Gun Owners = Child Molesters?

[Roadie]

From the comments on:
Smith & Wesson Firearms Slides - Business Insider

There isn't a lot of difference between a child molester and a gun owner. Both have obsessions that will never allow them any piece of mind. They are both carnal minded. In fits of anger, the gun owner will routinely take out his frustrations on anyone who gets in his way. The child molester can only achieve his sick form of happiness by attacking the innocents. And in both cases, when their obsessions become uncontrollable, they go to jail. Child molesters are highly regulated. How come gun owners are not? Both present a clear and present danger to society.

Is this a new tactic from the antis? I have seen this same theme used lately a couple time in comments on other articles as well, and on FB.
Coincidence? Or new way to sway the masses by associating us with something so heinous?

(sadly, the Comments section is close BTW)

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Don't waste your time expecting anything of value to be found in comments sections of websites. They're good for entertainment or if you feel your blood pressure is a little low. But too much of the time, the scum of the earth use those to show just how scummy they can be.

 

[223 Gunner]

I guess as a community we are feeling the fall out of Will Hayden's accusations. It never ceases to amaze me as to what the left will do next.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Do we really need to worry about simpletons who type "piece of mind"?

They are fools. Laugh at them.

 

[SteveM4A1]

Gun Owners = Child Molesters? Well duh.

Oh wait, this is reality and not some anti's wet dream.

 

[1911ly]

When you can't spread facts, Spew lies. Normal liberal media tactics. Makes you want to

 

[Mark 1911]

The mental gymnastics required to draw a comparison between a gun owner and a child molester would suggest some strong OCD tendencies as well.

 

[femurphy77]

So who do they think has more peace of mind; the informed firearms enthusiast who sleeps well at night KNOWING that if he became the target of a home invasion he stands a better chance of surviving. Or the poor sheeple anti-gun do gooder HOPING the police gets there in time when things go bump in the night?

Personally I sleep pretty darned good!

 

[1911ly]

So who do they think has more piece of mind; the informed firearms enthusiast who sleeps well at night KNOWING that if he became the target of a home invasion he stands a better chance of surviving. Or the poor sheeple anti-gun do gooder HOPING the police gets there in time when things go bump in the night?

Personally I sleep pretty darned good!

This right here!!

 

[Roadie]

The mis- and dis- and lack of- information from the antis is just mind boggling. Take the discussions on Kroger reaffirming that they will follow local laws.. if I had a dollar for every time I saw someone post:

"Now that Kroger allows guns, we will never shop there again"

NOW? They have always had the same policy. SO, you shopped there for 20 years without incident, but now that you KNOW their policy, suddenly things have changed?

"I don't want to SEE a gun.."

So, now we know that it's all about their fear of SEEING a gun. They are fine with CC, since they can be ignorant of their surroundings in a false sense of peace.

It's all about spreading fear for groups like the Mad Mommies, not facts, so I guess the "child molester" rhetoric is just the latest in their arsenal.

 

[bradmedic04]

Do we really need to worry about simpletons who type "piece of mind"?

They are fools. Laugh at them.

 

[88GT]

That's a trip in the way back machine.

 

[GLOCKMAN23C]

When you can't spread facts, Spew lies. Normal liberal media tactics. Makes you want to

The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it.

 

[MCgrease08]

When you can't spread facts, Spew lies. Normal liberal media tactics. Makes you want to

Based on the OP it seems this was a comment from a reader. I don't know that you can attribute the gun owner = molester equation to the media.

 

[Bennettjh]

Gun ownership is a protected right. The other is not.

 

[BluePig]

Demonizing the enemy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[88GT]

Gun ownership is a protected right. The other is not.

I wouldn't go there. It leaves open the door to putting the "other" on morally equivalent ground if at some point in the future it does become protected.

 

[jamil]

I wouldn't go there. It leaves open the door to putting the "other" on morally equivalent ground if at some point in the future it does become protected.

That's a good point. We don't have to argue or prove any points by listing dissimilarities. We only need to laugh at them, as Kirk suggests because it's ****ing silly.

 

[Cameramonkey]

Welcome to libtard logic. If you cant argue based on the facts because they simply arent on your side, revert to emotion, hyperbole, and downright lies to further your cause.

 

[Doug]

People who don't own guns are masochists.
The enjoy being helpless and being hurt.
They know that's a sickness so they try to force everyone else to be in the same condition. That makes their sickness seem normal.
Since they are unable to protect themselves, they don't feel guilty for not protecting themselves or their families.