How can any LEO defend this..........................................
really you are going too try to defend this unlawful attack on this home owners property...........
Don't try to twist the story to make it in the officers favor the facts are the animal was secured period....... there was no reason to use deadly force ........were was his pepper spray ? the officer suffered no injury's from the animal............ how can a chained animal make a well trained officer in fear of his life and to top it all off he was at the wrong address thats not the home owner fault ...... and the call he was on wasn't a life threating 911 dispatch......
with your media type twist of this i can do the same ........the officer was at the wrong house giving a guy 5 more minutes to kill his wife at the correct address, is that a wise idea....
Your post is full of holes...
ie
-a secured animal, can be one in a fence surrounding a home and be a threat to those that enter the vacinity. Can a chained animal not do the same.
-pepper spray, not all officers carry it (I don't)
-unlawful attack on property? (prove intent) ie would the officer had gone to the home and shot the animal if not doing police business
-Not a life threatening 911 call? Then perhaps domestics should be downgraded in line with calls similar to lockouts (get to them when you can)
-My media type twist? You're taking all your facts from the "liberal media," right? And we know how often they tell the FULL story.