Ejected from Cabela's for open-carrying

[jsgolfman]

No, you didn't say he was on welfare but the implication of your statement was clear.

 

[Nakatomi]

Kinda interesting that he is still green

Amazingly, for every red I get from the frothing OC people, I get a green or two from others thanking me for standing up to your bully tactics and expressing my opinion. Many people don't want to be targeted publicly with your kookery, and I don't blame them. Wading through the barrage of your nonsense is hard work.

 

[bigg cheese]

*yawn*

Take it to PM's

 

[Rookie]

Amazingly, for every red I get from the frothing OC people, I get a green or two from others thanking me for standing up to your bully tactics and expressing my opinion. Apparently you are not as popular as you think you are while you stand around patting each other on the back. Many people don't want to be targeted publicly with your kookery, and I don't blame them. Wading through the barrage of your nonsense is hard work.

A little fact that you don't know. I don't OC. Another fact which you obviously cannot grasp - I don't attack people for their choices.

 

[jeremy]

Amazingly, for every red I get from the frothing OC people, I get a green or two from others thanking me for standing up to your bully tactics and expressing my opinion. Many people don't want to be targeted publicly with your kookery, and I don't blame them. Wading through the barrage of your nonsense is hard work.

Sir you are the one who begun all the name calling and degenerated this thread from a discussion on how respond to a corporation on one of their chain stores, into a flaming argument over OC'ing or not, and insulting as many people as you can.

YMMV!

 

[jsgolfman]

For the sake of sane discussion, please refrain from calling those of us who OC "kooks" or the act of OC'ing "kookery". I appreciate you have opinions, but your opinions might just as well be called nonsense.
Earlier you presented your opinion as fact concerning the OC'er being hit with a brick. I asked you to provide a documented example before presenting incidents such as this as fact. You have thus far ignored my request and failed to address it.

 

[Roadie]

I didn't say he was on welfare, did I? Are you one of Bill Clinton's speechwriters perchance?

Actually, you fit this description better than anyone else. You insult people, then try to spin it to make yourself look like the victim. You started insulting OCers, you insulted my choice of carry weapon, you insulted others, then you insinuated that I was on welfare. ...but poor Nakatomi, he is the one being bullied here, right? Typical left wing victim mentality, at it's finest.

I suppose next you will want reparations for the emotional damage done to you here.

 

[ATM]

Nakatomi,

I suspect you haven't switched to or started a new OC vs CC thread because you're having more fun trying to work people up while walking the line of insulting innuendo.

Or maybe you don't have any debate at all. Your few points upthread were dismissed pretty easily and you didn't try to resupport them.

So why are you hanging around this particular thread?

 

[mikea46996]

Wow I am running out quick does anybody know of a local supplier for this stuff?!?!

 

[iam1096]

Back to why the tread was started. Corporate is backing us. I think all should write to them and tell them what you think. I know corporations hate losing money.

 

[Scutter01]

Alright, for the last time, keep the OC/CC debate out of this thread. Not only has it veered wildly off-course, but you can't seem to keep it civil, either, and I don't want to have to close the thread.

 

[mikea46996]

iam thank you for posting the attachment also. I am waiting for a response from my cancelled internet order. I gave them the reason so I am hoping once they start processing things today somebody sees it and gets the ball rolling.

 

[Nakatomi]

Nakatomi,

I suspect you haven't switched to or started a new OC vs CC thread because you're having more fun trying to work people up while walking the line of insulting innuendo.

Or maybe you don't have any debate at all. Your few points upthread were dismissed pretty easily and you didn't try to resupport them.

So why are you hanging around this particular thread?

Because you keep addressing me directly, perhaps? Do you not want a response?

Fear not. The vocal mob will prevail, and my dissenting opinion will be swept away as others before mine have, I am sure. This forum is not interested in opposing viewpoints; just to exist as a mutual support group for a few who want to bask in the glow of their right-wing self righteousness.

How many of you have icons or slogans insulting our President? Painting him as a Nazi, for example? I love this country, and he is our Commander in Chief. If you can't show our own president any respect, I certainly don't expect any from you either.

I for one feel privileged to have been part of this conversation. I have learned in very short order those people I would want to associate with in events, and those I would go to great lengths to avoid.

 

[tv1217]

It's funny to see a person resort to argumentum ad hominem when they're losing a debate.

 

[ATM]

From the INGO FAQ:
https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/carry_...n_hammond.html
https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...nse/17675-my_experiences_with_open_carry.htmlhttps://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/carry_...pen_carry.html

Feel free to continue in these threads. I will not go off topic again in this one.

 

[theweakerbrother]

It's funny to see a person resort to argumentum ad hominem when they're losing a debate.

Repped for proper use of "ad hominem!"

 

[spartan933]

Imagine if you were wearing, let's say, a Colts jersey.

Yeah, we have that problem up here. People wear Colts jerseys all of the time, but I would never tell them that I should not have to look at it.

Still though, that's really F****d up. I was just getting ready to head over to Cabelas to take a look around and I have my trusty 1911 in an IWB. What's the F***ing difference whether it's OC or CC, as long as you have a license, you shouldn't be punished.

 

[Nakatomi]

Repped for proper use of "ad hominem!"

I hate to nitpic, but I used the term ad hominem in this thread about four days ago. I've got dibs.

 

[IndyBeerman]

Oh goodness. Reduced to spelling and grammar flames? You OC'ers are really running out of steam now. Will you be upset if I called you a retard, or would you prefer "intelligence challenged"?

Clip: noun Date:15th century 1: any of various devices that grip, clasp, or hook2: a device to hold cartridges for charging the magazines of some rifles ; also : a magazine from which ammunition is fed into the chamber of a firearm3: a piece of jewelry held in position by a clip

Eat yer heart out, Webster wins.

Sorry, Webster does not win on this one, and the reference of Concealed was for emphasis not for spelling or grammar flames.

Also I never stated that I was a OC or CC, so get that out of the equation... so in my last offical post to you, and never having to see one from you again except in a reply by another member I leave you with this, and I'll make it large and slow so you can try to fully understand what Scutter was referring to in the orginal post.


IT'S NOT ABOUT CONCEALED OR OPEN CARRY IT'S ABOUT FAILURE TO ADHERE TO CORPORATE POLICY BY AN INDIVIDUAL THAT DOES NOT FOLLOW IT.

If you can't understand the above enlarged type, I'm truly sorry I tried to make it simple for you.

Am I anti-gun? lol! The people on here who know me in real life

Still have not seen those so-called friends coming to your defense, they must be in your head.

Don't bother replying, you are now my first
ignore.

I'm off of this unless it falls back under Scutters orginal post about Cabela's Corporate Policy.

 

[cce1302]

I hate to nitpic, but I used the term ad hominem in this thread about four days ago. I've got dibs.

By "nitpic" do you mean to say "lie"?
This thread was started Saturday night, which is not quite 2 days ago.