Innocent man in vegetative state after mistaken identity with the law

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • tenring

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 16, 2008
    1,999
    38
    Martinsville
    Another question, who is paying for the hospital bill, how much is it costing per day, who is paying the family bills while the guy is in the coma? I tend to ask these questions from time to time.
     

    phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    18,941
    113
    Arcadia
    Should it make sense that the actions of a crazy person in Arizona should impact what accessories I can legally purchase for my rifle? Police Sheriff Dupnik thinks so.

    No, it absolutely does not and I think you will find 100% agreement with everyone on this board about that issue. That was the point I was trying to make and explaining my frustration at some of these threads. We all want and expect personal responsibility when someone does something stupid but all to often threads involving LEO's quickly transform from "him" to "them" and we are all guilty.

    I have no problem holding anyone responsible for their actions, it just gets frustrating having to share that responsibility. I also have no problem with the prejudice a lot of the members here have concerning LEO's. I think it is human nature to be prejudiced to some extent. I admit to being prejudiced, I judge people based on a variety of factors but I am also open to realizing that those prejudices were unfounded once I begin interacting with someone.
     

    CVMA544

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Sep 26, 2010
    378
    16
    SW Indiana
    I'd like to consider myself as being reasonable. My Uncle was in LE and was someone I always looked up to. When I was hired he gave me a piece of advice; "Work hard, be fair to the public and support the people you work with". I had that advice laminated on a piece of paper which has ridden behind the LE ID in my wallet every day since I have had a badge.

    I know I've said this before but I repeat it because I am proud of it. I have 12 years on the job. I have worked four years in undercover narcotics, three years on a high activity uniformed patrol unit and eight years on SWAT. I have never received any discipline, received a complaint or been sued. I have been in two vehicle pursuits (and numerous shorter) that lasted more than twenty minutes with no crashes other than the bad guys car and no innocent people were injured. I have had a Taser for ten years and have never used it. I have also never been given an award of any kind which is just how I like it. If I can maintain that record until I retire I will have accomplished my goal. The law can be enforced vigorously and without overstepping the authority granted. There are a lot more officers like me than there are like you read about in the news.

    ETA: Thanks for the rep Rambone

    You sound like a good officer.

    As I am sure you will agree some officers seem destined to over react.

    In the instant media work we live in an officer's over reaction 2000 miles away can effect us here.

    All too many times the public profiles us too, they assume we are like that.
     
    Last edited:

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,038
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Never mind. I already know what you think, or at least what you attempt to get others to think.

    Matters not what I think. Matters only what we see on the video.

    At deposition and trial we will hear that the officer was only doing as trained.

    The whole combative, "people are the enemy, I want to go home" attitude is hurting our society. This training needs to be corrected.
     

    phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    18,941
    113
    Arcadia
    Matters not what I think. Matters only what we see on the video.

    At deposition and trial we will hear that the officer was only doing as trained.

    The whole combative, "people are the enemy, I want to go home" attitude is hurting our society. This training needs to be corrected.

    A good attorney would pick his statement apart because he was not doing what he was trained to do.
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,437
    149
    Napganistan
    I'm a combatives instructor for our dept and I've never seen anything like that taught for a "take down". Cannot speak for his training but I doubt he was taught that.
     

    mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    Another question, who is paying for the hospital bill, how much is it costing per day, who is paying the family bills while the guy is in the coma? I tend to ask these questions from time to time.
    I would imagine his insurance is paying for it, if it's been kept up. Otherwise it's quite likely that the family is footing the bill. There's a chance that it could be a medicaid case by now. The only sure thing should be that the city will, in all likelihood will have to pick up the bill. Well, their insurance carriers and the taxpayers, anyway. I think we can be reasonably certain that the cop who did this and his department won't be paying anything towards this poor man's upkeep.
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,437
    149
    Napganistan
    The whole combative, "people are the enemy, I want to go home" attitude is hurting our society. This training needs to be corrected.
    Not sure who's training you are referring to. There is nothing wrong with the mantra "I'm going home every night." It is taught in 2 ways. First, "Be safe." Meaning, conduct yourself in a safe manner...watch the hands, read the body language, do a good search of the person when you arrest them, basic officer safety. Second, if they fight you...YOU WILL WIN! We will prevail within our legal bounds. Recruits are required to read "On Combat" which is part their training in forming the proper mindset. Nothing wrong with wanting to go home safely every night. Those who step over the line do so at their own will. Because they twist the training to fit their own ideals does not make the training evil. If I was actively fighting a BG and I had to shove him in a manner that inadvertently caused severe injury/death to him I would have A LOT of explaining to do but I COULD be ok...however, from what I saw (based solely on that snippet of video) it appears to be indefensible. Not saying that they could not put up a defense but rather I cannot see any defense convincing a jury.
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,038
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    he was not doing what he was trained to do

    We shall see. My guess is that we will hear all about how this was suggested and recommended during training just like Chief Wiggum referenced.

    Just following my training is becoming the new just following orders which was the new black.:D

    No matter how many times you say probable cause or just following my training does not make this right. Police training needs the warm, disinfecting impact of sunlight. This nonsense must stop.
     

    phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    18,941
    113
    Arcadia
    Police training needs the warm, disinfecting impact of sunlight.

    You mean the departments need to hire an attorney to tell them what, who, where, when and how to train, right? No thanks.

    This nonsense must stop.

