They haven't changed them one bit. Way I see it they pose no immediate threat to us, any missile fired would be shot down long before it got here.
...Do we actually have a system capable of interception and destroying the target.
Actually the threads about our folks traveling with the masses to and from the freaking eclipse was more of a wakeup call than NK.
I'm ready enough for an EMP. It's tough to prepare for the masses of left coast loons and illegals that will migrate this way when they get hit with one though.
I fear this is a pipe dream. It's tough to believe that this hasn't been used yet since this administration has taken over.
They haven't changed them one bit.
They haven't changed them one bit. Way I see it they pose no immediate threat to us, any missile fired would be shot down long before it got here.
Haven't changed my plans, however I did have a refresher with my kin as to what to do if things get hot. There were a few new questions/problems that were brought up, and we decided how to meet these new challenges.
What is it you think we have that can reliably shoot down an ICBM? Links are awesome.
I do not have the same faith in our system. Not the people manning the military just the ones calling the shots.
Do we actually have a system capable of interception and destroying the target.
Yes we do.
Yes we do.Yes we do.
Ground Based Interceptors are realistically the only line of defense against an ICBM fired toward the continental United States; Aegis and THAAD would likely have better chances during the boost phase or at least give multiple 'bites of the apple'.
This is, of course, assuming that the Norks would actually fire an ICBM in anger against the United States and it has enough range to get here and that they actually have a miniaturized fusion weapon for aforementioned ICBM...which IMO are all pretty darn big assumptions.
If I were in Tokyo or Seoul, I'd be a LOT more concerned than anywhere in Indiana, or Chicago, or even the left coast.