Who is crooked?
I'd like to debate with you specifically why you have denied repeatedly that there was any form of indemnity for the manufacturer of the Urabe containing vaccine Pluserix when it was originally introduced; why you have denied that.
And I have here Dr Salisbury are the unredacted minutes of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation held on 7 May 1993 and here in these minutes it says "once SKB" that is SmithKline Beecham "continued to sell the Urabe strain vaccine without liability". How Dr Salisbury do you explain the term "without liability" in that context. It seems to me that this was something that was disclosed to me by your whistleblower from the government, from your own committee, who said the deal was done with the manufacturer to exempt them from liability for introducing the vaccine that they had concerns about because they were already having problems with it in Canada where it was then withdrawn.
At that time the single measles vaccine, the single vaccines were available freely on the National Health Service. Otherwise, I would not have suggested that option. So parents, if they were legitimately concerned about the safety of MMR could go and get the single vaccines. Six months later the British government unilaterally withdrew the importation licence for the single vaccines therefore depriving parents of having these on the NHS; depriving parents who had legitimate concerns about the safety of MMR from a choice; denying them the opportunity to protect their children in the way that they saw fit.
Ah yes, Andrew Wakefield...the former physician who serves as a cautionary tale in medical ethics texts worldwide.
I'm so tired of hearing about the 'dangers' of vaccines.
Then he should be easy to defeat in a public debate.
How is the winner decided again? Do they measure how loud the audience cheers? Do people text in votes like on American Idol? Do TV personalities decide, like with candidates for President?
The way I see it, natural selection is going to decide this one and I know which side I'll choose.
I'm so tired of being inundated with solicitations to do drugs, rarely if ever mentioning the 'dangers.'I'm so tired of hearing about the 'dangers' of vaccines.
Viewers can hear both sides and make their own decisions.
How will that result in a clear winner? If you mean individuals each decide their own 'winner', they can already do that by choosing to be vaccinated or not.
faith vs. science, once again.
Agreed.
I just don't think the government is worthy of my faith. That's why I prefer science.
Who is crooked?
You've done nothing but try to discredit scientific studies and at the same time put your faith in discredited scientist.
And quit throwing up the government as a strawman. Your opposition is the vast majority of physicians, epidemiologist and medical community at large.
Your opposition is the vast majority of physicians, epidemiologist and medical community at large.