California Cops Beat Mentally Ill Man To Death

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    18,960
    113
    Arcadia
    I'm going to go out on a limb and speculate that the jurors had more information on what actually transpired than the entirety of INGO combined yet it's a miscarriage of justice? Why so? Because the accused did not get convicted? If it were anyone other than cops in this trial would the sentiment be the same? I thought INGO seemed to have more faith in the power of the jury and an expectation that if the State's burden of proof was not met, the accused should go free.
     

    mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    KTLA coverage of it.
    Ex-Officers Found Not Guilty in Kelly Thomas? Beating Death | KTLA 5

    As for philo...We all saw the and heard the videos. We saw the aftermath of their beating of him. The same beating that killed him. I have some faith in juries, but not a great deal. I've seen them let too many bad guys walk. Some of them wore badges, many didn't. And yes, if these had not been cops in this case, I would have said the same thing if they'd have walked. A travesty of justice.
     

    phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    18,960
    113
    Arcadia
    I was just asking. If I knew the specifics of the case I've long since forgotten and I have just as much distrust for juries but I'll admit to being jaded in that regard.
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    "What this means is that all of us need to be very afraid now," said Ron Thomas, a retired sheriff's deputy and father of the deceased. "Its carte blanche for police officers everywhere to kill us, beat us, whatever they want. It has been proven right here today that they'll get away with it."

    "I guess its legal to go out and kill," said the victim's mother, Cathy Thomas.
     

    saberstar

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    17   0   0
    Apr 19, 2012
    314
    18
    Bloomington, IN
    I read all of the posts and I reviewed the video. This from all the information I have seen this is an injustice. I can only pray that justice is served in some way for the victim.
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    Fullerton Police Officer Stephen Rubio testified in court on the behalf of the defense. He said that he had trained Cicinelli and Ramos, and that he watched the 33-minute surveillance video of Kelly Thomas’s death. He testified that the only “slight” violation of department policy that he witnessed was the use of profanity.

    “These peace officers were doing their jobs," said the defense attorney representing the police. "They were operating as they were trained.”


    Uniformed killers walk free after beating and tasing unarmed homeless man to death | Police State USA

    KellyThomas5.jpg
     

    ghuns

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    9,365
    113
    If it were anyone other than cops in this trial would the sentiment be the same?

    Can you imagine a scenario where anyone else, and their 5 non-police buddies could hold a man down and beat him to death where they would not ALL go to jail for a long, long time? I can't.:dunno:

    I agree that we cannot know everything the jury knows, but damn. The pics and video should have made it a slam dunk.
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,458
    149
    Napganistan
    Can you imagine a scenario where anyone else, and their 5 non-police buddies could hold a man down and beat him to death where they would not ALL go to jail for a long, long time? I can't.:dunno:

    I agree that we cannot know everything the jury knows, but damn. The pics and video should have made it a slam dunk.
    One would think, but it didn't. I wonder what they know that we do not? Juries are a strange animal that is unpredictable and sometimes beyond reason. Never the less it is the best system of justice there is, even with all its faults.
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    I'm going to go out on a limb and speculate that the jurors had more information on what actually transpired than the entirety of INGO combined....

    I agree that we cannot know everything the jury knows, but damn. The pics and video should have made it a slam dunk.

    I wonder what they know that we do not?

    FBI special agent John A. Wilson studied the case for 60 hours and provided his expert testimony. He trains agents on the use of force. He was privy to the case details. He said that the cops picked a fight, their force was excessive, and that the victim had a right to defend himself.

    When he suggested that Kelly Thomas could have fought back, the crowd full of cops hissed with disapproval.

    The Orange County Register:
    Among other things, Wilson testified that Cicinelli's use of his Taser as an impact weapon on Thomas' head “would not be good, proper police procedure” and could be considered deadly force “in excess of what a reasonable officer … would do to gain control of the situation.”

    Los Angeles Times:
    pixel.gif
    Wilson said officers should have stopped hitting Thomas after he started complaining that he couldn't breathe and a pool of blood started forming on the concrete. He also noted that officers should've considered letting Thomas go because he was not an immediate threat early in the encounter.

    John Barnett, Ramos' attorney, asked if Thomas would have posed a greater threat if he had taken a swing at Ramos when they were on the ground. "At this point Mr. Thomas is defending himself, not resisting," Wilson said. "If excessive force was used … he has the right to defend himself."

    OC Weekly:
    [Wilson]said that officer Manuel Ramos began the minor encounter unnecessarily by immediately taking out his baton, swinging it in both hands and poking it at the victim, who hadn't been physically threatening.

    But, according to Wilson, the most unprofessional moment prior to the killing occurred when Ramos mocked the schizophrenia-addled Thomas as stupid, dramatically put on gloves as he towered over him and said, "Now, you see my fists? They're getting ready to **** you up."

    District Attorney Tony Rackauckas played related portions of a surveillance tape of the brutality and, over Ramos defense lawyer John Barnett's incessant objections, asked Wilson if he considered the cop conduct appropriate under the circumstances.

    "Clearly, no," replied the 26-year FBI veteran, who at one point served on the U.S. Attorney General's protection detail in Washington, D.C. "I have problems with everything that happened after Ramos put the gloves on."
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,458
    149
    Napganistan
    FBI special agent John A. Wilson studied the case for 60 hours and provided his expert testimony. He trains agents on the use of force. He was privy to the case details. He said that the cops picked a fight, their force was excessive, and that the victim had a right to defend himself.

    When he suggested that Kelly Thomas could have fought back, the crowd full of cops hissed with disapproval.
    I still wonder what their reasoning was for their verdict. SOMETHING swayed them.
     

    lucky4034

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Jan 14, 2012
    3,789
    48
    I still wonder what their reasoning was for their verdict. SOMETHING swayed them.

    Probably the societal misconception that its acceptable, and by now common place, for cops to beat the **** out of people under the name of duty and in the best interest of public safety.
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    So why did the jury acquit? The same reason they vote for the people they do. The same reason they'll sign petitions to create martial law. They barely have 2 brain cells to rub together. And when they do, they use them to worship their government gods.

    They love the taste of boot polish.

    Californians Sign Petition to Allow Soldiers to Commandeer Anyone's Home & Live There For Free (VIDEO)

    Obama Supporters Sign Petition to Repeal the BILL OF RIGHTS to Support the President (VIDEO)

    People Petition to Confiscate Guns From Tea Party Supporters and Repeal the Second Amendment (VIDEO)
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    If it were anyone other than cops in this trial would the sentiment be the same?

    Aside from a few blogs and local newspapers, the silence is DEAFENING regarding this case.

    So YES... if it were anybody but cops, the sentiment might be different. They might actually hear about it. And they might actually care.

    Compare the coverage of this to months of 24/7 coverage of Martin vs. Zimmerman. That was nationally insignificant, politically irrelevant, and the death was not sanctioned by the state... and yet we couldn't get away from it for over a year. When a gang of tax-subsidized killers gets away with murder, 99% of the country never hears a peep about it. And a lot of the ones who do hear about it shrug it off as just a dirty bum who had it coming. USA!! USA!! USA!!
     

    steveh_131

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    10,046
    83
    Porter County
    I admire his father's restraint. I can't imagine watching a video of my son being beat to death while he calls for me. I can't imagine what my reaction would be.

    I fully expected a guilty verdict on this one. Maybe I have too much faith in humanity, but this entire episode is recorded on video and there were witnesses all around. Despite my usual cynicism on these matters, I am truly shocked.
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    526,326
    Messages
    9,839,189
    Members
    54,028
    Latest member
    scottrodgers87
    Top Bottom