Armed citizens running out of ammo in real life?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • joe138

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    710
    79
    Lawrence County
    It is my understanding that an off duty police officer ran out of ammunition during an active killer incident a few years ago in Salt Lake City. The story is that he was celebrating Valentines Day with his wife at a mall in down town Salt Lake. The shooter was armed with a pump action shot gun and started shooting on a lower level of the mall than the off duty officer. The officer engaged the shooter from a higher position, did not hit him, but did contain him until on duty officers arrived and finished the fight. The off duty guy was reportedly armed with a 1911 with one magazine and had expended all of his ammunition.
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,072
    113
    NWI
    I don't consider carrying a little extra a bad idea or anything, but we have not (at least not yet) reached the point where encountering hostile mini-mobs of criminals is common, therefore I don't see the need to carry ammunition in a way that brings Pancho Villa to mind.


    The knock out game.
    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...=riNKY2BA38qW5xk74OM4Tw&bvm=bv.95039771,d.b2w

    It is my understanding that an off duty police officer ran out of ammunition during an active killer incident a few years ago in Salt Lake City. The story is that he was celebrating Valentines Day with his wife at a mall in down town Salt Lake. The shooter was armed with a pump action shot gun and started shooting on a lower level of the mall than the off duty officer. The officer engaged the shooter from a higher position, did not hit him, but did contain him until on duty officers arrived and finished the fight. The off duty guy was reportedly armed with a 1911 with one magazine and had expended all of his ammunition.

    Remember this one?

    Why one cop now carries 145 rounds.
    https://www.google.com/url?q=http:/...ds-cse&usg=AFQjCNEeKNwqTO3tIT02NvCvq5YSov0YUw

    I realize this is a police officer, but who is to say that it could not happen to you. I realize you will not be running to the fight but what if the fight comes to you?

    There have also been threads of multiple home invaders.
     

    cosermann

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Aug 15, 2008
    8,392
    113
    As mentioned in the thread, there are good reasons to carry a reload apart from capacity. That said. . .

    Per the incidents in which Tom Given's students have been involved, I think the average is 3-ish rounds (going from memory here, could be off a little).

    However, there are several cases amongst those students where they went to slide lock (say, 12-ish rounds). Not uncommon by any means.

    Something else to factor in is that there's likely to be more than one attacker maybe 50% of the time.

    John Farnam's analysis of SOP-9 comes to the conclusion that 8 rnds is about average [1]. (Yes, I know, not directly applicable).

    There are lots of such anecdotes and data points that could be cited.

    Keep in mind, data from dead people (like, say, people who ran out of boolits first) is harder to come by unless it was caught on video, another good guy was there, etc. So, I would expect examples of people who "lost" because they ran out of ammo first to be fairly rare relative to it's actual occurrence.

    From all my tracking with this through the decades, 8 rounds plus a reload isn't a bad rule of thumb imho. However, I also think the variability is pretty high. If something comes up, you're going to have to deal with it regardless of what you are or are not carrying at the time.

    [1] - John Farnam - Enough Ammunition
     

    Mgderf

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    43   0   0
    May 30, 2009
    18,101
    113
    Lafayette
    The knock out game.
    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...=riNKY2BA38qW5xk74OM4Tw&bvm=bv.95039771,d.b2w



    Remember this one?

    Why one cop now carries 145 rounds.
    https://www.google.com/url?q=http:/...ds-cse&usg=AFQjCNEeKNwqTO3tIT02NvCvq5YSov0YUw

    I realize this is a police officer, but who is to say that it could not happen to you. I realize you will not be running to the fight but what if the fight comes to you?

    There have also been threads of multiple home invaders.


    Quantity has a quality all it's own.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,928
    113
    Hi guys,

    I am always impressed by the depth of knowledge and experience of guys on this forum, so I thought I would pose a question. Has anyone heard of ANY situation where an armed citizen (NOT a police officer) lost the fight because they ran out of ammo?

    If you do not know of that type of situation, have you heard of one where an armed citizen had to go to hands/knives to survive an attack BECAUSE they ran out of ammo? What about an armed citizen having to reload and continue firing after running out of ammo? What about an armed citizen having to resort to a backup gun because they ran out of ammo?

    I am not trying to prove any point this question (such as all you need is a 5 shot snubby). Rather, I constantly hear about capacity, reload, and backup issues within the gun community, but haven't actually heard of a person needing it to fight off a human attacker. I have heard of someone needing to shoot and reload twice to stop a mountain lion with a revolver, but that is it.

    I am assuming that this had to have happened at least once, I just have never heard about it. What have you guys heard?

    I've been involved in the investigation of hundreds of shootings and I've yet to see it. I've seen people lose with guns still in the holster, guns they were reaching for, guns that malfunctioned, guns they didn't get the safety off, and guns that worked just fine but they caught a bullet themselves before they emptied it. I've yet to see someone lose with an empty gun in their hand that wasn't empty before they started. (Robbers don't always have access to ammo...)

    I have seen one recent case where the bad guy's gun caught a bullet at the bottom of the grip, knocking the magazine's floor plate off and dumping his rounds. A spare mag would have been useful, but probably wouldn't have mattered to him as he kept getting hammered and was pulling his own trigger not realizing why it wasn't working.

    The vast, vast majority of gun fights are resolved one way or the other before any party has time to empty the mag.

    That said, its cheap insurance to carry a spare magazine. What's the down side?
     

    Dosproduction

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Aug 25, 2013
    1,696
    48
    Porter County
    I heard of a story of a women with children who ran to her crawlspace or something when a man broke into her home. She unloaded a revolver in him and the guy still managed to drive off. It was back around the time of the last high capacity magazine scare. If there had been a second guy she could have lost
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    93,401
    113
    Merrillville

    Bucknut

    Plinker
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    32   0   0
    Aug 28, 2008
    112
    18
    Fishers
    Moosecock.jpg

    It's not always about ammo capacity. The above patch was "earned" at a carbine class, but the logic still applies to EDC. Without the magazine your weapon won't function and there are numerous ways that the magazine can separate from your weapon and end up on the deck. This leaves you with at best a single shot weapon unless you have a spare magazine within hands reach.

    BTW you can google "Pat Rogers moosecock" for an explanation of the patch (NSFW).
     

    gjclark

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 2, 2014
    120
    18
    Fort Wayne
    If the average is set at 5-6, and some are over in 1-2, then mathematically some are over in +6.

    My guess is this isn't how they meant that. They didn't take the average but instead looked that the percentage that fell under 5-6 shots. If 90% of gun-fights finish in 3 shots and 5% in 6 shots and 5% take more than 6 than they can still say "Most are ended in less than 6 shots." They didn't say the average fight was 6 shots.

    Just my engineer thought for the day.
     
    Top Bottom