What about the whole admitted gang banger/past prison time for gun and violent felon status? Should Barney had just assumed he decided to settle down and call him up on the phone before he came over to figure out what time worked best?
Someone isn't reading the newspapers.Sorry boss, stopped reading at this...
You want to live around violent drug dealing gang bangers that cops do **** all about?, so be it.
That's why I moved outa gary.
Someone isn't reading the newspapers.
I have heard first hand accounts of arrests and searches being done in war zones with less violence.
This is pathetic.
I really hate to see dogs get shot. I've done hundreds of entries in terrible neighborhoods with every kind of dog and never had to shoot even one...especially if a flash bang goes off, they usually run like hell and hide. I love dogs...people not so much.
News Flash:
Of course CI's are sh*tbags. Do you think Sally from the local PTO has information about any drug houses?..No! These guys know about dope houses because they are out in the streets hangin' with other sh*tbags. They all hang out together, sharing needles, not stopping by your book club to talk about 50 Shades of Grey
Moses wasn't revered as much.Understanding the nature of CI's isn't the problem so much as the extent to which their word is taken for gold standard. I am happy to hear of situations as is the case in Indianapolis in which little is left to chance on the integrity of such people. I have also seen jurisdictions in which their word is treated as gospel and they are allowed to get away with enough crap that the neighbors figured out why they never get arrested and were approaching the point of taking care of it themselves. In one case this did not happen only because the CI was bad enough that the feds dropped in and ended his little party being done with the tacit approval of the local authorities before something bad happened to him at the hands of his non-criminal neighbors.
That said, understanding that that folks at First Baptist probably don't know much about the criminal underbelly of the community is one thing. Expecting that the word of a CI who has a vested interest in throwing other people under the bus not be taken as truth at face value and acted upon without independent verification is something else. I would be extremely unforgiving if I were to get SWATed courtesy of a CI who doesn't have anyone else to turn in that week and mentally runs down the road until he randomly thinks of someone to nominate.
There's a lot more to getting a search warrant through a CI than just his word. Most prosecutors require audio and video surveillance from a CI as proof of a crime occurring before a search warrant is even considered. With technology these days getting audio and video is nothing. You wouldn't believe the small recording devices we have now.
Good to hear that this is the standard to which you are accustomed. Unfortunately, a lot of us who tend to be skeptical are skeptical based on experience with local officials and law enforcement who are, well, not so conscientious about how they conduct business.
Based on actual experience, or stuff posted on the internet?
There are also CI's who make a living out of being a CI. They aren't actual criminals, and it is seriously their "job". You bring in good tips, you get paid. More good tips, more $$$. If a guy has been giving you good leads for years, you can probably trust (but verify) his information. It's not in the intrest of the CI to give bad leads cause that's $$$ our of his pocket. You might get a 2nd chance, but your not getting a 3rd. Not all CI's are flipped crackheads trying to get out of trouble.