Remember when these came out there wasn't a lot of competition, the Rugers which weren't a target gun, some Colt Woodsman's and probably High Standards. New guns may very well shoot as well as the old 41's now!
Not really a lot of competition today either - the Ruger MK Series , Buckmarks or Smith Victory are not bullseye competition ready out of the box.
Most range shooters/plinkers/hunters looking for a Browning or Ruger probably don't consider spending many hundreds more for a 41. Top level bullseye shooters using guns like the Pardini or Hammerli are not in the market for a 41 either.
As my high master bullseye friend told me some years ago the 41 is a more ergonomic pistol for a lot of shooters , part of it might have to do with the grip angle being similar to the 1911 which is used in the centerfire stages. But the 41 is not something that will immediately transform a marksman shooter into a master over night.
In out of the box comparison between my 41 and MKII I'll shoot the 41 much better in a true one handed target match. Now with really good trigger work the MKII can perform well. Out of the box the MKII trigger was not very good for target matches. Clark Custom really performed one of the best trigger jobs I have ever experienced with my MKII back in 1994.