Where do you make a stand?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Lmo1131

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 11, 2020
    556
    93
    east of the Pacific
    When is enough enough?

    Not sayin, but just sayin. If they come to take you away to an indefinite Covid Camp, what do you all expect to happen?

    Remember they floated this idea a year ago. It was a 'conspiracy theory' then, now it isn't; it's happening in Australia and the Netherlands.

    Everything they 'suggest' or 'consider' has already been decided. Your outrage only extends the timeline for it. The Govt. already has the precedent for denial of rights prior to any crime thanks to red flag laws. Thank the compromising by RINO traitors for that one.

    1639960488292.png

    Here's the complete Bill >https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2021/a416

    New York Legislation Provides for Indefinite Detention of Unvaccinated at Governor’s Whim.
    https://thenationalpulse.com/news/ne...overnors-whim/

    In the next legislative session beginning January 5th, 2022, the New York Senate and Assembly could vote on a bill that would grant permissions to remove and detain cases, contacts, carriers, or anyone suspected of presenting a “significant threat to public health” and remove them from public life on an indefinite basis.

    Bill A416 presents a serious risk to the basic liberties of all Americans in the state of New York, including their right to choose whether or not to receive medical treatment and vaccinations related to thus far undetermined contagious diseases.

    The bill gives the Governor of New York, his or her delegates – including but not limited to the commissioner and heads of local health departments – the right to remove and detain any individuals or groups of people through issuing a single order. The orders only have to include the individual’s name(s) or “reasonably specific descriptions of the individuals or groups.”

    The department can decide to hold a person or group of people in a medical facility or any other they deem appropriate. The language is purposefully vague.

    Though the bill attempts to state that no one shall be held for more than 60 days, the language allows for court orders to waive this maximum detention time. After 60 days, the court is allowed an additional 90 days to consider the detention of an individual, a cycle that can last indefinitely per the opinion of the department.

    It goes on to state that the Bill will “require an individual who has been exposed to or infected by a contagious disease to complete an appropriate, prescribed course of treatment, preventive medication or vaccination,” essentially giving the government the right to detain anyone they want and forcibly vaccinate them.

    As the language of the bill refers to individuals or groups who “potentially” pose a threat, the bill is a preemptive strike against anyone the the department believes has the capacity to “pose a threat in the future, such as those refusing to receive the COVID-19 vaccination.

    There is no explicit reference to what types of contagious diseases qualify a person to be removed from public life, detained in a facility, and forced into medical treatment and vaccination. Anyone can technically be held in isolation until they are deemed non-contagious, which would also raise questions over whether those carrying HIV/AIDS could be released back into society.

    The bill has received an overwhelmingly negative response on the NY Senate website. Commenters have stated that, “this is disturbing and sets up a terrible precedent for future law. The governor can basically detain whoever [he/she] likes on the basis of scanty evidence. This is un-American. It reminiscent of the Soviet Union locking up political opponents on the basis that they were “mentally unstable”. We CANNOT allow this in our state.”

    But wait! There's more if you are lucky enough to resident in New York.

    Although this is horrifying enough there New Yorkers have lined up several more bills for vote next session that are equally abhorrent in terms of human rights violations.

    Bill # A08378 would require immunization against COVID-19 for attendance at school.

    Bill # A00279 would require a health care provider who administers an immunization to a person nineteen years of age or older to report such information to the department of health or to a regional health information organization – essentially establishing a statewide database

    Bill # A02240 / S00045 would require mandatory influenza /flu vaccine for persons / children attending daycare.

    Bill # A08398 would limit exemptions from immunization requirements by local governments and private entities to medical exemptions; repeals religious exemptions for certain post-secondary students.

    Bill # A03192 / S03041 would permit any child who is at least fourteen years of age to have administered to himself or herself, regardless of parental consent, certain immunizations required or recommended by law.

    Bill # A00822 / S00937 would allow children to be administered STD treatments without parental consent.

    – and if this wouldn’t be enough New York State Assemblyman Patrick Burke (D-Buffalo) is proposing a bill that would give health insurance companies the option to deny Covid treatment for the unvaccinated.

    https://covid-crime.org/bill-a416-detention/
     

    jake blue

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 9, 2013
    841
    93
    Lebanon
    First they came for the Communists
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a Communist

    Then they came for the Socialists
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a Socialist

    Then they came for the trade unionists
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a trade unionist

    Then they came for the Jews
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a Jew

    Then they came for me
    And there was no one left
    To speak out for me

    - Martin Niemöller, Lutheran pastor who supported Hitler's rise to power.
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 7, 2021
    2,658
    113
    central indiana
    It seems the king keeps drawing the line behind me and then accusing me of overstepping it. Yet I haven't moved. I suspect the king's first move will be to somehow isolate the 'dirty'. Once the 'dirty' have been weakened by isolation, lack of supplies and societal scorn, then the roundup can start. As stated by others: If not now, when? If not us, who?
     

    Leadeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 19, 2009
    36,998
    113
    .
    Somewhere the terms unvaccinated and contagious were merged in this mess by NIH/CDC/ big media/Fauci or whoever.

    THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING.

    Plenty of contagious vaccinated folks though.
     

    daddyusmaximus

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 98.9%
    90   1   0
    Aug 21, 2013
    8,674
    113
    Remington
    – and if this wouldn’t be enough New York State Assemblyman Patrick Burke (D-Buffalo) is proposing a bill that would give health insurance companies the option to deny Covid treatment for the unvaccinated.

    https://covid-crime.org/bill-a416-detention/
    Deny treatment to unvaccinated?
    I wonder if this would include all those unvaccinated illegals they're bringing in?
     
    Top Bottom