"I don't need no warrant, (expletive)" ... Boom, headshot!

[rambone]

A mother called the police on her son to teach him a lesson after a domestic dispute. Police arrived, and the son told the officers they needed a warrant.

That's when one officer drew his gun and put it to Danny Rodriquez's head, and said, "I DON'T NEED NO WARRANT, M**********R!!" This account comes from the officer's partner.

The confrontation ended with the killing of both Danny Rodriquez and his dog.

Officer Richard Chrisman is being charged with "Aggravated Assault."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qx9Mt4krDtc

He don't need no warrant.
​

 

[sidewinder27]

The officer must of thought he was in Indiana.

Sounds like his partner may be a decent cop considering it sounds like he's breaking that blue line.

 

[IndySSD]

wow... I understand that the official stance of the PD union rep has to be one of " let's see what the investigation and all the facts say " but to I couldn't get past the fatal irony @ 03:00 when he responds to the question about his "I don't need no warrant" comment followed by placing a gun to the deceased's head as the union rep starts spouting about due process and civil liberties.

Some of the best men I know put a badge on every day..... the fact that they have to be associated with the likes of this thug with a badge makes me feel like puking.

Sadly many people don't really know about the 10% rule and will just begin bashing all LEO.

There may be evidence come out that says the suspect acted in self defense because the deceased may have pulled out a weapon after police shot the dog and maybe the officer acted in self defense at that point......

Regardless.... his actions that day are those of a thug and not one of an oathkeeper.

 

[jsharmon7]

Cursing and putting a gun to someone's head before eventually killing them? The fact that the other officer seems to think the situation was pretty bad, and the fact that the officer was charged tells me it can't be good for this guy. This ought to be very interesting as the facts unfold. If it went down the way this clip says it went down, I hope he spends a long time behind bars.

Oh, and how very nice of the reporter to bring on the FOP guy to ambush him. He knew that the FOP guy couldn't say anything more than what he did, but he kept hounding him and cutting him off. Very "O'Reilly-esque" of him.

 

[Wwwildthing]

There is no excuse for a thug like this having a badge, or getting a pass because he does.

NO EXCUSE.

 

[IndySSD]

There is no excuse for a thug like this having a badge, or getting a pass because he does.

NO EXCUSE.

Excuse? No, reason? Yes..

It was explained to my by my Marine friend as "The 10% rule".... I find it VERY much applies to almost everything in life.

10% of the people in the military have no ****ing business being soldiers, they should get out, go home and leave soldiering to the other 90%...

As it pertains to the rest of us....

Basically 10% of the people in any given job have no ****ing business doing that job...



This applies in a very direct and unfortunate manner in situations such as this.

 

[silverspoon]

Interesting that since the "allegations" involved another police officer they are only "allegations". You can bet the farm if the "allegations" were reversed and involved Joe Blow citizen killing the police officer they would be "fact" and Joe Blow citizen would be charged with first degree murder instead of aggravated assault. The FOP representative would be the first in line to be singing for the death penalty.

Not cop bashing but the thin blue line is wearing thin over things such as this. I just wish police officers would hold themselves to the same standards as they hold Joe Blow citizen. I also wish the prosecutors would have the same standards for police officers as they do for Joe Blow citizens. To often it seems both the police and prosecutors are quick to charge Joe Blow with the worst charge on every single count possible but when it involves "one of their own" it's with the mildest charge possible.

Aw well, for what it's worth THANKS to all the 90% out there that care and do their best at a job that your damned if you do and damned if you don't no matter what you do.

 

[rambone]

Aw well, for what it's worth THANKS to all the 90% out there that care and do their best at a job that your damned if you do and damned if you don't no matter what you do.

Also the honest cop, who spoke up about his partner, has my respect. That's what it takes to fix this state of affairs. No wall of silence - no brotherhood coverup. Seek true justice for all.

 

[Dogman]

Any link to the news story?

 

[KG1]

Also the honest cop, who spoke up about his partner, has my respect. That's what it takes to fix this state of affairs. No wall of silence - no brotherhood coverup. Seek true justice for all.

For honest cops.

 

[gunman41mag]

HOORAH, For H O N E S T cops

 

[E5RANGER375]

Excuse? No, reason? Yes..

It was explained to my by my Marine friend as "The 10% rule".... I find it VERY much applies to almost everything in life.

10% of the people in the military have no ****ing business being soldiers, they should get out, go home and leave soldiering to the other 90%...

As it pertains to the rest of us....

Basically 10% of the people in any given job have no ****ing business doing that job...



This applies in a very direct and unfortunate manner in situations such as this.

i agree with your 10% rule. then about 20 more percent of people shouldnt waste our air

the problem that the 10% of bad cops and bad soldiers make, is that when people encounter another person wearing the same uniform they dont know if they are getting one from the 10% or the 90%. thats why I personally do not trust cops right off the bat. I was a witness to a dispute a week or so ago, and I volunteered my account to the responding officers because I didnt want the crazy person to get away (I could have just walked away). but I have to tell you that even me approaching the cops as a witness made me nervous and I have no record at all. Thats pretty sad that its like that. one cop was so green, I thought he was gonna call for a diaper break , I actually had to coach him through what questions to ask me and what info to write down. maybe he hadnt been through the academy yet , I think in Indiana they can patrol up to a year without going through the academy if I remember what a friend told me right.

 

[UncleMike]

The incident occurred on Oct 5, 2010.
The Officer involved was fired on May 23, 2011.
There doesn't seem to be any more news on this eight month old story since 5/23/11.
If the incident happened as Officer Sergio Virgillo says it did then Chrisman deserves whatever punishment he receives.
A list of related articles is on the right side of this link page.

http://www.azcentral.com/community/.../20110323phoenix-police-richard-chrisman.html

 

[gunman41mag]

The incident occurred on Oct 5, 2010.
The Officer involved was fired on May 23, 2011.
There doesn't seem to be any more news on this eight month old story since 5/23/11.
If the incident happened as Officer Sergio Virgillo says it did then Chrisman deserves whatever punishment he receives.
A list of related articles is on the right side of this link page.

http://www.azcentral.com/community/.../20110323phoenix-police-richard-chrisman.html

It figures he got a soft baby slap on the wrist

 

[rambone]

Sorry for the old news. The YouTube video was a fresh upload when I found it.

 

[PatriotPride]

It figures he got a soft baby slap on the wrist

Do you expect anything different these days?

 

[UncleMike]

Sorry for the old news. The YouTube video was a fresh upload when I found it.

A little more research, and a little less sensationalism, would seem to be in order.

 

[rambone]

A little more research, and a little less sensationalism, would seem to be in order.

You've got the inside information. If you would have posted the story back in October, this wouldn't have happened.

 

[UncleMike]

You've got the inside information. If you would have posted the story back in October, this wouldn't have happened.

I used the web address from the photo and went to the newspapers site.
Then searched the name of the Officer.
Not exactly "inside" information.

 

[rambone]

I used the web address from the photo and went to the newspapers site.
Then searched the name of the Officer.
Not exactly "inside" information.

Did you get a warrant to perform that search?