officers on the sidewalk outside the casino. With his hands raised in the air, officers searched his pockets. They talked to him briefly, and quickly let him go.

    After about a minute-long phone call, he returned to the group of officers, raises his hands, and apparently asked the officers a question. The silent video does not hold details of this conversation, but Castellani’s parents later narrated that their son was asking them if he could return to the car which he arrived in, evidently on casino property. Details of this conversation are not known, but it resulted with Castellani being quickly turned away, with tensions raised on both sides.

    Castellani crossed the street and walked away from the officers. He was obviously upset at the interaction. Several times as he walked away, he turned around as if to react to an ongoing conversation being shouted between the officers and himself. He can be seen responding to the officers, raising his hands excitedly. He paused briefly to shout down the street but continuing to walk the other direction, widening the distance between himself and the officers.

    After a heated verbal exchange that lasted roughly a minute, the surveillance video shows four officers running into the frame and assaulting Castellani. His hands were clearly visible and held down at his sides. There was no threat posed at all. “They bum-rushed the kid,” his father later described.

    Castinalli was beaten mercilessly with punches, kicks, knees, and a baton. One officer knelt on his head. Another beat his calves with a club. Finally a 6th officer showed up and immediately sicced an attack dog on the man, laying face down. The German Shepherd clamped down on his neck and actually dragged him several feet, then reinserted its fangs into his head with subsequent bites. The dog's handler simultaneously punched Castenalli in the head.

    Who do you think was charged with Assault? Not the violent assailants. Police claimed that Castenalli choked the police dog while it made a meal of his skull, and claimed that he managed to punch a police officer during the onslaught of brutality.

    Following the gratuitous beating, some of the gang members stood around laughing and one even appears to take a picture of the victim with his cell phone.

    Unsurprisingly, the chief sees no reason to discipline his henchmen, charges have been laid on the victim, and the bloodthirsty cops and their ravenous attack dog are still on the streets.

    READ MORE :: Gang of Atlantic City officers brutally beat man, release an attack dog to gnaw on his neck | Police State USA

     
    Last edited:

    steveh_131

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    10,046
    83
    Porter County
    I'm just glad the officers made it home safe that night.

    I would like to hear the details of their call for backup.

    'We've got a 197 in progress. Suspect is on the ground receiving a brutal gang beatdown. Send backup ASAP, preferably a K9 unit that can eat his face while I take a selfie."
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,458
    149
    Napganistan
    While I'd need to watch the video more closely to see which officer was doing what, that K9 officer was way over the top. I've never seen a K9 used in that manner. I've never seen officers on the ground with a suspect stop fighting and get up to let the K9 into it. While I cannot speak for ACPD policies, ours would NEVER allow a K9 officer to do this. That K9 officer's actions could easily push him outside the realm of qualified immunity and the target of Federal civil rights litigation. The others might as well...maybe, but that K9 officer should be bought and paid for.
     

    g00n24

    Expert
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Aug 14, 2009
    1,389
    48
    IN
    While I'd need to watch the video more closely to see which officer was doing what, that K9 officer was way over the top. I've never seen a K9 used in that manner. I've never seen officers on the ground with a suspect stop fighting and get up to let the K9 into it. While I cannot speak for ACPD policies, ours would NEVER allow a K9 officer to do this. That K9 officer's actions could easily push him outside the realm of qualified immunity and the target of Federal civil rights litigation. The others might as well...maybe, but that K9 officer should be bought and paid for.
    Yea that's what I thought was most disturbing when the other officers got out of the way so the K9 could attack...freaking unbelievable (although not really). I guess what's more disturbing is the chief not seeing anything at all wrong with what was done.
     

    Birds Away

    ex CZ afficionado.
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    18   0   0
    Aug 29, 2011
    76,248
    113
    Monticello
    IMHO he was definitely resisting. He looked like he was talking :poop: all the way down the sidewalk. When the cops let you walk, then walk. I am not saying this was all on the up and up, particularly the canine. But, really, it looks like this kid was really begging for a good whoopin'. Those kinds of requests rarely go unheeded for long. It's a shame it came to this but he really brought it on himself. It went way too far for sure.
     

    buckstopshere

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Jan 18, 2010
    3,693
    48
    Greenwood
    Isn't the police chief Nuckie Thompsons brother? Maybe this guy was selling hooch and not giving Nuck his cut.

