HARVEYtheDAMNED
Marksman
- Dec 8, 2011
- 197
- 18
It isn't proactive, it's more of the same.I'm not trying to debate the past. I was simply answering a question. Drunk or not, LaPierre's proposition is far more proactive than the left's plan of banning everything but muzzle-loaders!
As far as Waynes view on violent video games and movies, thee way i heard it is the parents of children need to take more responsabilties to what their kids watch and play.
I didn't say it is the MOST proactive solution! I said it was a better option than banning everything! I agree 100% that if every teacher were carrying, the odds would improve greatly over having an armed guard or two, but I'm sorry to say, that a good portion of teachers these days, are just as lib-tarded as our lawmakers and media!It isn't proactive, it's more of the same.
Restore the teachers RIGHT to self defense.
While not as bad as it could have been, it shows the nra is out of touch and focusing on a federal solution, solutions that haven't, and won't, work.
Time will tell if the nra caves on hicaps and "assault weapons".
It isn't proactive, it's more of the same.
Restore the teachers RIGHT to self defense.
While not as bad as it could have been, it shows the nra is out of touch and focusing on a federal solution, solutions that haven't, and won't, work.
Time will tell if the nra caves on hicaps and "assault weapons".
The NRA has never been against the police state. They've supported it for years. Just look at their support for Project Exile and the expansion of police powers. Maybe the NRA can fund the armed guards, they're making enough money. Seriously, if that's the best the "premiere gun rights group" can come up with then we are ****ed.What a moron. Blame video games and movies? Pretty hypocritical.
A police officer in every school? Who is going to pay for it?
What a way to continue to create a police state.
. I noticed one comment one worthless sheeple stated that she said "I don't think people need guns in their houses!"