Does that extend to anyone that had relatives that sold slaves?Through they're long dead, yeah, they should've felt guilty owning slaves; that goes for anybody who owned slaves.
Does that extend to anyone that had relatives that sold slaves?Through they're long dead, yeah, they should've felt guilty owning slaves; that goes for anybody who owned slaves.
Does that extend to anyone that had relatives that sold slaves?
Why should it? BoR said:
I can be proud of my country and those who created it without taking credit for their actions.
I can be saddened by the actions of some who preceded me without accepting blame for their misdeeds.
I am not due a plug nickle for the good deeds that created this country, and
I owe not one red cent for the fact that some men, long dead, owned slaves, even if they mistreated them.
The kind of pride he is speaking of is a sense of admiration for the good work of others. He is admitting no self involvement. The opposite feeling he gets for their misdeeds he reports as sadness. Sadness is an appropriate feeling for that, and sadness is not shame. Shame is not a necessary emotion when one recognizes the wrongdoing in other people. Shame is appropriate when one is guilty or responsible for some wrongdoing in oneself or others. It is misplaced when one has no responsibility at all.
This whole discussion is about the kind of shame that people wield as a weapon of conformance. The understanding of responsibility making the difference is a defense against people who use shame as a weapon. I've found that not much pisses "shamers" off more than refusing to feel ashamed for something I didn't do. It makes them powerless to shame me out of my personal liberty. That was made very clear to me when I refused to be ashamed for being a gun owner after Sandy Hook.
I think I remember a post you made on that some time ago. Something to the effect that they drove like they didn't care because they literally didn't, because fate is not in their hands.
Sounds like Italy.
First, thanks to you, i read the Wikipedia article on Qatar, mostly because th a t was the one country I knew about the least. I see, according to the article, they practice Sharia law there and that Christian missionaries are not working in the open. That would make me wary because I do practice my faith actively and while not a missionary, I would, if asked, talk about my Christian faith.
Second, being Orthodox I know, second hand from those that had relatives under Ottoman rule, that Sharia law can be used to justify discrimination against Christians. For example, in Syria where Christian merchants had, in the past, to build their storefronts below street level so they had to look up to Muslim shoppers.
I don't consider myself anti-Muslim, as a Christian I strive to love all, but I would have reservations about encountering the one guy that would have a radical view in those countries, more so than in Chicago.
The above is mostly background commentary, I guess.
In your experience as law enforcement and working in country over there and hearing things, and I know this will be anecdotal, did the average Muslim provide tips to law enforcement in attempts to stop attacks? Did the average Muslim population provide leads/tips to help solve terrorist type attacks post event?
My uninformed mind has questioned in the past, "If the average Muslim Imam is against these things, why don't they speak out against them more?" Maybe i simply dont know where to look or havent tried hard enough. What American Muslim organizations have websites that are reflective of the typical American Muslim viewpoints? These questions have a legitimate answers, and I look forward to yours if it is something you have the background to answer. They are all asked simply in an inquisitive manner, not in an attempt to rile anyone up.
Unlike my comment in the 1911 thread.
Oh fun then. Basically, the only rule of the road is to get where you are going. Signs, lines, lights are all just for show.The gestures are different, and no swarms of mopeds...but yeah, real close.
I guess since slavery has been going on since the beginning of man,I guess that there is a lot of dead people who should feel bad.
I wonder what percentage of the world would qualify for that.Guilty, as if they need to atone for something they had no hand in? No. Just recognizing that you some rich douchers in your (speaking generally) family should be embarrassment enough.
I understand finding inspiration form the achievements of others. I don't think these achievements necessarily need to come from relatives, though I wouldn't exclude them either.
I just don't see any virtue or vice to be gained from the deeds or misdeeds of our ancestors either by relation or heritage.
We are what we make ourselves and should only gain notoriety or infamy based on our actions alone.
I guess since slavery has been going on since the beginning of man,I guess that there is a lot of dead people who should feel bad.
Feeling shame about the actions of people over whom you had no influence makes no sense. Not learning from their actions makes no sense either.
I doubt the majority of those through history that sold slaves were rich.Probably not a whole lot (noting that I mentioned "rich")
I doubt the majority of those through history that sold slaves were rich.
Do you believe that all of those in Africa that captured and sold other Africans were rich?
Does that extend to anyone that had relatives that sold slaves?
Guilty, as if they need to atone for something they had no hand in? No. Just recognizing that you some rich douchers in your (speaking generally) family should be embarrassment enough.
I did. You replied to that.Who said anything about "sold"? I said owned.
The gestures are different, and no swarms of mopeds...but yeah, real close.
No. You'd need to pick a side.After having too much time to think about some of these things, would a man who is half black and half white be ashamed for victimizing himself and/or owe himself reparations?