I agree, and would add that the weapon a Navy Seal carries is not something you strap on under a light shirt and wear throughout a day of shopping etc. The standards for the weapons they carry must meet a much higher level of environments. A gun that carries and works well for police, Feds, etc. is not the same one that is going to drop into the ocean, scuba up to the muddy shore, be sprayed by sand in the desert, etc. etc. The Navy Seal weapons are chosen also because the environments they are subjected to put them in a whole other class. I also add that although most here shoot, and don't limp wrist a handgun, the heavier weight of a Sig not only helps me stay on target, it will give weight for the slide to push giving it a much lower chance of jamming when fired. A light polymer gun is more apt to do this than the old heavy ones.Remember that this is the choice weapon of navy seals - I would classify them as top instructors. I own an mk25 which is basically a 226 and it is one of the more accurate and reliable weapons I own.. Also- some top instructors are paid by manufactures or get many perks.
...I routinely carry a P226 . Not sure what the fuss is about for daily carry.
Reading through this thread I get the impression that the 226 is a great combat firearm. It gets high marks from law enforcement, military and people interested in SHTF scenarios and home defense.
The gamers seem to be a little less enthusiastic about them, though they still do like them. Maybe just not as much as other options for stuff like IDPA, USPSA, etc.
I am torn. I have shot my brothers 226 and I like it. But I also think I want something if I take up USPSA one day. I am really okay with my 1911 9mm for IDPA and I'd probably use my Ruger MKII for Steel Challenge.
But I still think I should have at least one high capacity 9mm pistol.
I also prefer to stay with recognized brands that hold/increase their value and appeal to a broad range of buyers. And that means for handguns, it would most likely be Smith, Ruger, Sig.
Dont be so sure. I know a guy that shoots a P226 in competition. He loves his sigs. On the top levels, what you see in competitors hands is a function of who is giving them money. If you handed them a British Bulldog they would still outshoot most of us. They spend their time working on the shooter, not the gun. The 226 is an awesome weapon, and I'll own another one at some point.
Good point. We seem to forget that if competitors had to purchase their "tools", they may very well be using something different.
I think of bicycle racers who ride $8,000 bikes(provided to them at no cost) and the recreational rider who goes out and buys one to be just like them. The racer is earning a living with it, unlike the recreational rider who rides for fun.
Yep. Put me on Lance Armstrong's Trek, and put Lance on a $150 Walmart bike and he will still destroy me. Equipment is nice, and I've got a $2,300 BH. But at the end of the day, whether it is bikes, pistols, or tiddlywinks, it's more about the Indian than it is the arrow.