I listen to them sometimes. It's funny, because they will bring up a particular story and make an issue out of something. Then I get on INGO, and lol and behold, this one particular member is all worked up about the same non-issue that NPR is.
This is beyond absurd. How anyone can take them serious anymore baffles me
I listen to them sometimes. It's funny, because they will bring up a particular story and make an issue out of something. Then I get on INGO, and lol and behold, this one particular member is all worked up about the same non-issue that NPR is.
But he's just making sure INGO doesn't miss anything and is, you know, exposed to many viewpoints
WHAT! I've never heard of this before! Nor has it been discussed on INGO.
It's a nothing issue regardless of who's in office.
This is beyond absurd. How anyone can take them serious anymore baffles me
Which them are we talking about?
Maybe I'm out of it today, but I'm not sure who you're referring to...
Oh wait, now I know.
Happy I could be of service!
If you're implying that it's been discussed in one of those giant mess threads on INGO, then for you sir I say...
It's been a few months so my memory is foggy, but can someone post the thread about how Bill Clinton meeting with Lynch while his wife is being investigated by lynch and running for president was so wrong? My search fu is apparently bad today.
Because we have people wanting kelly Ann "nailed to the wall" for making an offhand comment about trump's daughters line of clothing line.
i am fed up with the candy asses on the right being afraid to punch liberals in the face, so to speak. They threw Trent Lott overboard for a comment about a guy's 100th birthday party. and Newt Gingrich being tossed aside. Puh-Thetic. Stand up for yourself
Now we're defending Strom Thurmond and his views? lol. Is that what the right is, Strom Thurmond supporters? Good luck with that argument. Thurmond, a hypocrite, a racist, and generally, a person who (if he didn't repent) is probably having dinner with the devil.
It's been a few months so my memory is foggy, but can someone post the thread about how Bill Clinton meeting with Lynch while his wife is being investigated by lynch and running for president was so wrong? My search fu is apparently bad today.
Because we have people wanting kelly Ann "nailed to the wall" for making an offhand comment about trump's daughters line of clothing line.
i am fed up with the candy asses on the right being afraid to punch liberals in the face, so to speak. They threw Trent Lott overboard for a comment about a guy's 100th birthday party. and Newt Gingrich being tossed aside. Puh-Thetic. Stand up for yourself
Now we're defending Strom Thurmond and his views? lol. Is that what the right is, Strom Thurmond supporters? Good luck with that argument. Thurmond, a hypocrite, a racist, and generally, a person who (if he didn't repent) is probably having dinner with the devil.
Yeah. Kut seems to be good at stretching and bending someones point in a direction that was never intended to fit another issue that he wants to rail on.Wow. That's a pretty long stretch to get there. But you did it.
You are (purposefully?) mistaken. We aren't defending Thurmond. But Lott got run out of dodge for wishing a long-serving US Senator happy birthday. That was silly
Wow. That's a pretty long stretch to get there. But you did it.
Do you remember what exactly what Lott said? I'm unsure if it was Thurmond's birthday or not, but I can still remember being incensed at what he said.
It might be a stretch, but using the Lott/Thurmond dynamic to call conservatives weak, should be pretty offensive to conservatives that knew the type of trash Thurmond was, and how stupid Lott was to even make the statement that he did. Those two are the hill conservatives want to die on.
"I want to say this about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either," Lott said at last week's party.
Now Lott meant something entirely different by that statement, and everyone knew it. And, yes, it was at Thurmond's 100th birthday. But it was seized upon by some and the narrative was pushed that Lott was endorsing one of the positions Thurmond took during the 1948 election. The spin was on, which was in truth an effort to sink the new Senate Majority Leader. It worked, because no one had the guts to contradict the spin machine once the issue had gone up in flames.
Do you remember what exactly what Lott said? I'm unsure if it was Thurmond's birthday or not, but I can still remember being incensed at what he said.
Assuming it difference from what I'm thinking, what did Lott mean? Lott needed his career sunk, if he believed what he actually said on Thurmond's birthday.
December 5, 2002 - At a function honoring outgoing Senator Strom Thurmond, says in regards to his state of Mississippi voting for Thurmond in the 1948 presidential election - "We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years either."
I don't think that is quite the innocent birthday wish some would like to think it is