    It's just appalling what is going on in this country. It just begs the question, how often does this happen when no camera is around?
     

    buckstopshere

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Jan 18, 2010
    3,693
    48
    Greenwood
    IMHO he was definitely resisting. He looked like he was talking :poop: all the way down the sidewalk. When the cops let you walk, then walk. I am not saying this was all on the up and up, particularly the canine. But, really, it looks like this kid was really begging for a good whoopin'. Those kinds of requests rarely go unheeded for long. It's a shame it came to this but he really brought it on himself. It went way too far for sure.

    I disagree. What happened to sticks and stones? The kid has clearly walked away. Whatever insults hurled about the LEOs mother doesn't warrant a response from the LEOs. They're supposed to be the professionals.

    If you and this guy got into a disagreement and he walked away then started shouting obscenities at you, would you have responded with an ass whoopin? If so, do you think you wouldn't be going to jail? Why is it different for the police?
     

    lucky4034

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Jan 14, 2012
    3,789
    48
    I disagree. What happened to sticks and stones? The kid has clearly walked away. Whatever insults hurled about the LEOs mother doesn't warrant a response from the LEOs. They're supposed to be the professionals.

    If you and this guy got into a disagreement and he walked away then started shouting obscenities at you, would you have responded with an ass whoopin? If so, do you think you wouldn't be going to jail? Why is it different for the police?

    It all depends on what was said... either way, the beating was way uncalled for.

    Let's pretend that whatever the young kid did warranted an arrest (which is unclear at this point). Then he definitely resisted and therefore tackling him and giving him a couple of whacks on the back to get him to cooperate is ok with me. However, once he was face down... regardless if he was squiggling or not, the threat to the police was gone. All that was left was for the officers to pull him arm around to his back and then cuff him. All of the blows they threw once he was flat on his stomach were uncalled for... the canine situation was WAY OVER THE TOP.

    They had him subdued and then had to let him go so the K-9 unit could chew his neck and face so they could subdue him again.
     

    j706

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    60   0   1
    Dec 4, 2008
    4,160
    48
    Lizton
    IMHO he was definitely resisting. He looked like he was talking :poop: all the way down the sidewalk. When the cops let you walk, then walk. I am not saying this was all on the up and up, particularly the canine. But, really, it looks like this kid was really begging for a good whoopin'. Those kinds of requests rarely go unheeded for long. It's a shame it came to this but he really brought it on himself. It went way too far for sure.

    I am going with this ^^. The boy was looking for trouble and he found it. He was clearly being disorderly and causing a scene. He also clearly resisted and at one time had his arms around the officer gun belt area.....very stupid move. I am not putting up with some idiot walking down a public street acting stupid where I work and no one else should either. As for the K9? I don't know on that one.
     

    steveh_131

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    10,046
    83
    Porter County
    I am going with this ^^. The boy was looking for trouble and he found it. He was clearly being disorderly and causing a scene. He also clearly resisted and at one time had his arms around the officer gun belt area.....very stupid move. I am not putting up with some idiot walking down a public street acting stupid where I work and no one else should either. As for the K9? I don't know on that one.

    Yeah totally. He also chipped the dog's tooth with his skull.
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,458
    149
    Napganistan
    I am going with this ^^. The boy was looking for trouble and he found it. He was clearly being disorderly and causing a scene. He also clearly resisted and at one time had his arms around the officer gun belt area.....very stupid move. I am not putting up with some idiot walking down a public street acting stupid where I work and no one else should either. As for the K9? I don't know on that one.
    Yeah, that why I am holding off on judgement for the initial officers. I do find that the more officers you have on a resister the more chance that someone will go overboard and it highlights poor takedown/combatives techniques. The more well versed an officer is in ground fighting/takedowns, the fewer officers will be required to handle a single resister and the level of force needed goes WAY down. However, I just cannot find a reason, tactic, excuse for introducing the K9 that would justify the behavior. In all but the most dire situations, once you go hands on, the K9 sits on the sidelines. If nothing else, the dog will just as likely lock onto the officers than the suspect in such close proximity and it adds nothing helpful into the situation.
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,458
    149
    Napganistan
    You can see at the 3:23 mark where he stains their boots with his blood. This is a clear case of boot staining. No civilized society should stand for this.
    I've had to wash blood off my boots after a resistor. But that was a HUGE Texas boy hell bent on fighting the popo...took 2 dogs (he fought both of them off), 2 tasers (didn't bother him), and about 4-5 officers (some with batons) to finally get him into cuffs all in the middle of I65 downtown...stopping all traffic. He was bleeding heavily and it did not phase him a bit...we all had blood on us after fighting him...yuk. Looked like a murder scene after we were done. Had to have fire wash the street down.
     

