The link is just for reference. I wouldn’t necessarily prefer one over the other.TheUziButton, is there a reason you choose the AN/PVS-14 over the Night enforcer PVS-14?
True. Milspec = pass/fail while commercial market = detailed spec sheet. Quality beyond the given minimum spec tends to be luck of the draw. All tubes have imperfections and performance variations.While the AN is the milspec, I have heard that the quality of the AN (while extremely awesome) usually only meet the standards of the mil spec testing. While in the commercial market and the NE/PVS-14, the tubes cannot be technically called mil spec, the tubes might be a bit cleaner
This video perhaps? Either way, the video is very informative and makes for excellent reference material for others.(so I have heard from some video that TNVS put out a while back).
Both would be a winning choice. The TNV/PVS-14 is an excellent bang for your buck.Just wondering as I was originally looking to purchase a NE/PVS-14 or the TVS/PVS-14 in the next couple months (after I save up enough) and now you got me second guessing myself.
Have any pictures?AN/PVS-22 sitting in front of a US Optics 3.2-17x TPAL on my .308, the combo works nicely
Have any pictures?
^^^ tacticool to the max but that laser setup is freaking awesome. Is it on center with the bore? If so that is a badass setup
How is the spill on your IR WML? I was thinking of getting one to replace my IR SF G2 but I was unsure about what the beam looked like. I would be using it for an IR helmet mounted navigation light so I would rather have more spill and less throw. What is the run time? Does the activation button have an audible click or is it stealthy?
Damnit Glenn . . . . . . that front sight is cool. Now I gotta spend more $$ on my SBR.