YOU sound confused. Maybe I should have juxtoposed Irish and English nationalism. "white" is irrelevant to "nationalism" outside of the context of white supremacism.
As for Jewish nationalism (zionism), Jewish identity has both a religious and national component. The notion that "chosen people" indicates inherent superiority is just a reflection of your world view. You might ask "chosen for what"--like living in a covenant with God and thereby being a "light unto the nations". That's a mission statement that's about duty and obligation. The Torah says: "It is not because of your virtues that you will b able to occupy their country, but because of the wickedness of those nations the Lord your God is dispossessing them before you, and in order to fulfill the oath that the Lord mad to Your fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob." Devarim/Deuteronomy 9.5. There is a Talmudic legend that before God gave the Torah to the people of Israel at Sinai, he offered it to the Canaanites and Moabites who asked "what's in the deal? Oh, no adultery, robbery, and murder? No thanks." The people of Israel said at Sinai, "We will do it and we will listen". Unconditional acceptance. Therefore the concept is one of being the CHOOSING people.
btw, why would anyone in their right think that Lincoln was worse than hitler? Lincoln was an abolitionist, and hitler was a genocidal maniac that tried to enslave the world.
As for Jewish nationalism (zionism), Jewish identity has both a religious and national component. The notion that "chosen people" indicates inherent superiority is just a reflection of your world view. You might ask "chosen for what"--like living in a covenant with God and thereby being a "light unto the nations". That's a mission statement that's about duty and obligation. The Torah says: "It is not because of your virtues that you will b able to occupy their country, but because of the wickedness of those nations the Lord your God is dispossessing them before you, and in order to fulfill the oath that the Lord mad to Your fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob." Devarim/Deuteronomy 9.5. There is a Talmudic legend that before God gave the Torah to the people of Israel at Sinai, he offered it to the Canaanites and Moabites who asked "what's in the deal? Oh, no adultery, robbery, and murder? No thanks." The people of Israel said at Sinai, "We will do it and we will listen". Unconditional acceptance. Therefore the concept is one of being the CHOOSING people.
btw, why would anyone in their right think that Lincoln was worse than hitler? Lincoln was an abolitionist, and hitler was a genocidal maniac that tried to enslave the world.
You sound confused? Nazism was for Germans, KKK were for traditionally Anglo-Saxon Christian Americans.
I figured you'd know this; after all, the KKK was created to halt yankee carpetbaggers who were coming to the South and exploiting the problems of the war torn South.
Um, "White" emcompasses all ethnic White people, Swede, American, French, and yes Ukranian, Greeks, Spaniards, non-Arabic Iranians, Middle Eastern folks such as the Kalash etc.
It's a very broad term, in my opinion.
That is properganda. If we apply that same basis, then Israels conception, not to mention the Jewish people's agenda is based on nothing more than Supremacism, not to mention Israel is a prime example of JEWISH Nationalism - "A Nation for those of jewish descent."
I think it's a great idea
I dont believe it's correct to apply the 'supremacist' to only one group of people. I used the jewish example, because I know you could relate, outside of that, I could've thrown up other numerous examples, all of which are socially acceptable, even though they're members spew more hatred in speech and Action than any American White group ever could.
I think it's fair to say that Latinos will seek/create organizations which will push they're agenda, just like black people, jews.
Can you explain why it's so taboo for Whites to have such an organization or screw it, just the mere idea of having that agenda without being labeled, unfairly.
And I say unfairly, because I never hear anyone call NAACP, ADL, La raza out for they're racism. Infact, they trump themselves up as heroes, liberators, freedom fighters against oppressors.
Hmmm, You do realize this country was founded upon WN? Even Abe Lincoln would have been considered evil, far worse than Hitler etc.
Just goes to show the ignorance and properganda, correct?
When Saying the Pledge of Alliegence, being a Christian and simply being patriotic are considered evil, backwashed, ignorant "redneck".
I'd say there is a desire to destroy the Nations founding, and screw over the Founders prosperity.