Anyone For Mitt In 2016

[longbarrel]

Mitt passed a assualt weapons ban. Anyone on this forum that did or will vote for him is insane and should leave this forum permenatly. This is a PRO gun forum. Mitt also implemented obama care prior to obama with romeny care which is what obama care is based off of. He is SCUM.

Finally, someone with good sense.

 

[longbarrel]

Nobody but Hillary.

I hope you mean "anybody"

 

[Jomibe]

Hillary or Elizabeth thank you for your decision.

Voting for the limp **** faction of the republican party is a vote for "Hillary" too.

 

[ATM]

4 pages so far and still waiting on the INGOtarians to name an electable candidate....

What part of being ruled by 2 parties do you not grasp? There are no "electable candidates" at this level of the game, it's simply not allowed.

You either support what they give you or you don't.

 

[Destro]

What part of being ruled by 2 parties do you not grasp? There are no "electable candidates" at this level of the game, it's simply not allowed.

You either support what they give you or you don't.

so more bla bla bla, and no name?

 

[ruger1800]

Considering the currant bureaucratic fiasco,a transgender candidate married to a dog would do well.

 

[ATM]

so more bla bla bla, and no name?

I'm not evading your request, I'm mocking it. There is no name, no individual, who can overcome the parties currently ruling us.

They have more than enough consent to continue.

 

[sidewinder27]

So no one here wants to seriously consider Rand Paul? He's a strong supporter of both the Constitution and the Second Amendment and has connected well with a broader portion of the electorate, not just the typical Republican base.

I'd just like to add that if Hillary doesn't run, the next election is either partys' to lose although I think the republicans have much better candidate options than the Democrats right now. They're pretty much dead set on Hillary.

If Rand runs I'll vote for him, but like his father I don't think the establishment will allow him to get there.

 

[sidewinder27]

Isn't there a law against that?

Wouldn't surprise me.

 

[Redhorse]

If Rand runs I'll vote for him, but like his father I don't think the establishment will allow him to get there.

I surly hope they do. He can win.

 

[bwframe]

4 pages so far and still waiting on the INGOtarians to name an electable candidate....

But that would take away from their childish game of blaming everyone else. It would cause a reason for accountability, that most of their talking points would not hold up to.

 

[Henry]

4 pages so far and still waiting on the INGOtarians to name an electable candidate....

Do you vote your principle or based on whom you are told is electable?

 

[deal me in]

But that would take away from their childish game of blaming everyone else. It would cause a reason for accountability, that most of their talking points would not hold up to.

As opposed to your talking point: "The people I support really suck, but they are electable".

 

[printcraft]

I hope you mean "anybody"

Nope....... That's my sarcastic response to THE sarcastic response you'll see posted in INGO for ANY person running as a Republican for president.
It does not matter WHO the republican nominee is, they will be looked at as "anybody but hillary" NONE will be sufficiently pure.
A sufficiently PURE candidate DOES NOT EXIST. It's 100% or nothing. We can't slow this train down don'tcha know in the hopes of reversing it.
It's full speed ahead into the ditch and anarchy.

 

[Dead Duck]

Nope....... That's my sarcastic response to THE sarcastic response you'll see posted in INGO for ANY person running as a Republican for president.
It does not matter WHO the republican nominee is, they will be looked at as "anybody but hillary" NONE will be sufficiently pure.
A sufficiently PURE candidate DOES NOT EXIST. It's 100% or nothing. We can't slow this train down don'tcha know in the hopes of reversing it.
It's full speed ahead into the ditch and anarchy.

Genius.....Pure Genius.

 

[bwframe]

As opposed to your talking point: "The people I support really suck, but they are electable".

This is why you folks have so much trouble getting beyond 5-6% of the voting public.

Honestly, I'm your target. I would love to come join you folks, we're together on more than not.
But when you behave like this...

...doubt it.

 

[2A_Tom]

Sure let's just concede.

 

[2A_Tom]

There is no candidate that we would consider a good candidate that will not be destroyed by the mainstream media.

Every great man has something in his past, no matter how small that the MSM will blow so out of proportion that their family may never live it down.

That is why Mitch won't run.

No decent person can win.

The Republican candidate will be Romney (gag), Bush (gag, retch) or Christie (gag, retch, puke).

I'm not sure if I'll be able to hold it in at the poll this time or if I'll just let the Dems have it. None of those will win anyway.

 

[BogWalker]

So because you aren't guaranteed to win you won't even try? Gee, no wonder you have so much difficulty winning elections. Hard to vote for somebody that doesn't run.

 

[deal me in]

This is why you folks have so much trouble getting beyond 5-6% of the voting public.

Honestly, I'm your target. I would love to come join you folks, we're together on more than not.
But when you behave like this...

...doubt it.

I'll keep that in mind when I'm "playing childish games".... Hypocrite.