.38 Snubby ammo choice

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Jaybird1980

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jan 22, 2016
    11,929
    113
    North Central
    If she is recoil sensitive the LCR may not be comfortable for her. If she doesnt mind it then most factory defense rounds are gonna be good. The Speer short barrel is very good at taming muzzle flash.
     

    Jaybird1980

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jan 22, 2016
    11,929
    113
    North Central
    Its true that you might not notice recoil and flash under stress, but if it bothers you when you are not stressed then you will more than likely not train and practice with it.
     

    Tactically Fat

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Oct 8, 2014
    8,357
    113
    Indiana
    I'd MUCH rather shoot my wife's aunt's LCR with +p loads than I would my 642 with the same load.

    I find the felt recoil of the LCR to be MUCH more manageable than in the airweight.
     

    Tactically Fat

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Oct 8, 2014
    8,357
    113
    Indiana
    I think the LCR shoots softer as well.

    Combination of the grip size & shape AND the polymer flexing *just enough* to mitigate.

    No matter what stocks I have on my 642...it sucks. Sucks bad. Factory rubber - sucks. Walnut boot grips? Major suckage. Much larger Hogue Tamer grips? sucks. I just can't win. :(
     

    VERT

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Jan 4, 2009
    9,820
    113
    Seymour
    Combination of the grip size & shape AND the polymer flexing *just enough* to mitigate.

    No matter what stocks I have on my 642...it sucks. Sucks bad. Factory rubber - sucks. Walnut boot grips? Major suckage. Much larger Hogue Tamer grips? sucks. I just can't win. :(

    Nut Up Buttercup. :stickpoke:

    You should try the hard plastic Crimson Trace grips. Ouch! I went back to the factory rubber stocks. Gun recoils hard enough that the cylinder latch rips the skin off my right thumb. But I have shot that darn little gun past 50 yards and can legitimately pass the FBI course of fire with it. Neither is something I would attempt with a micro .380.
     

    spqr

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Jun 15, 2010
    91
    8
    Zionsville
    My LCR .357 Mag seems to have significantly less recoil than my 442 and 637 with equivalent 38 special loads. Also, I noticed that the LCR seems to be more accurate with heavier loads e.g. 158 grains, whereas, all my snubby Smiths (2.5" and less) seem to like significantly lighter bullet weights. I still have a box of 125 gr Fed NyClad that I load when I carry my J-frames (they were very accurate with these), however, shorter barrel Smiths also like 130 gr FMJ (for practice), 125 gr SJHP 38+P, and 110 gr frangible.
     

    in625shooter

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 21, 2008
    2,136
    48
    Your well pressed to get consistant expansion from a 38 snub but with that said some of the better performing 38's are the Hornady critical defense, any of the Gold Dot and the golden saber does extremely well at both penitration and expansion in snubby's more time than not.
     

    Wolfhound

    Hired Goon
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    45   0   0
    Apr 11, 2011
    3,997
    149
    Henry County
    I read somewhere that using +P ammunition in a snub nosed revolver is a bad idea. The reasoning was that the barrel was too short to burn all the powder in the +P load and the excess powder became a large muzzle flash as it was burned after the bullet exited the barrel. The article also mentioned the flash could be detrimental to the shooter attempting follow up shots in a low light environment.

    Is this an old wives tale or is there some truth to it?
     

    VERT

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Jan 4, 2009
    9,820
    113
    Seymour
    I read somewhere that using +P ammunition in a snub nosed revolver is a bad idea. The reasoning was that the barrel was too short to burn all the powder in the +P load and the excess powder became a large muzzle flash as it was burned after the bullet exited the barrel. The article also mentioned the flash could be detrimental to the shooter attempting follow up shots in a low light environment.

    Is this an old wives tale or is there some truth to it?

    Possible depending on the load. More of an issue with .357 snubs. Magnum cartridges must utilize a slower burning powder to achieve the necessary velocities. Slow powder and short barrels don't mix. I personally see little value in magnum cartridges in 2" barrels. 38+p is a different animal because pressure and projectile velocity are two different things. Using a fast burning powder with a heavy bullet can result in a lot of pressure but doesn't mean it will move any faster. Also premium defense ammo often uses powder with a flash suppressant. My suggestion is to carry a quality .38 +P short barrel load.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,918
    113
    I read somewhere that using +P ammunition in a snub nosed revolver is a bad idea. The reasoning was that the barrel was too short to burn all the powder in the +P load and the excess powder became a large muzzle flash as it was burned after the bullet exited the barrel. The article also mentioned the flash could be detrimental to the shooter attempting follow up shots in a low light environment.

    Is this an old wives tale or is there some truth to it?


    I've yet to see a shooting where the shooter reported muzzle flash was an issue. Self defense shootings tend to be real up close and personal affairs and even the "low light" tends to be lit well enough that night sight isn't playing much of a role.

    However, if there is a lot of muzzle flash, it's affecting the other guy too at the distances you're likely involved at. I *suspect* that muzzle flash and noise play in to psychological stops, but have no real way to prove it. In short, I think it's likely a wash. If the ammunition is otherwise accurate, reliable, and offers good terminal ballistics THEN I might start to compare muzzle flash.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,918
    113
    I'm changing over to Underwood for all my defensive pistols. A likely choice for you would be their 100 grain .38 SPL Xtreme Defender. https://www.underwoodammo.com/pistol-ammunition/

    If you want to pay more for boutique ammo, that's up to you, but it won't work any better than standard wadcutters. They are simply taking a light for caliber projectile, cranking up the speed, and then throwing in the "bullet voodoo" marketing twist for the propeller design. I'd still go with a heavier wadcutter at lower speeds.

    Claiming a permanent wound channel twice as big as expanding ammunition...BS. A temporary cavity in clear gel, maybe, but in real meat it doesn't work that way. People have been trying this since at least the Devel bullet, and it's never as magical as they claim.
     
    Top Bottom