Trumps Cabinet...Whom will he appoint??

[T.Lex]

Just another day making America great again.

Any chance of you walking me through the process of bringing Bannon onto the team, giving him authority, then parting with him, and then this all come together into making America great again?

 

[bwframe]

Any chance of you walking me through the process of bringing Bannon onto the team, giving him authority, then parting with him, and then this all come together into making America great again?

I'd tell you, but then I'd have to...

 

[jamil]

...stretch your imagination?

 

[indiucky]

Awkward for Bannon, Trump, and those who've supported both.

I supported both...And I am enjoying this.....

I supported Benedict Arnold(Along with CM...We both served under him)...He was great at Saratoga...And then...Well...You know the rest of the story...

 

[T.Lex]

I'd tell you, but then I'd have to...

... make stuff up?

Looks like the White House is doubling down on attacking Bannon. How long before he's photoshopped out of pics?

 

[KLB]

... make stuff up?

Looks like the White House is doubling down on attacking Bannon. How long before he's photoshopped out of pics?

Make it so he was never part of the staff. Strike all record of his existence.

 

[Kutnupe14]

... make stuff up?

Looks like the White House is doubling down on attacking Bannon. How long before he's photoshopped out of pics?

All I'm saying, is that if he ends up in Mexico, that doesn't bode well for Brannon's future.

 

[BugI02]

You thinking icepick?

 

[bwframe]

I think Trump and Bannon cooked this up to get nevertrumper panties in a bunch.

Ding, ding, ding...Success!

 

[T.Lex]

I think Trump and Bannon cooked this up to get nevertrumper panties in a bunch.

Ding, ding, ding...Success!

Seems like the presidential panties are the ones bunched.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...plosive-book-michael-wolff-publis/1003451001/

 

[Fargo]

Seems like the presidential panties are the ones bunched.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...plosive-book-michael-wolff-publis/1003451001/

In fairness, if Twitter is a reliable indicator, when was the last time they seemed unbunched? Now, of course, it is a huge bunch, possibly the best bunch ever, maybe even so good he has gotten tired of being bunched....

 

[HoughMade]

I noticed that....Must be some bad blood there....

Whoever Bannon's supporters are, or who he may be pandering to....I'm pretty sure they are no fans of Kushner's "blood".

 

[Expat]

I used to listen to Bannon on the radio before the Trump days. He never sounded like a whackadoo back then.

 

[T.Lex]

I used to listen to Bannon on the radio before the Trump days. He never sounded like a whackadoo back then.

You sure?

 

[BugI02]

Whoever Bannon's supporters are, or who he may be pandering to....I'm pretty sure they are no fans of Kushner's "blood".

So you're saying they're probably not Ben Shapiro fans, either?

 

[HoughMade]

So you're saying they're probably not Ben Shapiro fans, either?

I see more than a few listening, shaking their heads and muttering something like: "for a mud person, he makes some good sense."

 

[bwframe]

Wow

 

[jamil]

So now Bannon is saying he regrets what the book says? Did Trump offer him a free lifetime vacation off world?

 

[Kutnupe14]

So now Bannon is saying he regrets what the book says? Did Trump offer him a free lifetime vacation off world?

While I know the president like people who have slighted him to publicly apologize. Both he and Bannon should have kept their mouths shut. The fact that the president attacked Bannon, and Bannpn apologized means that there's at least some truth in books reporting. You're not going to convince anybody, but the most loyal "Trump can do no wrong" automatons, that everything in the book is false, 'cept for the parts concerning Bannon's recollections.

 

[BugI02]

A Trump attacks Bannon
B Bannon apologizes

C Therefore the book contains some truth

Ha ha ha. You'd best diagram that purported tautology for me, because I think you left out a lot of premises (or my supposition, your conclusion is faulty) Go ahead, we'll wait for the rest of the evidence to support that conclusion

This might help

[h=2]Valid Arguments[/h]Direct reasoning is the most basic form of valid reasoning.

A -> B If the car is red then the car is mine.
A The car is red.
Therefore, B Therefore, the car is mine.((A -> B) ^ A) -> B

​

Indirect reasoning is based on the fact that a statement and its contrapositive are equivalent.

A -> B If the car is red then the car is mine.
~B The car is not mine.
Therefore, ~A Therefore, the car is not red.((A -> B) ^ ~B) -> ~ A

A third form of valid reasoning is transitive reasoning.

A -> B If the car is red then the car is mine.
B -> C If the car is mine then the tire is flat.
Therefore, A -> C Therefore, if the car is red then the tire is flat.((A -> B) ^ (B -> C)) -> (A -> C)