Why can a person own a dog, and not a deer?
The state is the only entity who can own a deer? Some standard you have there.
That deer probably had incriminating information on someone and had to be silenced.
Was the fawn resisting?
These types of raids are becoming SOP, and are no longer a rarity. The show of overwhelming firepower and para-military dress has no place in everyday law enforcement. When do people finally wake up and say enough?
In the state of Wisconsin, the only entity that can own a deer is the state. It is the standard of property rights.
It is an perversion of property rights. No property rights are recognized except for the government's illegitimate claims. Everyone else's property rights have been abolished.
It is an perversion of property rights. No property rights are recognized except for the government's illegitimate claims. Everyone else's property rights have been abolished.
Besides, why should the state have rights over an animal residing in the state over the landowner on whose property the animal resides, eats, damages fences, and damages automobiles while crossing the road in proscribed areas?
A philosophical question best answered at the legislature.
Some states hold that landowners own the animals, most states do not.
but it defies my understanding that any reasonable argument can be made for the notion of claiming ownership while disowning responsibility aside from 'we're the government and we can do whatever we want'.
Seriously Freeman, WHO is in danger of being ruled here? There is no monarch in the situation. Owning property and animals is not tyranny or whatever you believe. Its Individual Rights 101.The only perversion here is the Rule of Man.
Seriously Freeman, WHO is in danger of being ruled here?