Protest Groups Plan to Shut Down Inauguration, Paralyze DC

[actaeon277]

Sounds like terrorism to me.


Ironically, they plot, not realizing if they bring things down, they are the most likely to not survive if society breaks down.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Kut, you got those links I asked for?

https://www.google.com/amp/www.inqu...ng-to-pay-liberals-to-riot/amp/?client=safari

Would you call anything they put out reliable after this?

 

[bwframe]

The libs would like us to believe that Project Veritas makes a lot of stuff up, out of thin air. Acorn, Planned Parenthood, sure.


I'm thinking Trump should put Project Veritas on the gov't payroll looking into our own "intelligence" agencies?

 

[Kutnupe14]

The libs would like us to believe that Project Veritas makes a lot of stuff up, out of thin air. Acorn, Planned Parenthood, sure.


I'm thinking Trump should put Project Veritas on the gov't payroll looking into our own "intelligence" agencies?

A lot? I'm not saying that, and your statement is very telling...."a lot?" Even if it's "a little," which seems to be what you are implying, then their future credibility in similar matters is suspect. I think most would understand this.

 

[jamil]

https://www.google.com/amp/www.inqu...ng-to-pay-liberals-to-riot/amp/?client=safari

Would you call anything they put out reliable after this?

Oh. Okay. So are sting operations where cops offer people money to do illegal ****...so they can catch people doing illegal ****...are those cops reliable? C'mon Kut. You're better than that.

Basically it was sting/counter-sting. All Veritas got caught doing was trying to infiltrate a group to see if they could get them to admit they're willing to break the law. Hookers and druggies get busted the same way all the time. Now, in the Young Turks video, he said the "undercover" reporter was made because she'd already been identified as participating in one of the sting operations against Hillary's thugs. But in the article, she was "made" because she drove a white pickup truck...idunno, because blondes never drive white pickup trucks. So who knows?

So, are they reliable? The only rebuttal in this case is audio of this "undercover" reporter trying to get a liberal group to take the bait. Doesn't suggest anything more than that fact. If I'm biased to the left I might be inclined to believe the headlines more than just the knowable facts.

So, my opinion of reliable/unreliable is unchanged. I neither believe nor disbelieve. All parties have a reason to lie, and they all have more facts about the actual details than I do. Unless I can know those same facts, I tuck it away in the "plausible but unconfirmed" column. But I can have fun with it.

 

[jamil]

A lot? I'm not saying that, and your statement is very telling...."a lot?" Even if it's "a little," which seems to be what you are implying, then their future credibility in similar matters is suspect. I think most would understand this.

No. I took it that he's referring to the volume of supposed shenanigans exposed by Veritas. It's a lot of stuff. And I do think that it's enough stuff that liberals would want to believe it is made up. But this video doesn't prove that the wrong doing exposed thus far is any more made up than when cops try to pay hookers for sex to bust them for breaking the law.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Oh. Okay. So are sting operations where cops offer people money to do illegal ****...so they can catch people doing illegal ****...are those cops reliable? C'mon Kut. You're better than that.

Basically it was sting/counter-sting. All Veritas got caught doing was trying to infiltrate a group to see if they could get them to admit they're willing to break the law. Hookers and druggies get busted the same way all the time. Now, in the Young Turks video, he said the "undercover" reporter was made because she'd already been identified as participating in one of the sting operations against Hillary's thugs. But in the article, she was "made" because she drove a white pickup truck...idunno, because blondes never drive white pickup trucks. So who knows?

So, are they reliable? The only rebuttal in this case is audio of this "undercover" reporter trying to get a liberal group to take the bait. Doesn't suggest anything more than that fact. If I'm biased to the left I might be inclined to believe the headlines more than just the knowable facts.

So, my opinion of reliable/unreliable is unchanged. I neither believe nor disbelieve. All parties have a reason to lie, and they all have more facts about the actual details than I do. Unless I can know those same facts, I tuck it away in the "plausible but unconfirmed" column. But I can have fun with it.