    buckstopshere

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Jan 18, 2010
    3,693
    48
    Greenwood
    It all depends on what was said... either way, the beating was way uncalled for.

    Let's pretend that whatever the young kid did warranted an arrest (which is unclear at this point). Then he definitely resisted and therefore tackling him and giving him a couple of whacks on the back to get him to cooperate is ok with me. However, once he was face down... regardless if he was squiggling or not, the threat to the police was gone. All that was left was for the officers to pull him arm around to his back and then cuff him. All of the blows they threw once he was flat on his stomach were uncalled for... the canine situation was WAY OVER THE TOP.

    They had him subdued and then had to let him go so the K-9 unit could chew his neck and face so they could subdue him again.

    IDK, I didn't see him resisting anything. The cops come into the video and immediately charge at him and tackle him. Then proceed to give him the beat down. If it is true that he couldn't get to his car, where was he supposed to go? What did they expect him to do? If that's what he was upset about, audio would be helpful.

    I am going with this ^^. The boy was looking for trouble and he found it. He was clearly being disorderly and causing a scene. He also clearly resisted and at one time had his arms around the officer gun belt area.....very stupid move. I am not putting up with some idiot walking down a public street acting stupid where I work and no one else should either. As for the K9? I don't know on that one.

    Cop right? I do believe this was made for you

     

    drillsgt

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    108   0   0
    Nov 29, 2009
    9,657
    149
    Sioux Falls, SD
    While I'd need to watch the video more closely to see which officer was doing what, that K9 officer was way over the top. I've never seen a K9 used in that manner. I've never seen officers on the ground with a suspect stop fighting and get up to let the K9 into it. While I cannot speak for ACPD policies, ours would NEVER allow a K9 officer to do this. That K9 officer's actions could easily push him outside the realm of qualified immunity and the target of Federal civil rights litigation. The others might as well...maybe, but that K9 officer should be bought and paid for.

    +1 There's a reason you don't see IMPD in stories like this.
     

    lucky4034

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Jan 14, 2012
    3,789
    48
    IDK, I didn't see him resisting anything. The cops come into the video and immediately charge at him and tackle him. Then proceed to give him the beat down. If it is true that he couldn't get to his car, where was he supposed to go? What did they expect him to do? If that's what he was upset about, audio would be helpful.

    I am not siding with the cops at all... NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENED it went way too far and hopefully the gross offenders lose their badge... especially the K9 guy.

    Its also impossible to know why they ended up chasing him down or why he kept turning around and yelling at the cops. More than likely the cops weren't silent the entire time and shout and heckled him while he left. He may have started the insults, but I highly doubt they didn't provoke him as he walked away. IF THEY heckled him... then at the very least that was unbecoming and they should show better restraint.

    In my post above, I purposely give the cops all benefit of the doubt in this situation and STILL find them guilty of excessive force. The reason I give them all benefit of doubt is because every cop on this forum will do the same and its a mute argument until the audio is released (if there is audio).

    What I really think happened is that the kid was pissed about not having access to his car and the cops told him to kick rocks which prompted him to get in a heated exchange of words. The kid did the right thing by walking away, but more than likely the cops heckled him and when he took the bait and crossed the line, they had reason to run him down and arrest him. Once they grabbed him... HE DID resist. You can see him grabbing one cop by the waste which I would agree is a big no no and gives them reason to slap him around until he submitted.

    The bad part was once they had him face down his leg was caught underneath him and he couldn't flatten out which inspired the cops to further beat him (when in fact he had long submitted). In the video, you actually see one of the cops grab his foot and flatten him out and all that was left was to cuff him..... Thats when the pissed off dog came....
     
    Top Bottom