The House has tried 40 times now to repeal the ACA.... and failed 40 times... remind me what the definition of insanity is again?
Not only that, it was uphold by SCOTUS. Congress needs to stop wasting time and money on repeal. They should try when the people realize how bogus some parts of the law are.
This isn't repeal, it's playing the funding game. Without a budget, the continuing resolutions are the mechanism or game they are using to fund the activities of the .gov. I don't see why it's a waste of time to use this tool to try in preventing this abomination from taking even further root into our economy. Whatever money they waste in successfully stopping obamacare will be worth it in the long run.
Secondly, just because the SCOTUS upheld this thing, doesn't mean they're right...they're just the final arbiters. This is just one of the latest anti-constitutional decisions they've made.
This isn't repeal, it's playing the funding game. Without a budget, the continuing resolutions are the mechanism or game they are using to fund the activities of the .gov. I don't see why it's a waste of time to use this tool to try in preventing this abomination from taking even further root into our economy. Whatever money they waste in successfully stopping obamacare will be worth it in the long run.
Secondly, just because the SCOTUS upheld this thing, doesn't mean they're right...they're just the final arbiters. This is just one of the latest anti-constitutional decisions they've made.
If they can't repeal it after dozens of times, what makes anyone think they can successfully defund it? If it'll cease to be, it will. Once enough voters call for a change, it will happen. I do not support the repeal of the entire bill, but a good part of it needs to be changed/repealed.
I'm OK with the repeal of all 2400 pages and the reversal of all the regulations geometrically spawned by their enactment.
Which parts do you believe ought to stay in effect?
I'm OK with the repeal of all 2400 pages and the reversal of all the regulations geometrically spawned by their enactment.
Which parts do you believe ought to stay in effect?
Good question. I didn't know there were any good parts to it, but like Pelosi, I didn't read it either
I'm OK with the repeal of all 2400 pages and the reversal of all the regulations geometrically spawned by their enactment.
Which parts do you believe ought to stay in effect?
The ability for people under 26 to stay on parents' health insurance, the inability for companies to deny based on pre-existing conditions. I would have been much more happier with a public option though.