New IN resident - LTC questions

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • ECS686

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Dec 9, 2017
    1,772
    113
    Brazil
    Except, that part was struck down.


    Also, notice the new 'discharge firearm'
    (.pdf)

    Except as provided in subparagraph (B), it shall
    be unlawful for any person, knowingly or with reckless
    disregard for the safety of another, to discharge or attempt
    to discharge a firearm that has moved in or that otherwise
    affects interstate or foreign commerce at a place that the
    person knows is a school zone.
    (B) Subparagraph (A) does not apply to the discharge
    of a firearm—
    (i) on private property not part of school
    grounds;
    (ii) as part of a program approved by a school in
    the school zone, by an individual who is participating
    in the program;
    (iii) by an individual in accordance with a
    contract entered into between a school in a school
    zone and the individual or an employer of the
    individual; or
    (iv) by a law enforcement officer acting in his or
    her official capacity.
    (4) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as
    preempting or preventing a State or local government
    from enacting a statute establishing gun free school zones
    as provided in this subsection.
    Yes that had to do with commerce and they simply revised parts of the GCA of 1990. If you look deeper however the convection against one party Dorsey was upheld so it’s not a free Al and has not went to the USSC.

    So one is better off still with a state issues permit or LTCH or whatever
     
    Last edited:

    Mgderf

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    43   0   0
    May 30, 2009
    18,178
    113
    Lafayette
    Yes that had to do with commerce and they simply revised parts of the GCA of 1990. If you look deeper however the convection against one party Dorsey was upheld so it’s not a free Al and has not went to the USSC.

    So one is better off still with a state issues permit or LTCH or whatever
    There you go' making sense.
    Did you forget this is Ingo?
     

    hoglegs

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jul 21, 2017
    140
    43
    NWI
    I would get a copy of the relevant Illinois statute, laminate it, and keep it in your car.
    You may know transport is legal, I may know transport is legal, but expecting any random ISP officer to know is a fools errand.
    JMTC.
    Printed & laminated in my glove box:
    430 ILCS 66/40(e) Nothing in this Act shall prohibit a non-resident from transporting a concealed firearm within his or her vehicle in Illinois, if the concealed firearm remains within his or her vehicle and the non-resident:
    (1) is not prohibited from owning or possessing a​
    firearm under federal law;​
    (2) is eligible to carry a firearm in public under​
    the laws of his or her state or territory of residence, as evidenced by the possession of a concealed carry license or permit issued by his or her state of residence, if applicable; and​
    (3) is not in possession of a license under this Act.​
     
    Top Bottom