...but I gotta ask...
Shouldn't that just be "history" too?
Yep, but marketing. We tell the same history no matter where you were born.
...but I gotta ask...
Shouldn't that just be "history" too?
So, uh, how would a presumably private conversation between two heads of state be so accurately described? Sorry, the press has lost any chance at the benefit of the doubt from me. I call BS.
You are correct. Never give the media the benefit of the doubt. They have an agenda.
You are correct. Never give the media the benefit of the doubt. They have an agenda.
Also it looks like Sen. John McStupid ran off half cocked and stepped on his dink again.
If it weren't for quibbling, there would be just 5 posts in this thread! Lol!
So, I beg to differ. His sanctions are roughly equal, perhaps exceeding (devil in the details), Pres Obama's sanctions on Russia for allegedly attempting to destabilize our elections. "Our elections! The life blood of our nation!" to pseudo quote the media.
If they test another missile, look for UN Ambassador Halley to start beating the drums for global sanctions... sidesteps even having to re-look at the nuke deal (which is empty anyhow, Iran got the money). Smart move and just a first step.
On a different front, if he doesn't address Ukraine within the next week, as in halt and withdraw otherwise anti-tank missiles will be on the ground in Ukrainian hands within 24 hours, then that'll be at least a -2, perhaps a -5 if Putin is emboldened and doubles down.
Both bad actors are testing Pres Trump and should be addressed with appropriate and escalating responses.
You are correct. Never give the media the benefit of the doubt. They have an agenda.
Nobody is
Huh? The grey god-king is. Don't be blaspheming Ron Paul.
That's why I said to give them 6 to begin with... which should be enough burned out hulks to let Putin know we mean business. IF not, then it's like the heroin needle program, bring us a used one and get a new one.Yeah, because sophisticated weapons that could endanger US forces never fall into the wrong hands after the crisis is over
Also it looks like Sen. John McStupid ran off half cocked and stepped on his dink again.
Not to worry, it wasn't teal.
Purple heresy may be pardonable.
Yep, sarcasm. Referencing the fact the Libertarians and their eponymous party eat their own young first
That's why I said to give them 6 to begin with... which should be enough burned out hulks to let Putin know we mean business. IF not, then it's like the heroin needle program, bring us a used one and get a new one.
SD4L, nothing about this has a whiff of Viet Nam for you? Attempting to prop up a government in a country with a significant internal insurgency against an adversary with much shorter supply lines by supplying them (first) with relatively sophisticated
weaponry. And in this case the adversary is more than ideologically motivated, he is motivated by a threat to access to one of only a few warm water ports available to him. Perhaps Ukraine and Georgia should not have taken the US having their back as carte blanche to conduct their relations with Russia in any manner they wished, no matter how provocative
I'm not sure if that got funnier or less funny, but whatever ...high five!
...You two would be fun to drink with...
Yeah. I guess I'm torn because I suspect Ukraine's position is untenable. I don't want to abandon them before we even try to help, but I think they need to see their position in the great game as something like Norway's. If they cannot grasp realpolitik, then we may need to cut our losses sooner rather than later. This in turn chafes because I support any peoples' yearning to be truly free, but I don't want to encourage them to set themselves up to be crushed - a circumstance wherein if the Russians decide to accomplish it at all costs; the only thing we'll be able to do is raise the cost, not affect the outcome