If you say so, but a "sting" typically involves exposing something that someone was already planning or inclined to do. Offering money to have someone commit a crime, is a crime in itself.

 

[jamil]

If you say so, but a "sting" typically involves exposing something that someone was already planning or inclined to do. Offering money to have someone commit a crime, is a crime in itself.

Journalists tend to be immune to such things, but admittedly this is pushing it. I don't have the facts though. I don't know if they just decided to start throwing out **** to see which walls it stuck to, or if they had obtained information that lead them to believe that this group was planing something anyway. Both scenarios are plausible. And, like I said, both sides have really good reasons to lie. And I don't have all the facts. I'll just tuck it away as a datapoint and leave my opinion unchanged.

 

[churchmouse]

Nothing wrong. Just breaking out the hot and buttered.

 

[jamil]

Nothing wrong. Just breaking out the hot and buttered.

If it's lightly buttered, mind sharing? Trying to watch my intake these days.

 

[churchmouse]

If it's lightly buttered, mind sharing? Trying to watch my intake these days.

You can salt your own.....

 

[jamil]

You know, I've never really liked a lot of salt on my popcorn. Just slather it in real butter and the butter has enough salt for me. Now that I've cut down on butter, it's still salty enough. But people do complain about blandness when I share.

 

[churchmouse]

You know, I've never really liked a lot of salt on my popcorn. Just slather it in real butter and the butter has enough salt for me. Now that I've cut down on butter, it's still salty enough. But people do complain about blandness when I share.

Gots to have the butter and salt. Not often but when I do it is a treat.

 

[churchmouse]

Carry on fellas. I was enjoying the read.

 

[jamil]

Since project Veritas came out with the "sting" video allegedly exposing some group of planning to stink bomb one of the deploraballs (really? "deploraballs?") I wonder, if any groups were really planning shenanigans, if they'll go through with it now.

 

[bwframe]

[video=youtube;xIjbkYLI1nY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIjbkYLI1nY[/video]

[video=youtube;I059AF23JQw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I059AF23JQw[/video]

 

[jamil]

Well, Kut. We'll know which side is lying if they get arrested. Paying someone to do something illegal is illegal. Conspiring to do something illegal is illegal. So, let's see who gets arrested, if any of them?

 

[Bsj425]

Reading this and the project veritas video is seriously eye opening. The left has come completely unhinged and the man hasn't even taken office yet. This big difference is Obama, Holder and the DOJ let this crap go on and borderline encouraged it. Trump is extremely pro law enforcement and believes in the rule of law. Hopefully they crack down on this from day 1 and set an example that this crap will not be tolerated, otherwise its going to be a very interesting 4 years. Yes people are within their right to assemble and protest. But what they describe is domestic terrorism there is a big difference between an actual peaceful protest and doing things that will physically harm people and deny them freedom of movement and cause panics. This is absolutely nuts, speaking of nuts we will see who actually has them and will follow through in a couple days.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Reading this and the project veritas video is seriously eye opening. The left has come completely unhinged and the man hasn't even taken office yet. This big difference is Obama, Holder and the DOJ let this crap go on and borderline encouraged it. Trump is extremely pro law enforcement and believes in the rule of law. Hopefully they crack down on this from day 1 and set an example that this crap will not be tolerated, otherwise its going to be a very interesting 4 years. Yes people are within their right to assemble and protest. But what they describe is domestic terrorism there is a big difference between an actual peaceful protest and doing things that will physically harm people and deny them freedom of movement and cause panics. This is absolutely nuts, speaking of nuts we will see who actually has them and will follow through in a couple days.

I got a chuckle out of that one.

 

[jamil]

I got a chuckle out of that one.

Oh. I believe Trump has given us penty from which to extrapolate that. But I suspect he'll also be more law, less liberty.