We would not be reading the OP story or hundreds like it if they chose differently?
Gun control is good as long as you are in charge.
We would not be reading the OP story or hundreds like it if they chose differently?
Then all the youtube "evidence"... ha see my first post.
One even had a policeman in it!
Looks like we are done with the serious conversation for now.
Would you rather me post videos or evidence from physiology and/or kinesiology? You feel safer with an empty chamber. More power to you. Might as well throw your ****ing gun at them though.
But make sure you disengage the safety first...
I am saying that I believe the odds of me ever being in that situation are minimal. Even by the stats that BBI show you would still have the advantage in the majority of the cases he studied just by having a firearm.
I am willing to take that risk, and I believe it is a reasonable one.
If the situation is so unlikely, why even carry the gun at all?
The bathroom at the Macy's is nice. I've visited that one a time or two.
If the situation is so unlikely, why even carry the gun at all?
Why have a fire extinguisher? Why have a first-aid kit? Why have airbags in your car?
I think he is not questioning the validity of carrying. He is questioning the idea of an uncharged fire extinguisher or driving with your airbag unplugged, as it were. If one considers the need for an airbag to be so remote he unplugs it, why have it in your car at all?
i'll throw in my 2 cents since i have no sense.
I too am old fashioned. Until last year, I carried D/A safety on. I had taken classes in the past, but i continue to take more because i realize I didn't learn everything about life in high school and i haven't learned everything about guns.
After a couple of classes that introduced more stress into the equation, and it was low level in my opinion, once I forgot to present the firearm with the safety off. That was all it took for me. That one press of a trigger with no resistance to the back of the trigger guard taught me a valuable lesson.
seagulllplaya, I won't try to persuade you otherwise. I still disagree with the majority of people here probably in that I prefer a physical safety in my carry guns for the same reason I still prefer a hammer, visual and tactile. However it is now only engaged when I am holstering, undresssing, or otherwise handling the firearm for "everyday" reasons. For me, that feels "safer". But I will no longer carry with the safety engaged.
I never tried to rationalize the empty chamber scenario precisely because I am rather religious about my guns having safeties.
Agreed, but...An uncharged fire extinguisher or a disconnected airbag is useless. A firearm carried with the safety on, or with an empty chamber, is not. I look at method of carry as nothing more than another aspect of one's personal assessment of risk (such as weighing the risk of ND versus the risk of the firearm being inoperable when drawn, due to not disengaging the safety or not being able to chamber a round), and do not question or disparage someone's personal risk assessment if it differs from my own.
Agreed, but...
If that risk assessment is based on false information (e.g. I can readily rack the slide when necessary) the then the risk assessment is invalid.
While it may be easy to run drills for this, it's much hard to foresee possible scenarios and the risk that you will short stroke the slide or have a discharge when doing it (finger in the wrong place).