    Sure it must. Just like murder, rape, robbery, assault, child molestation, incest, divorce, unreasonable taxes, speed limits, gasoline prices, bad weather, etc.. Just like I mentioned earlier, American law enforcement is not responsible for what that officer did on that day. That officer is responsible for what that officer did that day. His department will write a check for allowing it to happen, God help them if he had a history of excessive force complaints.
     

    machete

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 16, 2010
    715
    16
    Traplantis
    There is nothing wrong with the mantra "I'm going home every night."

    as long as they look at it like a hope or a slogan and dont really believe it and dont make it the most improtant thing...

    Second, if they fight you...YOU WILL WIN!

    what if the cop started something he shouldnt??? if thats the case,,,the cop should back down,,,not go deeper in...

    Recruits are required to read "On Combat" which is part their training in forming the proper mindset.

    OH NO!!! BIG PROBLEM THERE!!! that aint the proper mind to get in... public servants aint in combat... we aint the enemy,,, that book should not be taught,,,and any cop who relies on that book should immediately be found in the wrong...

    Not saying that they could not put up a defense but rather I cannot see any defense convincing a jury.

    dont see this making it to a jury,,,cops almost never serve time for their crimes of violence against THE PEOPLE!!!

    phylodog said:
    You mean the departments need to hire an attorney to tell them what, who, where, when and how to train, right? No thanks.

    sounds like a good idea... citizen oversight is a great idea,,,and citizen board approval for academy passage is also a good idea...
     

    mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    You mean the departments need to hire an attorney to tell them what, who, where, when and how to train, right? No thanks.
    Actually, phylo there is a well respected law firm that specialises in just that. Many departments around the country use them and their advice is indispensable for cops who'd like to stay on the right side of things. Legal and liability risk is something all cops should have an interest in, even though they don't have to pick up the tab for a lawsuit. Shoot, LLRMI offers some seriously good advice on numerous subjects of interest, from Tasering people to stopping them properly. Any cop with an interest in doing things right could benefit from folks like these. Perhaps there'd be fewer lawsuits for the taxpayers to pick up the tab for and fewer incidents to create those suits.

    Legal & Liability Risk Management Services & Training: Law Enforcement, Jails, Insurance Pools & Risk Managers
     

    phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    18,941
    113
    Arcadia
    Actually, phylo there is a well respected law firm that specialises in just that. Many departments around the country use them and their advice is indispensable for cops who'd like to stay on the right side of things. Legal and liability risk is something all cops should have an interest in, even though they don't have to pick up the tab for a lawsuit. Shoot, LLRMI offers some seriously good advice on numerous subjects of interest, from Tasering people to stopping them properly. Any cop with an interest in doing things right could benefit from folks like these. Perhaps there'd be fewer lawsuits for the taxpayers to pick up the tab for and fewer incidents to create those suits.

    Legal & Liability Risk Management Services & Training: Law Enforcement, Jails, Insurance Pools & Risk Managers

    I went to the link and it appears that more than half of their staff at least has some experience in law enforcement and several have both prior LE experience and are now attorneys. An organization like that would make sense. Remove the LE experience on staff and forget about it.
     

    machete

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 16, 2010
    715
    16
    Traplantis
    I went to the link and it appears that more than half of their staff at least has some experience in law enforcement and several have both prior LE experience and are now attorneys. An organization like that would make sense. Remove the LE experience on staff and forget about it.

    as a service customer,,,im good with le overseers having no le experience,,,actually,,,i think i want it that way...

    i dont have any experience running a restaurant,,,but i sure know what i want when i go to one...

    we have to break the cycle of le getting advice from le...it aint working...
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,038
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Just like I mentioned earlier, American law enforcement is not responsible for what that officer did on that day.

    That remains to be seen. We shall see.

    However, it remains a valid topic of political discussion and something all voters should keep in mind and hold their employees into account.

    You mean the departments need to hire an attorney to tell them what, who, where, when and how to train, right? No thanks.

    Not in particular, but police departments should tell us what they are doing.

    The more sunlight injected into a police department the less corruption, brutality and Bisardesque hide the football tactics will transpire.

    That officer is responsible for what that officer did that day.

    Yes, without question, but others could be responsible as co-conspirators. E.g. his department which taught him to do that, Chief Wiggum who is obviously covering for him (did you know if you repeat "probable cause" it makes excessive force just ducky?), his fellow officers who will tell us how he was just following his training.
     

    serpicostraight

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 14, 2009
    1,951
    36
    Yes, with question, but others could be responsible as co-conspirators. E.g. his department which taught him to do that, Chief Wiggum who is obviously covering for him, his fellow officers who will tell us how he was just following his training.snip. this does make me wonder why when someone is accused of a crime the cops are always complaining about the family coming along and saying what a good guy he was. but it seems like the cops do the same thing. everytime a cop does something like this they circle the wagons and start saying what a great officer he was and all the awards he has won. but in all fairness i have seen some here and some others who have stood thier ground and called it for what it was. i just wish they was all like that.
     

    phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    18,941
    113
    Arcadia
    That remains to be seen. We shall see.

    However, it remains a valid topic of political discussion and something all voters should keep in mind and hold their employees into account.



    Not in particular, but police departments should tell us what they are doing.

    The more sunlight injected into a police department the less corruption, brutality and Bisardesque hide the football tactics will transpire.



    Yes, without question, but others could be responsible as co-conspirators. E.g. his department which taught him to do that, Chief Wiggum who is obviously covering for him (did you know if you repeat "probable cause" it makes excessive force just ducky?), his fellow officers who will tell us how he was just following his training.

    I gotta tell you Kirk. I have met some people in my life that I didn't enjoy talking to. I have met some that I wanted to strangle. You are the first person I have ever had discussions with who, at times, makes me want to pound my face against a brick wall, must be the attorney in you. :D
     
    Top Bottom