LE sting operations do this all the time.
Yep, and I think it's entrapment, and should be illegal.
LE sting operations do this all the time.
Nah, I'm good. Anything that comes from people that purposely try to get people to do illegal acts doesn't have any credibility to me.
like undercover police and federal agents? So are you jobsearching?
Then obama's importing of hundreds of thousands of illegal minors must drive you crazy
Can't say I'm familiar with that policy.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/DREAM_Act
https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxn...ing-southern-us-border.amp.html?client=safari
step 1: bring the kids
step 2: "how can you separate these poor families?! Waaaah. You HaVE to bring their parents over! Waaaah"
Nah, I'm good. Anything that comes from people that purposely try to get people to do illegal acts doesn't have any credibility to me.
Yep, and I think it's entrapment, and should be illegal.
Nice job Tucker. Exposing groups that concerning paid protesters.
How a hoax website about paid protesters came crumbling down live on TV
Good because you're right it should be illegal.Yep, and I think it's entrapment, and should be illegal.
Just found out my Brother-in-law is heading to DC from Portland to protest. He texted his mom to let her know he was going and that he loved her. She reminded him that his nieces (my daughter) birthday was on that day and to not do something stupid that ruins that day for her. My wife and I decided that if something happens that we just won't tell the kids and we'll just let him fade into history.
I'll have to take some time to digest this. If it's anything like your link supposedly proving project Veritas paid people to commit acts of terrorism, I'm going to start wondering about your objectivity.
That's not quite the same thing as importing, at least as fair as the definition of "importing," is concerned.
I'll have to take some time to digest this. If it's anything like your link supposedly proving project Veritas paid people to commit acts of terrorism, I'm going to start wondering about your objectivity.
I didn't provide a link concerning terrorism. I don't even think there's a question concerning objectivity. I presented information that runs contrary to what a good number of people on INGO believe; one from a conservative source, one from a liberal source. If you can find anything false concerning either from a reputable source, present it.
I did. You said you didn't want to hear it.
...I'm going to start wondering about your objectivity.
Lulz
Key words "reputable source."
So the guy who broke the story that you think says what you say it says, that he later said it says what I said it said is not a reputable source?