If HPA passes, the cost of supressors will go down. Drastically so.
New Zealand Silencers: Cheap and Unregulated - The Truth About Guns
New Zealand Silencers: Cheap and Unregulated - The Truth About Guns
If HPA passes, the cost of supressors will go down. Drastically so.
New Zealand Silencers: Cheap and Unregulated - The Truth About Guns
Well, that's another reason I don't own any suppressors. I have a hard time justifying anywhere from $300-$1000+ for some easily manufactured and assembled parts. Reminds me of that stupid "modern" dining table my wife bought. Now, I do like the modern look, but you buy modern furniture and you end up paying way more for the look than the quality of parts and assembly. That table is a piece of **** that should only have cost $150. I'm too embarrassed to admit what we paid for it. I chalk it up to lesson learned.
Same thing with suppressers in a way. You're paying a premium way beyond the tax for the novelty of privilege. **** that. That price isn't reasonable for the assembly of parts. Shooting suppressed just isn't worth that to me.
But if they're taken off of NFA, once that novelty goes away and just anyone can have one, it's perceived value will drop like a used rubber. I doubt we'll pay as little as $.65 for a suppressor, but I'll bet we'll see a lot more guns with integrated suppressors on the market, and without a very large markup for it.
And those of us with suppressors thank you for not having them, even though you decided to grace us with your "opinion". BTW I doubt a suppressor will ever cost 65 cents but as someone who can can read accurately and comprehend said read material I presume you are attempting to reference the exchange rate between the NZ and US dollar inaccurately. But then I could be wrong as I don't post just for the sake of posting.
Dan
Personally, I don't have a problem with you thinking they're over priced, but I think it's only fair for you to admit it's a matter of personal preference. For example, I think Harley Davidson is absolute junk - I can't stand the way they sound. I wouldn't pay $10 for one. If one were given to me, I'd waste no time selling it to the first person to give me an offer. On the other hand, there are people who love them and think they're worth every penny they paid.
To me, suppressors are worth every penny. I don't mind the high prices, and the $200 stamp doesn't bother me. I'm to the point that I don't really care to shoot Unsuppressed, and I don't mind paying for that. The money isn't stopping me from buying more, it's the Damn hoops that I have to jump through.
Perceived value...
Personally, I don't have a problem with you thinking they're over priced, but I think it's only fair for you to admit it's a matter of personal preference. For example, I think Harley Davidson is absolute junk - I can't stand the way they sound. I wouldn't pay $10 for one. If one were given to me, I'd waste no time selling it to the first person to give me an offer. On the other hand, there are people who love them and think they're worth every penny they paid.
To me, suppressors are worth every penny. I don't mind the high prices, and the $200 stamp doesn't bother me. I'm to the point that I don't really care to shoot Unsuppressed, and I don't mind paying for that. The money isn't stopping me from buying more, it's the Damn hoops that I have to jump through.
Perceived value...
I think I wanna post a poll to see if Glock fans are more likely to drive Jap bikes than 1911 fans.
I have a Harley, a 1911, and an M&P collection. No Glocks here.
I can't participate in that poll. I don't have a Harley (though it's on my bucket list). I do have a 1911, M&Ps. Walthers. Rugers. I am Glock free with no current plans to change that. It's not that I'm a hater. I'm just not interested at this time.
I get the bug sometimes for stuff though. I may get the bug for a suppressor that is stronger than my distaste for the price and process. I recently got a SW22 Victory that has a threaded barrel. It keeps nagging me for one but I keep telling it to STFU, I don't wanna spend the money on that.
I like Glocks and 1911s, they both suppress nice.I think I wanna post a poll to see if Glock fans are more likely to drive Jap bikes than 1911 fans.
If the HPA passes, you could throw a legal, stamp free 5' long can on an 11" long barrel, then pin and weld it and have a zero stamp gun.I want my INGO AR to be a 2 stamp gun. Chop and thread the barrel and put a can on it. That's the dream. Lots of hoops, though.
If the HPA passes, you could throw a legal, stamp free 5' long can on an 11" long barrel, then pin and weld it and have a zero stamp gun.
'murica
I like Glocks and 1911s, they both suppress nice.
They are overpriced if you simply look at the construction. However, gov't regulation is an expense the manufacturer's have to recoup. And as for materials, a good silencer is precision machined from high grade materials. Take the Optimus as an example. The "can" isn't just a pipe. It's machined from high grade stainless steel billet. The machine time alone to make one is pretty extensive. You get a can, 5 normal baffles, a heavy blast baffle, an extension/blast shield, a muzzle break, to end caps, a retaining ring, and a booster assembly. All of which are precision machined so you get to keep your firearm and your face. So, yes, they're expensive, but to say they're overpriced is a bit narrow sighted.
If the HPA passes, you could throw a legal, stamp free 5' long can on an 11" long barrel, then pin and weld it and have a zero stamp gun.
'murica
I think I wanna post a poll to see if Glock fans are more likely to drive Jap bikes than 1911 fans.
Ooh, can we say that now??