Approximately 20 killed in nightclub shooting

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,726
    113
    Indianapolis
    Update in Noor Salman trial: The defense is calling for a mistrial after just learning Omar Mateen’s father was an FBI informant

    DZNZXMeX4AEr5K4.jpg:large
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    What?

    The federales withheld Brady evidence?

    I actually am kinda surprised. I have VERY limited experience in this - and the experience I do have is stale - but that's a mistake they are pretty good at avoiding.

    However, there's probably more to it than this. Defense counsel love to overstate "withheld" evidence for a claim like this.

    I'm also totally curious as to why defense counsel are quoting Screwtape Letters in a brief. I wonder if the judge is Catholic, and they know that.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,063
    113
    Uranus

    That headline sucks. "widow" is typically reserved for a victims spouse.

    Also:

    Attorney Charles Swift said there was no way Salman knew that Mateen would attack the Pulse nightclub because even he didn't know he would attack the nightclub until after he went to the Disney Springs complex.

    WTF. She KNEW about the Disney attack but he didn't do that one so she walks on the nightclub attack. WTF.
     

    Fargo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Mar 11, 2009
    7,575
    63
    In a state of acute Pork-i-docis
    What?

    The federales withheld Brady evidence?

    I actually am kinda surprised. I have VERY limited experience in this - and the experience I do have is stale - but that's a mistake they are pretty good at avoiding.

    However, there's probably more to it than this. Defense counsel love to overstate "withheld" evidence for a claim like this.

    I'm also totally curious as to why defense counsel are quoting Screwtape Letters in a brief. I wonder if the judge is Catholic, and they know that.

    C.S. Lewis was an Anglican if memory serves.

    If the reporting is accurate, I am unsurprised at the not guilty verdict. It sounds like the government’s theory is that inaction now constitutes a crime, when the law almost always requires you to actually DO something.

    Between this and the Bundy fiasco, I wonder if they will start rethinking these stretchy targeted prosecutions.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Oh yeah. I always think of Lewis as a Catholic apologist, but he was really a Christian apologist.
     

    Alamo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Oct 4, 2010
    8,372
    113
    Texas
    But she would still be eligible for civil suit by the living victims and the deceased victims' families , à la OJ, n'est-ce pas? I'm guessing findable assets are few tho.
     

    Fargo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Mar 11, 2009
    7,575
    63
    In a state of acute Pork-i-docis
    But she would still be eligible for civil suit by the living victims and the deceased victims' families , à la OJ, n'est-ce pas? I'm guessing findable assets are few tho.
    I don't know of a civil cause of action that would cover "failure to report a planned future crime" outside of where there is a special obligation like a parent or teacher, but then again I don't really do civil law.

    OJ was found liable because they found it more likely than not that he killed her himself.
     

    Sylvain

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 30, 2010
    77,313
    113
    Normandy
    Context. Widow IMHO gives an air of "sympathy" which in this case I don't believe is due. She was in on it, she is not a victim, she is a co conspirator.
    The victims in this case were all in the night club.

    I don't think it implies any sympathy.
    I don't see what they are supposed to call her besides "widow".
    "Wife of the deceased terrorist"?
     
    Top Bottom