Acting Attorney General has been fired by the President

[CavMedic]

Well, you got him there, that's one. Now you've got 10,000 to go.... get busy.

Lets add Oklahoma City then, that will cut into it, but since the body count isn't the same we should be okay with it. Arguments like this are f'ing stupid. Well they haven't killed that many people so why should it be an issue...that argument then applies to refugees. As a whole they have done anything bad in the grand scheme. So what a Syrian raped and killed a German woman. Doesn't they are all bad cause like they have 7,600 rapes a year so only 7,599 to go til it should matter...

 

[T.Lex]

There is no muslim ban. Repeating your LIE over and over won't ever make it true.

But, "Religious Test Extreme Vetting While Incarcerated" is a real mouthful.

I wonder if Trump counted on this kind of divisiveness. I mean, if it were a politician, methinks INGO would be labeling certain things smokescreens..

 

[two70]

....Sometimes when we look into things for ourselves we get more info beyond the sensationalism that MSM dolls out.

Highly ironic considering your previous posts trumpeting the crap the very same MSM put out about Trump's EO.

 

[Kutnupe14]

There is no muslim ban. Repeating your LIE over and over won't ever make it true.

It's a Muslim ban.... yep, still convinced it's true. But people are able to believe however they want it that type of discrimination helps you sleep. Lol, what am I saying??? I'm sure as soon as the ban was passed, people slept like babies, enjoying "visions of Muslims excluded dancing in their heads."

 

[Kutnupe14]

Highly ironic considering your previous posts trumpeting the crap the very same MSM put out about Trump's EO.

Right! Breitbart is your "go to." Completely honest media.... well, for the Alt-Right crowd.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

But, "Religious Test Extreme Vetting While Incarcerated" is a real mouthful.

I wonder if Trump counted on this kind of divisiveness. I mean, if it were a politician, methinks INGO would be labeling certain things smokescreens..

I'm pretty sure he noticed the "activities" before his election, post election, pre-inauguration, and now...divisiveness was there way before this EO. They promised 100 days of protests and they're doing it, regardless of what he does and they've still got like 80-85 days left to go.

 

[bwframe]

 

[printcraft]

Lets add Oklahoma City then, that will cut into it, but since the body count isn't the same we should be okay with it. Arguments like this are f'ing stupid. Well they haven't killed that many people so why should it be an issue...that argument then applies to refugees. As a whole they have done anything bad in the grand scheme. So what a Syrian raped and killed a German woman. Doesn't they are all bad cause like they have 7,600 rapes a year so only 7,599 to go til it should matter...

Mistakes were made......... hindsight and all of that.

?Mistakes? during refugee influx, says Germany?s Schäuble | News | DW.COM | 29.01.2017

 

[ArcadiaGP]

There is no muslim ban. Repeating your LIE over and over won't ever make it true.

We're all aware that, in essence, this 90-day delay doesn't amount to an outright Muslim ban. At it's word, it is not a Muslim ban.

However, using some critical thinking here, how do you jive the Guiliani statement about Trump asking for a legal way to make it a Muslim ban? So that it's intended result is such, or as close as possible to such?

I don't know where I stand on it 100%. I can see it both ways... Guiliani could lie, but Trump could lie. How do you see it?

 

[Kutnupe14]

We're all aware that, in essence, this 90-day delay doesn't amount to an outright Muslim ban. At it's word, it is not a Muslim ban.

However, using some critical thinking here, how do you jive the Guiliani statement about Trump asking for a legal way to make it a Muslim ban? So that it's intended result is such, or as close as possible to such?

I don't know where I stand on it 100%. I can see it both ways... Guiliani could lie, but Trump could lie. How do you see it?

Ding! People like to avoid that particular nugget.

 

[gregr]

It's a Muslim ban.... yep, still convinced it's true. But people are able to believe however they want it that type of discrimination helps you sleep. Lol, what am I saying??? I'm sure as soon as the ban was passed, people slept like babies, enjoying "visions of Muslims excluded dancing in their heads."

Please answer: who flew planes into the World Trade centers? Who were the rapists in Germany? Who are the assassins beheading those they may in the Middle East? Whom then should we restrict in order to protect American citizens? Our Constitution protects American citizens and is not applicable to the rest of the world.

 

[Woobie]

It's a Muslim ban.... yep, still convinced it's true. But people are able to believe however they want it that type of discrimination helps you sleep. Lol, what am I saying??? I'm sure as soon as the ban was passed, people slept like babies, enjoying "visions of Muslims excluded dancing in their heads."

Then you are easily convinced by simplistic devices like a meme.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Please answer: who flew planes into the World Trade centers? Who were the rapists in Germany? Who are the assassins beheading those they may in the Middle East? Whom then should we restrict in order to protect American citizens? Our Constitution protects American citizens and is not applicable to the rest of the world.

Terrorists and criminals?
But wait, I don't think that's the answer you're looking for. I think you're looking for a one word answer.
Is it same people who are far and away most often the victims, helped US soldiers during the Gulf wars, and have funny curved swords?

 

[Kutnupe14]

Then you are easily convinced by simplistic devices like a meme.

...or a presidential executive order

 

[Woobie]

Ding! People like to avoid that particular nugget.

Because it says nothing about the actual effect. It is a motivation according to someone who is sore. I avoid a lot of side bar issues. Talk to me about effects, or heck, even causes. Quit boring me with arguments about purported motivations that aren't reflected in the EO.

 

[Woobie]

...or a presidential executive order

Cool. So show me the ban on Muslims in the order.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Cool. So show me the ban on Muslims in the order.

Didn't the president call it a "ban?"

 

[Woobie]

Didn't the president call it a "ban?"

Strike one.

Show me in the EO. Trump can call it the oompa-loompa genocide order 66, it doesn't change the wording of the document.

 

[two70]

Are we importing the German refugees here or something?

How the hell would we know? The refugees come from countries where record keeping is poor, and proper vetting is very difficult if not impossible. You know..... kind of the point of the EO.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Strike one.

Show me in the EO. Trump can call it the oompa-loompa genocide order 66, it doesn't change the wording of the document.

Goes to motive. If you don't want to acknowledge that, even with Rudy confirming it, and Trump proposing it previously, fine. The Nazis had "resettlement" documents too. I just it goes to how much one trusts their govt.... and I don't know about you, but it hasn't inspired much for the past few presidents. And if one chooses to trust the word of Trump, unflinchingly, despite (insert scam), well there's probably not a whole lot that will convince one otherwise.